ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  nfimad Unicode version

Theorem nfimad 5014
Description: Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfima 5013. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
nfimad.2  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x A )
nfimad.3  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x B )
Assertion
Ref Expression
nfimad  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x ( A
" B ) )

Proof of Theorem nfimad
Dummy variable  z is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 nfaba1 2342 . . 3  |-  F/_ x { z  |  A. x  z  e.  A }
2 nfaba1 2342 . . 3  |-  F/_ x { z  |  A. x  z  e.  B }
31, 2nfima 5013 . 2  |-  F/_ x
( { z  | 
A. x  z  e.  A } " {
z  |  A. x  z  e.  B }
)
4 nfimad.2 . . 3  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x A )
5 nfimad.3 . . 3  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x B )
6 nfnfc1 2339 . . . . 5  |-  F/ x F/_ x A
7 nfnfc1 2339 . . . . 5  |-  F/ x F/_ x B
86, 7nfan 1576 . . . 4  |-  F/ x
( F/_ x A  /\  F/_ x B )
9 abidnf 2928 . . . . . 6  |-  ( F/_ x A  ->  { z  |  A. x  z  e.  A }  =  A )
109imaeq1d 5004 . . . . 5  |-  ( F/_ x A  ->  ( { z  |  A. x  z  e.  A } " { z  |  A. x  z  e.  B } )  =  ( A " { z  |  A. x  z  e.  B } ) )
11 abidnf 2928 . . . . . 6  |-  ( F/_ x B  ->  { z  |  A. x  z  e.  B }  =  B )
1211imaeq2d 5005 . . . . 5  |-  ( F/_ x B  ->  ( A
" { z  | 
A. x  z  e.  B } )  =  ( A " B
) )
1310, 12sylan9eq 2246 . . . 4  |-  ( (
F/_ x A  /\  F/_ x B )  -> 
( { z  | 
A. x  z  e.  A } " {
z  |  A. x  z  e.  B }
)  =  ( A
" B ) )
148, 13nfceqdf 2335 . . 3  |-  ( (
F/_ x A  /\  F/_ x B )  -> 
( F/_ x ( { z  |  A. x  z  e.  A } " { z  |  A. x  z  e.  B } )  <->  F/_ x ( A " B ) ) )
154, 5, 14syl2anc 411 . 2  |-  ( ph  ->  ( F/_ x ( { z  |  A. x  z  e.  A } " { z  | 
A. x  z  e.  B } )  <->  F/_ x ( A " B ) ) )
163, 15mpbii 148 1  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x ( A
" B ) )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 104    <-> wb 105   A.wal 1362    e. wcel 2164   {cab 2179   F/_wnfc 2323   "cima 4662
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-ext 2175
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-rab 2481  df-v 2762  df-un 3157  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166  df-sn 3624  df-pr 3625  df-op 3627  df-br 4030  df-opab 4091  df-xp 4665  df-cnv 4667  df-dm 4669  df-rn 4670  df-res 4671  df-ima 4672
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator