Theorem prv0 35793

Description: Every wff encoded as 𝑈 is true in an "empty model" (𝑀 = ∅). Since ⊧ is defined in terms of the interpretations making the given formula true, it is not defined on the "empty model", since there are no interpretations. In particular, the empty set on the LHS of ⊧ should not be interpreted as the empty model, because ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑥 is not satisfied on the empty model. (Contributed by AV, 19-Nov-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
prv0	⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ∅⊧𝑈)

Proof of Theorem prv0

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sate0 35778	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
2		peano1 7873	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ∅ ∈ ω
3	2	n0ii 4298	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ¬ ω = ∅
4	3	intnan 491	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∧ ω = ∅)
5	4	a1i 11	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∧ ω = ∅))
6		f00 6750	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥:ω⟶∅ ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∧ ω = ∅))
7	5, 6	sylnibr 332	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ¬ 𝑥:ω⟶∅)
8		0ex 5262	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
9	8, 8	pm3.2i 475	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)
10		satfvel 35775	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈)) → 𝑥:ω⟶∅)
11	9, 10	mp3an1 1472	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈)) → 𝑥:ω⟶∅)
12	7, 11	mtand 827	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
13	12	alrimiv 1950	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
14		eq0 4305	. . . 4 ⊢ ((((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
15	13, 14	sylibr 237	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈) = ∅)
16	1, 15	eqtrd 2800	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = ∅)
17		prv 35791	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ V ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω)) → (∅⊧𝑈 ↔ (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (∅ ↑m ω)))
18	8, 17	mpan 702	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅⊧𝑈 ↔ (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (∅ ↑m ω)))
19	2	ne0ii 4299	. . . . 5 ⊢ ω ≠ ∅
20		map0b 8869	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ω ≠ ∅ → (∅ ↑m ω) = ∅)
21	19, 20	mp1i 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅ ↑m ω) = ∅)
22	21	eqeq2d 2776	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ((∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (∅ ↑m ω) ↔ (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = ∅))
23	18, 22	bitrd 282	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅⊧𝑈 ↔ (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = ∅))
24	16, 23	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ∅⊧𝑈)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400  ∀wal 1561   = wceq 1563   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2960  Vcvv 3457  ∅c0 4288   class class class wbr 5105  ⟶wf 6521  ‘cfv 6525  (class class class)co 7400  ωcom 7850   ↑_m cmap 8812   Sat csat 35699  Fmlacfmla 35700   Sat_∈ csate 35701  ⊧cprv 35702

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1818  ax-4 1832  ax-5 1933  ax-6 1990  ax-7 2031  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2737  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7722  ax-inf2 9598  ax-ac2 10435

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1102  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1566  df-fal 1576  df-ex 1803  df-nf 1807  df-sb 2094  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-nel 3065  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rmo 3370  df-reu 3371  df-rab 3418  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3748  df-csb 3856  df-dif 3910  df-un 3912  df-in 3914  df-ss 3924  df-pss 3927  df-nul 4289  df-if 4484  df-pw 4560  df-sn 4586  df-pr 4588  df-op 4592  df-uni 4869  df-int 4909  df-iun 4954  df-br 5106  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-tr 5213  df-id 5547  df-eprel 5552  df-po 5560  df-so 5561  df-fr 5605  df-se 5606  df-we 5607  df-xp 5658  df-rel 5659  df-cnv 5660  df-co 5661  df-dm 5662  df-rn 5663  df-res 5664  df-ima 5665  df-pred 6292  df-ord 6353  df-on 6354  df-lim 6355  df-suc 6356  df-iota 6481  df-fun 6527  df-fn 6528  df-f 6529  df-f1 6530  df-fo 6531  df-f1o 6532  df-fv 6533  df-isom 6534  df-riota 7357  df-ov 7403  df-oprab 7404  df-mpo 7405  df-om 7851  df-1st 7974  df-2nd 7975  df-frecs 8266  df-wrecs 8297  df-recs 8346  df-rdg 8385  df-1o 8441  df-2o 8442  df-er 8682  df-map 8814  df-en 8932  df-dom 8933  df-sdom 8934  df-fin 8935  df-card 9913  df-ac 10088  df-goel 35703  df-gona 35704  df-goal 35705  df-sat 35706  df-sate 35707  df-fmla 35708  df-prv 35709

This theorem is referenced by: (None)