Theorem prv0 35417

Description: Every wff encoded as 𝑈 is true in an "empty model" (𝑀 = ∅). Since ⊧ is defined in terms of the interpretations making the given formula true, it is not defined on the "empty model", since there are no interpretations. In particular, the empty set on the LHS of ⊧ should not be interpreted as the empty model, because ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑥 is not satisfied on the empty model. (Contributed by AV, 19-Nov-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
prv0	⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ∅⊧𝑈)

Proof of Theorem prv0

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sate0 35402	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
2		peano1 7867	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ∅ ∈ ω
3	2	n0ii 4308	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ¬ ω = ∅
4	3	intnan 486	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∧ ω = ∅)
5	4	a1i 11	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∧ ω = ∅))
6		f00 6744	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥:ω⟶∅ ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∧ ω = ∅))
7	5, 6	sylnibr 329	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ¬ 𝑥:ω⟶∅)
8		0ex 5264	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
9	8, 8	pm3.2i 470	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)
10		satfvel 35399	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈)) → 𝑥:ω⟶∅)
11	9, 10	mp3an1 1450	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈)) → 𝑥:ω⟶∅)
12	7, 11	mtand 815	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
13	12	alrimiv 1927	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
14		eq0 4315	. . . 4 ⊢ ((((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
15	13, 14	sylibr 234	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈) = ∅)
16	1, 15	eqtrd 2765	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = ∅)
17		prv 35415	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ V ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω)) → (∅⊧𝑈 ↔ (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (∅ ↑m ω)))
18	8, 17	mpan 690	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅⊧𝑈 ↔ (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (∅ ↑m ω)))
19	2	ne0ii 4309	. . . . 5 ⊢ ω ≠ ∅
20		map0b 8858	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ω ≠ ∅ → (∅ ↑m ω) = ∅)
21	19, 20	mp1i 13	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅ ↑m ω) = ∅)
22	21	eqeq2d 2741	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ((∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (∅ ↑m ω) ↔ (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = ∅))
23	18, 22	bitrd 279	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅⊧𝑈 ↔ (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = ∅))
24	16, 23	mpbird 257	1 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ∅⊧𝑈)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1538   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109   ≠ wne 2926  Vcvv 3450  ∅c0 4298   class class class wbr 5109  ⟶wf 6509  ‘cfv 6513  (class class class)co 7389  ωcom 7844   ↑_m cmap 8801   Sat csat 35323  Fmlacfmla 35324   Sat_∈ csate 35325  ⊧cprv 35326

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2702  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5253  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5322  ax-pr 5389  ax-un 7713  ax-inf2 9600  ax-ac2 10422

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2927  df-nel 3031  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-rmo 3356  df-reu 3357  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3756  df-csb 3865  df-dif 3919  df-un 3921  df-in 3923  df-ss 3933  df-pss 3936  df-nul 4299  df-if 4491  df-pw 4567  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4874  df-int 4913  df-iun 4959  df-br 5110  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-tr 5217  df-id 5535  df-eprel 5540  df-po 5548  df-so 5549  df-fr 5593  df-se 5594  df-we 5595  df-xp 5646  df-rel 5647  df-cnv 5648  df-co 5649  df-dm 5650  df-rn 5651  df-res 5652  df-ima 5653  df-pred 6276  df-ord 6337  df-on 6338  df-lim 6339  df-suc 6340  df-iota 6466  df-fun 6515  df-fn 6516  df-f 6517  df-f1 6518  df-fo 6519  df-f1o 6520  df-fv 6521  df-isom 6522  df-riota 7346  df-ov 7392  df-oprab 7393  df-mpo 7394  df-om 7845  df-1st 7970  df-2nd 7971  df-frecs 8262  df-wrecs 8293  df-recs 8342  df-rdg 8380  df-1o 8436  df-2o 8437  df-er 8673  df-map 8803  df-en 8921  df-dom 8922  df-sdom 8923  df-fin 8924  df-card 9898  df-ac 10075  df-goel 35327  df-gona 35328  df-goal 35329  df-sat 35330  df-sate 35331  df-fmla 35332  df-prv 35333

This theorem is referenced by: (None)