Theorem bj-omex2 15623

Description: Using bounded set induction and the strong axiom of infinity, om is a set, that is, we recover ax-infvn 15587 (see bj-2inf 15584 for the equivalence of the latter with bj-omex 15588). (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-omex2	|- om e. _V

Proof of Theorem bj-omex2

Dummy variables x y a are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-inf2 15622	. . 3 |- E. a A. x ( x e. a <-> ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. a x = suc y ) )
2		vex 2766	. . . 4 |- a e. _V
3		bdcv 15494	. . . . 5 |- BOUNDED a
4	3	bj-inf2vn 15620	. . . 4 |- ( a e. _V -> ( A. x ( x e. a <-> ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. a x = suc y ) ) -> a = om ) )
5	2, 4	ax-mp 5	. . 3 |- ( A. x ( x e. a <-> ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. a x = suc y ) ) -> a = om )
6	1, 5	eximii 1616	. 2 |- E. a a = om
7	6	issetri 2772	1 |- om e. _V

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 105   \/ wo 709   A.wal 1362   = wceq 1364   e. wcel 2167   E.wrex 2476   _Vcvv 2763   (/)c0 3450   suc csuc 4400   omcom 4626

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-13 2169  ax-14 2170  ax-ext 2178  ax-nul 4159  ax-pr 4242  ax-un 4468  ax-bd0 15459  ax-bdim 15460  ax-bdor 15462  ax-bdex 15465  ax-bdeq 15466  ax-bdel 15467  ax-bdsb 15468  ax-bdsep 15530  ax-bdsetind 15614  ax-inf2 15622

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-ral 2480  df-rex 2481  df-rab 2484  df-v 2765  df-dif 3159  df-un 3161  df-in 3163  df-ss 3170  df-nul 3451  df-sn 3628  df-pr 3629  df-uni 3840  df-int 3875  df-suc 4406  df-iom 4627  df-bdc 15487  df-bj-ind 15573

This theorem is referenced by: (None)