lindfpropd - Mathbox for Thierry Arnoux

	Mathbox for Thierry Arnoux		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > lindfpropd		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem lindfpropd 32773

Description: Property deduction for linearly independent families. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jul-2023.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
lindfpropd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐿))
lindfpropd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)))
lindfpropd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) = (0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐿)))
lindfpropd.4	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥(+_g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+_g‘𝐿)𝑦))
lindfpropd.5	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
lindfpropd.6	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐿)𝑦))
lindfpropd.k	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
lindfpropd.l	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑊)
lindfpropd.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
lindfpropd	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 LIndF 𝐾 ↔ 𝑋 LIndF 𝐿))

Distinct variable groups: 𝑥,𝐾,𝑦 𝑥,𝐿,𝑦 𝑥,𝑋,𝑦 𝜑,𝑥,𝑦 Allowed substitution hints: 𝐴(𝑥,𝑦) 𝑉(𝑥,𝑦) 𝑊(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem lindfpropd Dummy variables 𝑖 𝑘 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		lindfpropd.2	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)))
2		lindfpropd.3	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → (0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) = (0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐿)))
3	2	sneqd 4640	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))} = {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐿))})
4	1, 3	difeq12d 4123	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))}) = ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐿))}))
5	4	ad2antrr 723	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋) → ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))}) = ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐿))}))
6		simplll 772	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))})) → 𝜑)
7		simpr 484	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))})) → 𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))}))
8	7	eldifad 3960	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))})) → 𝑘 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)))
9		simpr 484	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾)) → 𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾))
10	9	ffvelcdmda 7086	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋) → (𝑋‘𝑖) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
11	10	adantr 480	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))})) → (𝑋‘𝑖) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
12		lindfpropd.6	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐿)𝑦))
13	12	oveqrspc2v 7439	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑘 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑋‘𝑖) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐾)(𝑋‘𝑖)) = (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐿)(𝑋‘𝑖)))
14	6, 8, 11, 13	syl12anc 834	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))})) → (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐾)(𝑋‘𝑖)) = (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐿)(𝑋‘𝑖)))
15		eqidd 2732	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐾))
16		lindfpropd.1	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐿))
17		ssidd 4005	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐾) ⊆ (Base‘𝐾))
18		lindfpropd.4	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥(+_g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+_g‘𝐿)𝑦))
19		lindfpropd.5	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
20		eqidd 2732	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)))
21		lindfpropd.k	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
22		lindfpropd.l	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑊)
23	15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 12, 20, 1, 21, 22	lsppropd 20774	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝜑 → (LSpan‘𝐾) = (LSpan‘𝐿))
24	23	fveq1d 6893	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((LSpan‘𝐾)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖}))) = ((LSpan‘𝐿)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖}))))
25	24	ad3antrrr 727	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))})) → ((LSpan‘𝐾)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖}))) = ((LSpan‘𝐿)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖}))))
26	14, 25	eleq12d 2826	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))})) → ((𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐾)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐾)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖}))) ↔ (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐿)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐿)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖})))))
27	26	notbid 318	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))})) → (¬ (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐾)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐾)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖}))) ↔ ¬ (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐿)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐿)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖})))))
28	5, 27	raleqbidva 3326	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋) → (∀𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))}) ¬ (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐾)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐾)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖}))) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐿))}) ¬ (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐿)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐿)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖})))))
29	28	ralbidva 3174	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾)) → (∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋∀𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))}) ¬ (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐾)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐾)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖}))) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋∀𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐿))}) ¬ (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐿)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐿)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖})))))
30	29	pm5.32da 578	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋∀𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))}) ¬ (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐾)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐾)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖})))) ↔ (𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋∀𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐿))}) ¬ (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐿)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐿)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖}))))))
31	16	feq3d 6704	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾) ↔ 𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐿)))
32	31	anbi1d 629	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋∀𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐿))}) ¬ (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐿)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐿)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖})))) ↔ (𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐿) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋∀𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐿))}) ¬ (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐿)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐿)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖}))))))
33	30, 32	bitrd 279	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋∀𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))}) ¬ (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐾)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐾)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖})))) ↔ (𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐿) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋∀𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐿))}) ¬ (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐿)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐿)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖}))))))
34		lindfpropd.x	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)
35		eqid 2731	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐾)
36		eqid 2731	. . . 4 ⊢ ( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐾) = ( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐾)
37		eqid 2731	. . . 4 ⊢ (LSpan‘𝐾) = (LSpan‘𝐾)
38		eqid 2731	. . . 4 ⊢ (Scalar‘𝐾) = (Scalar‘𝐾)
39		eqid 2731	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾))
40		eqid 2731	. . . 4 ⊢ (0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) = (0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))
41	35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40	islindf 21587	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 LIndF 𝐾 ↔ (𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋∀𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))}) ¬ (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐾)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐾)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖}))))))
42	21, 34, 41	syl2anc 583	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 LIndF 𝐾 ↔ (𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋∀𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐾))}) ¬ (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐾)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐾)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖}))))))
43		eqid 2731	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝐿) = (Base‘𝐿)
44		eqid 2731	. . . 4 ⊢ ( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐿) = ( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐿)
45		eqid 2731	. . . 4 ⊢ (LSpan‘𝐿) = (LSpan‘𝐿)
46		eqid 2731	. . . 4 ⊢ (Scalar‘𝐿) = (Scalar‘𝐿)
47		eqid 2731	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿))
48		eqid 2731	. . . 4 ⊢ (0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐿)) = (0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐿))
49	43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48	islindf 21587	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐿 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 LIndF 𝐿 ↔ (𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐿) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋∀𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐿))}) ¬ (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐿)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐿)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖}))))))
50	22, 34, 49	syl2anc 583	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 LIndF 𝐿 ↔ (𝑋:dom 𝑋⟶(Base‘𝐿) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋∀𝑘 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)) ∖ {(0_g‘(Scalar‘𝐿))}) ¬ (𝑘( ·_𝑠 ‘𝐿)(𝑋‘𝑖)) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝐿)‘(𝑋 “ (dom 𝑋 ∖ {𝑖}))))))
51	33, 42, 50	3bitr4d 311	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 LIndF 𝐾 ↔ 𝑋 LIndF 𝐿))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1540 ∈ wcel 2105 ∀wral 3060 ∖ cdif 3945 {csn 4628 class class class wbr 5148 dom cdm 5676 “ cima 5679 ⟶wf 6539 ‘cfv 6543 (class class class)co 7412 Basecbs 17149 +_gcplusg 17202 Scalarcsca 17205 ·_𝑠 cvsca 17206 0_gc0g 17390 LSpanclspn 20727 LIndF clindf 21579

