Theorem stoic1a 1770

Description: Stoic logic Thema 1 (part a).

The first thema of the four Stoic logic themata, in its basic form, was:

"When from two (assertibles) a third follows, then from either of them together with the contradictory of the conclusion the contradictory of the other follows." (Apuleius Int. 209.9-14), see [Bobzien] p. 117 and https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-ancient/

We will represent thema 1 as two very similar rules stoic1a 1770 and stoic1b 1771 to represent each side. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 16-Feb-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-May-2020.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
stoic1.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
stoic1a	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜃) → ¬ 𝜓)

Proof of Theorem stoic1a

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		stoic1.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)
2	1	ex 412	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))
3	2	con3dimp 408	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜃) → ¬ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396

This theorem is referenced by:  stoic1b  1771  posn  5785  frsn  5787  relimasn  6114  nssdmovg  7632  iblss  25860  midexlem  28718  colhp  28796  clwwlknon0  30125  xaddeq0  32760  xrge0npcan  33006  unccur  37563  lindsenlbs  37575  itg2addnclem2  37632  dvasin  37664  ssnel  44943  icccncfext  45808  dirkercncflem1  46024  fourierdlem81  46108  fourierdlem97  46124  prsal  46239  volico2  46562