Theorem bj-omex2 16112

Description: Using bounded set induction and the strong axiom of infinity, ω is a set, that is, we recover ax-infvn 16076 (see bj-2inf 16073 for the equivalence of the latter with bj-omex 16077). (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-omex2	⊢ ω ∈ V

Proof of Theorem bj-omex2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑎 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-inf2 16111	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑎∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 𝑥 = suc 𝑦))
2		vex 2779	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
3		bdcv 15983	. . . . 5 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑎
4	3	bj-inf2vn 16109	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ V → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → 𝑎 = ω))
5	2, 4	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → 𝑎 = ω)
6	1, 5	eximii 1626	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑎 𝑎 = ω
7	6	issetri 2786	1 ⊢ ω ∈ V

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105   ∨ wo 710  ∀wal 1371   = wceq 1373   ∈ wcel 2178  ∃wrex 2487  Vcvv 2776  ∅c0 3468  suc csuc 4430  ωcom 4656

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-13 2180  ax-14 2181  ax-ext 2189  ax-nul 4186  ax-pr 4269  ax-un 4498  ax-bd0 15948  ax-bdim 15949  ax-bdor 15951  ax-bdex 15954  ax-bdeq 15955  ax-bdel 15956  ax-bdsb 15957  ax-bdsep 16019  ax-bdsetind 16103  ax-inf2 16111

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-clab 2194  df-cleq 2200  df-clel 2203  df-nfc 2339  df-ral 2491  df-rex 2492  df-rab 2495  df-v 2778  df-dif 3176  df-un 3178  df-in 3180  df-ss 3187  df-nul 3469  df-sn 3649  df-pr 3650  df-uni 3865  df-int 3900  df-suc 4436  df-iom 4657  df-bdc 15976  df-bj-ind 16062

This theorem is referenced by: (None)