Theorem bj-omex2 14012

Description: Using bounded set induction and the strong axiom of infinity, om is a set, that is, we recover ax-infvn 13976 (see bj-2inf 13973 for the equivalence of the latter with bj-omex 13977). (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-omex2	|- om e. _V

Proof of Theorem bj-omex2

Dummy variables x y a are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-inf2 14011	. . 3 |- E. a A. x ( x e. a <-> ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. a x = suc y ) )
2		vex 2733	. . . 4 |- a e. _V
3		bdcv 13883	. . . . 5 |- BOUNDED a
4	3	bj-inf2vn 14009	. . . 4 |- ( a e. _V -> ( A. x ( x e. a <-> ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. a x = suc y ) ) -> a = om ) )
5	2, 4	ax-mp 5	. . 3 |- ( A. x ( x e. a <-> ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. a x = suc y ) ) -> a = om )
6	1, 5	eximii 1595	. 2 |- E. a a = om
7	6	issetri 2739	1 |- om e. _V

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 104   \/ wo 703   A.wal 1346   = wceq 1348   e. wcel 2141   E.wrex 2449   _Vcvv 2730   (/)c0 3414   suc csuc 4350   omcom 4574

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 609  ax-in2 610  ax-io 704  ax-5 1440  ax-7 1441  ax-gen 1442  ax-ie1 1486  ax-ie2 1487  ax-8 1497  ax-10 1498  ax-11 1499  ax-i12 1500  ax-bndl 1502  ax-4 1503  ax-17 1519  ax-i9 1523  ax-ial 1527  ax-i5r 1528  ax-13 2143  ax-14 2144  ax-ext 2152  ax-nul 4115  ax-pr 4194  ax-un 4418  ax-bd0 13848  ax-bdim 13849  ax-bdor 13851  ax-bdex 13854  ax-bdeq 13855  ax-bdel 13856  ax-bdsb 13857  ax-bdsep 13919  ax-bdsetind 14003  ax-inf2 14011

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1351  df-nf 1454  df-sb 1756  df-clab 2157  df-cleq 2163  df-clel 2166  df-nfc 2301  df-ral 2453  df-rex 2454  df-rab 2457  df-v 2732  df-dif 3123  df-un 3125  df-in 3127  df-ss 3134  df-nul 3415  df-sn 3589  df-pr 3590  df-uni 3797  df-int 3832  df-suc 4356  df-iom 4575  df-bdc 13876  df-bj-ind 13962

This theorem is referenced by: (None)