Theorem prv0 35900

Description: Every wff encoded as 𝑈 is true in an "empty model" (𝑀 = ∅). Since ⊧ is defined in terms of the interpretations making the given formula true, it is not defined on the "empty model", since there are no interpretations. In particular, the empty set on the LHS of ⊧ should not be interpreted as the empty model, because ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑥 is not satisfied on the empty model. (Contributed by AV, 19-Nov-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
prv0	⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ∅⊧𝑈)

Proof of Theorem prv0

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sate0 35885	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
2		peano1 7886	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ∅ ∈ ω
3	2	n0ii 4297	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ¬ ω = ∅
4	3	intnan 491	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∧ ω = ∅)
5	4	a1i 11	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∧ ω = ∅))
6		f00 6762	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥:ω⟶∅ ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∧ ω = ∅))
7	5, 6	sylnibr 332	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ¬ 𝑥:ω⟶∅)
8		0ex 5271	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
9	8, 8	pm3.2i 475	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)
10		satfvel 35882	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈)) → 𝑥:ω⟶∅)
11	9, 10	mp3an1 1477	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈)) → 𝑥:ω⟶∅)
12	7, 11	mtand 827	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
13	12	alrimiv 1957	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
14		eq0 4305	. . . 4 ⊢ ((((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
15	13, 14	sylibr 237	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈) = ∅)
16	1, 15	eqtrd 2798	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = ∅)
17		prv 35898	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ V ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω)) → (∅⊧𝑈 ↔ (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (∅ ↑m ω)))
18	8, 17	mpan 702	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅⊧𝑈 ↔ (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (∅ ↑m ω)))
19	2	ne0ii 4298	. . . . 5 ⊢ ω ≠ ∅
20		map0b 8882	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ω ≠ ∅ → (∅ ↑m ω) = ∅)
21	19, 20	mp1i 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅ ↑m ω) = ∅)
22	21	eqeq2d 2774	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ((∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (∅ ↑m ω) ↔ (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = ∅))
23	18, 22	bitrd 282	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅⊧𝑈 ↔ (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = ∅))
24	16, 23	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ∅⊧𝑈)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143   ≠ wne 2958  Vcvv 3455  ∅c0 4287   class class class wbr 5110  ⟶wf 6534  ‘cfv 6538  (class class class)co 7412  ωcom 7863   ↑_m cmap 8825   Sat csat 35806  Fmlacfmla 35807   Sat_∈ csate 35808  ⊧cprv 35809

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5239  ax-sep 5258  ax-nul 5270  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7734  ax-inf2 9611  ax-ac2 10448

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-nel 3065  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3746  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-pss 3926  df-nul 4288  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4591  df-pr 4593  df-op 4597  df-uni 4874  df-int 4914  df-iun 4959  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-mpt 5194  df-tr 5220  df-id 5558  df-eprel 5563  df-po 5571  df-so 5572  df-fr 5616  df-se 5617  df-we 5618  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-pred 6304  df-ord 6365  df-on 6366  df-lim 6367  df-suc 6368  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-f 6542  df-f1 6543  df-fo 6544  df-f1o 6545  df-fv 6546  df-isom 6547  df-riota 7369  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-om 7864  df-1st 7987  df-2nd 7988  df-frecs 8279  df-wrecs 8310  df-recs 8359  df-rdg 8398  df-1o 8454  df-2o 8455  df-er 8695  df-map 8827  df-en 8945  df-dom 8946  df-sdom 8947  df-fin 8948  df-card 9926  df-ac 10101  df-goel 35810  df-gona 35811  df-goal 35812  df-sat 35813  df-sate 35814  df-fmla 35815  df-prv 35816

This theorem is referenced by: (None)