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2107 ax-9 2115 ax-10 2136 ax-11 2153 ax-12 2170 ax-ext 2702 ax-rep 5285 ax-sep 5299 ax-nul 5306 ax-pow 5363 ax-pr 5427

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-or 845 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1543 df-fal 1553 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2067 df-mo 2533 df-eu 2562 df-clab 2709 df-cleq 2723 df-clel 2809 df-nfc 2884 df-ne 2940 df-ral 3061 df-rex 3070 df-reu 3376 df-rab 3432 df-v 3475 df-sbc 3778 df-csb 3894 df-dif 3951 df-un 3953 df-in 3955 df-ss 3965 df-nul 4323 df-if 4529 df-pw 4604 df-sn 4629 df-pr 4631 df-op 4635 df-uni 4909 df-int 4951 df-iun 4999 df-br 5149 df-opab 5211 df-mpt 5232 df-id 5574 df-xp 5682 df-rel 5683 df-cnv 5684 df-co 5685 df-dm 5686 df-rn 5687 df-res 5688 df-ima 5689 df-iota 6495 df-fun 6545 df-fn 6546 df-f 6547 df-f1 6548 df-fo 6549 df-f1o 6550 df-fv 6551 df-ov 7415 df-lss 20688 df-lsp 20728 df-lindf 21581

This theorem is referenced by: lindspropd 32774

W3C validator