Theorem bj-omex2 13346

Description: Using bounded set induction and the strong axiom of infinity, ω is a set, that is, we recover ax-infvn 13310 (see bj-2inf 13307 for the equivalence of the latter with bj-omex 13311). (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-omex2	⊢ ω ∈ V

Proof of Theorem bj-omex2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑎 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-inf2 13345	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑎∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 𝑥 = suc 𝑦))
2		vex 2692	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
3		bdcv 13217	. . . . 5 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑎
4	3	bj-inf2vn 13343	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ V → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → 𝑎 = ω))
5	2, 4	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → 𝑎 = ω)
6	1, 5	eximii 1582	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑎 𝑎 = ω
7	6	issetri 2698	1 ⊢ ω ∈ V

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 104   ∨ wo 698  ∀wal 1330   = wceq 1332   ∈ wcel 1481  ∃wrex 2418  Vcvv 2689  ∅c0 3368  suc csuc 4295  ωcom 4512

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-bndl 1487  ax-4 1488  ax-13 1492  ax-14 1493  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516  ax-ext 2122  ax-nul 4062  ax-pr 4139  ax-un 4363  ax-bd0 13182  ax-bdim 13183  ax-bdor 13185  ax-bdex 13188  ax-bdeq 13189  ax-bdel 13190  ax-bdsb 13191  ax-bdsep 13253  ax-bdsetind 13337  ax-inf2 13345

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1335  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737  df-clab 2127  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-nfc 2271  df-ral 2422  df-rex 2423  df-rab 2426  df-v 2691  df-dif 3078  df-un 3080  df-in 3082  df-ss 3089  df-nul 3369  df-sn 3538  df-pr 3539  df-uni 3745  df-int 3780  df-suc 4301  df-iom 4513  df-bdc 13210  df-bj-ind 13296

This theorem is referenced by: (None)