ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  nfimad Unicode version

Theorem nfimad 5019
Description: Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfima 5018. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
nfimad.2  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x A )
nfimad.3  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x B )
Assertion
Ref Expression
nfimad  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x ( A
" B ) )

Proof of Theorem nfimad
Dummy variable  z is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 nfaba1 2345 . . 3  |-  F/_ x { z  |  A. x  z  e.  A }
2 nfaba1 2345 . . 3  |-  F/_ x { z  |  A. x  z  e.  B }
31, 2nfima 5018 . 2  |-  F/_ x
( { z  | 
A. x  z  e.  A } " {
z  |  A. x  z  e.  B }
)
4 nfimad.2 . . 3  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x A )
5 nfimad.3 . . 3  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x B )
6 nfnfc1 2342 . . . . 5  |-  F/ x F/_ x A
7 nfnfc1 2342 . . . . 5  |-  F/ x F/_ x B
86, 7nfan 1579 . . . 4  |-  F/ x
( F/_ x A  /\  F/_ x B )
9 abidnf 2932 . . . . . 6  |-  ( F/_ x A  ->  { z  |  A. x  z  e.  A }  =  A )
109imaeq1d 5009 . . . . 5  |-  ( F/_ x A  ->  ( { z  |  A. x  z  e.  A } " { z  |  A. x  z  e.  B } )  =  ( A " { z  |  A. x  z  e.  B } ) )
11 abidnf 2932 . . . . . 6  |-  ( F/_ x B  ->  { z  |  A. x  z  e.  B }  =  B )
1211imaeq2d 5010 . . . . 5  |-  ( F/_ x B  ->  ( A
" { z  | 
A. x  z  e.  B } )  =  ( A " B
) )
1310, 12sylan9eq 2249 . . . 4  |-  ( (
F/_ x A  /\  F/_ x B )  -> 
( { z  | 
A. x  z  e.  A } " {
z  |  A. x  z  e.  B }
)  =  ( A
" B ) )
148, 13nfceqdf 2338 . . 3  |-  ( (
F/_ x A  /\  F/_ x B )  -> 
( F/_ x ( { z  |  A. x  z  e.  A } " { z  |  A. x  z  e.  B } )  <->  F/_ x ( A " B ) ) )
154, 5, 14syl2anc 411 . 2  |-  ( ph  ->  ( F/_ x ( { z  |  A. x  z  e.  A } " { z  | 
A. x  z  e.  B } )  <->  F/_ x ( A " B ) ) )
163, 15mpbii 148 1  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x ( A
" B ) )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 104    <-> wb 105   A.wal 1362    e. wcel 2167   {cab 2182   F/_wnfc 2326   "cima 4667
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-ext 2178
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-rab 2484  df-v 2765  df-un 3161  df-in 3163  df-ss 3170  df-sn 3629  df-pr 3630  df-op 3632  df-br 4035  df-opab 4096  df-xp 4670  df-cnv 4672  df-dm 4674  df-rn 4675  df-res 4676  df-ima 4677
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator