Theorem prv 35493

Description: The "proves" relation on a set. A wff encoded as 𝑈 is true in a model 𝑀 iff for every valuation 𝑠 ∈ (𝑀 ↑_m ω), the interpretation of the wff using the membership relation on 𝑀 is true. (Contributed by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
prv	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀⊧𝑈 ↔ (𝑀 Sat∈ 𝑈) = (𝑀 ↑m ω)))

Proof of Theorem prv

Dummy variables 𝑚 𝑢 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		oveq12 7361	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑚 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑈) → (𝑚 Sat∈ 𝑢) = (𝑀 Sat∈ 𝑈))
2		simpl 482	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑚 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑈) → 𝑚 = 𝑀)
3	2	oveq1d 7367	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑚 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑈) → (𝑚 ↑m ω) = (𝑀 ↑m ω))
4	1, 3	eqeq12d 2749	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑚 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑈) → ((𝑚 Sat∈ 𝑢) = (𝑚 ↑m ω) ↔ (𝑀 Sat∈ 𝑈) = (𝑀 ↑m ω)))
5		df-prv 35411	. 2 ⊢ ⊧ = {⟨𝑚, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑚 Sat∈ 𝑢) = (𝑚 ↑m ω)}
6	4, 5	brabga 5477	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀⊧𝑈 ↔ (𝑀 Sat∈ 𝑈) = (𝑀 ↑m ω)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113   class class class wbr 5093  (class class class)co 7352  ωcom 7802   ↑_m cmap 8756   Sat_∈ csate 35403  ⊧cprv 35404

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-ext 2705  ax-sep 5236  ax-nul 5246  ax-pr 5372

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2712  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2808  df-rab 3397  df-v 3439  df-dif 3901  df-un 3903  df-ss 3915  df-nul 4283  df-if 4475  df-sn 4576  df-pr 4578  df-op 4582  df-uni 4859  df-br 5094  df-opab 5156  df-iota 6442  df-fv 6494  df-ov 7355  df-prv 35411

This theorem is referenced by:  elnanelprv  35494  prv0  35495  prv1n  35496