Theorem cbvoprab3 5998

Description: Rule used to change the third bound variable in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2013.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvoprab3.1	|- F/ w ph
cbvoprab3.2	|- F/ z ps
cbvoprab3.3	|- ( z = w -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvoprab3	|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. <. x , y >. , w >. | ps }

Distinct variable groups:   x, z, w   y, z, w

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z, w)   ps( x, y, z, w)

Proof of Theorem cbvoprab3

Dummy variable v is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1542	. . . . . 6 |- F/ w v = <. x , y >.
2		cbvoprab3.1	. . . . . 6 |- F/ w ph
3	1, 2	nfan 1579	. . . . 5 |- F/ w ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ph )
4	3	nfex 1651	. . . 4 |- F/ w E. y ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ph )
5	4	nfex 1651	. . 3 |- F/ w E. x E. y ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ph )
6		nfv 1542	. . . . . 6 |- F/ z v = <. x , y >.
7		cbvoprab3.2	. . . . . 6 |- F/ z ps
8	6, 7	nfan 1579	. . . . 5 |- F/ z ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ps )
9	8	nfex 1651	. . . 4 |- F/ z E. y ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ps )
10	9	nfex 1651	. . 3 |- F/ z E. x E. y ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ps )
11		cbvoprab3.3	. . . . 5 |- ( z = w -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
12	11	anbi2d 464	. . . 4 |- ( z = w -> ( ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) ) )
13	12	2exbidv 1882	. . 3 |- ( z = w -> ( E. x E. y ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> E. x E. y ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) ) )
14	5, 10, 13	cbvopab2 4107	. 2 |- { <. v , z >. | E. x E. y ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } = { <. v , w >. | E. x E. y ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) }
15		dfoprab2 5969	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. v , z >. | E. x E. y ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) }
16		dfoprab2 5969	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , w >. | ps } = { <. v , w >. | E. x E. y ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) }
17	14, 15, 16	3eqtr4i 2227	1 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. <. x , y >. , w >. | ps }

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1364   F/wnf 1474   E.wex 1506   <.cop 3625   {copab 4093   {coprab 5923

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-14 2170  ax-ext 2178  ax-sep 4151  ax-pow 4207  ax-pr 4242

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-v 2765  df-un 3161  df-in 3163  df-ss 3170  df-pw 3607  df-sn 3628  df-pr 3629  df-op 3631  df-opab 4095  df-oprab 5926

This theorem is referenced by:  cbvoprab3v  5999  tposoprab  6338  erovlem  6686