Theorem rspc2gv 3585

Description: Restricted specialization with two quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Dec-2021.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rspc2gv.1	⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspc2gv	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 𝜑 → 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑉,𝑦   𝑥,𝑊,𝑦   𝜓,𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem rspc2gv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ral 3077	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 𝜑))
2		df-ral 3077	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝜑))
3	2	imbi2i 339	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝜑)))
4	3	albii 1851	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝜑)))
5		19.21v 1971	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝜑)))
6	5	bicomi 227	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝜑)))
7	6	albii 1851	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝜑)))
8		impexp 456	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝜑)))
9		eleq1 2848	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉))
10		eleq1 2848	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊))
11	9, 10	bi2anan9 650	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑊) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)))
12		rspc2gv.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
13	11, 12	imbi12d 347	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝜑) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝜓)))
14	8, 13	bitr3id 288	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝜑)) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝜓)))
15	14	spc2gv 3554	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝜑)) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝜓)))
16	15	pm2.43a 55	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝜑)) → 𝜓))
17	7, 16	biimtrid 245	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝜑)) → 𝜓))
18	4, 17	biimtrid 245	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 𝜑) → 𝜓))
19	1, 18	biimtrid 245	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 𝜑 → 𝜓))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1567   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ∀wral 3076

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077

This theorem is used by:  onelfvnef1  8449  prmidlc  21629  eulplig  31087  irrdiff  38248  ichreuopeq  48555  isuspgrimlem  48993  isubgr3stgrlem4  49067  iscnrm3lem5  50045  iscnrm3r  50056  catprslem  50118  oppcendc  50126  thincmoALT  50537  functhinclem2  50553  fullthinc2  50559  mndtcobeq  50691