Theorem stoic1a 1772

Description: Stoic logic Thema 1 (part a).

The first thema of the four Stoic logic themata, in its basic form, was:

"When from two (assertibles) a third follows, then from either of them together with the contradictory of the conclusion the contradictory of the other follows." (Apuleius Int. 209.9-14), see [Bobzien] p. 117 and https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-ancient/

We will represent thema 1 as two very similar rules stoic1a 1772 and stoic1b 1773 to represent each side. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 16-Feb-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-May-2020.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
stoic1.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
stoic1a	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜃) → ¬ 𝜓)

Proof of Theorem stoic1a

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		stoic1.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)
2	1	ex 412	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))
3	2	con3dimp 408	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜃) → ¬ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396

This theorem is referenced by:  stoic1b  1773  posn  5740  frsn  5742  relimasn  6072  nssdmovg  7589  iblss  25758  midexlem  28671  colhp  28749  clwwlknon0  30074  xaddeq0  32730  xrge0npcan  33015  elrgspnsubrunlem2  33243  constrinvcl  33807  madjusmdetlem2  33859  unccur  37627  lindsenlbs  37639  itg2addnclem2  37696  dvasin  37728  ssnel  45067  icccncfext  45916  dirkercncflem1  46132  fourierdlem81  46216  fourierdlem97  46232  prsal  46347  volico2  46670