Theorem stoic1a 1776

Description: Stoic logic Thema 1 (part a).

The first thema of the four Stoic logic themata, in its basic form, was:

"When from two (assertibles) a third follows, then from either of them together with the contradictory of the conclusion the contradictory of the other follows." (Apuleius Int. 209.9-14), see [Bobzien] p. 117 and https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-ancient/

We will represent thema 1 as two very similar rules stoic1a 1776 and stoic1b 1777 to represent each side. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 16-Feb-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-May-2020.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
stoic1.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
stoic1a	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜃) → ¬ 𝜓)

Proof of Theorem stoic1a

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		stoic1.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)
2	1	ex 412	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))
3	2	con3dimp 408	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜃) → ¬ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396

This theorem is referenced by:  stoic1b  1777  posn  5663  frsn  5665  relimasn  5981  nssdmovg  7432  iblss  24874  midexlem  26957  colhp  27035  clwwlknon0  28358  xaddeq0  30978  xrge0npcan  31205  unccur  35687  lindsenlbs  35699  itg2addnclem2  35756  dvasin  35788  ssnel  42477  icccncfext  43318  dirkercncflem1  43534  fourierdlem81  43618  fourierdlem97  43634  prsal  43749  volico2  44069