Theorem repizf2 4191

Description: Replacement. This version of replacement is stronger than repizf 4145 in the sense that ph does not need to map all values of x in w to a value of y. The resulting set contains those elements for which there is a value of y and in that sense, this theorem combines repizf 4145 with ax-sep 4147. Another variation would be A. x e. w E* y ph -> { y | E. x ( x e. w /\ ph ) } e. _V but we don't have a proof of that yet. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Sep-2018.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
repizf2.1	|- F/ z ph

Assertion

Ref	Expression
repizf2	|- ( A. x e. w E* y ph -> E. z A. x e. { x e. w | E. y ph } E. y e. z ph )

Distinct variable group:   x, y, z, w

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z, w)

Proof of Theorem repizf2

Dummy variable v is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 2763	. . 3 |- w e. _V
2	1	rabex 4173	. 2 |- { x e. w | E. y ph } e. _V
3		repizf2lem 4190	. . . 4 |- ( A. x e. w E* y ph <-> A. x e. { x e. w | E. y ph } E! y ph )
4		nfcv 2336	. . . . . 6 |- F/_ x v
5		nfrab1 2674	. . . . . 6 |- F/_ x { x e. w | E. y ph }
6	4, 5	raleqf 2686	. . . . 5 |- ( v = { x e. w | E. y ph } -> ( A. x e. v E! y ph <-> A. x e. { x e. w | E. y ph } E! y ph ) )
7		repizf2.1	. . . . . 6 |- F/ z ph
8	7	repizf 4145	. . . . 5 |- ( A. x e. v E! y ph -> E. z A. x e. v E. y e. z ph )
9	6, 8	biimtrrdi 164	. . . 4 |- ( v = { x e. w | E. y ph } -> ( A. x e. { x e. w | E. y ph } E! y ph -> E. z A. x e. v E. y e. z ph ) )
10	3, 9	biimtrid 152	. . 3 |- ( v = { x e. w | E. y ph } -> ( A. x e. w E* y ph -> E. z A. x e. v E. y e. z ph ) )
11		df-rab 2481	. . . . . 6 |- { x e. w | E. y ph } = { x | ( x e. w /\ E. y ph ) }
12		nfv 1539	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/ z x e. w
13	7	nfex 1648	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/ z E. y ph
14	12, 13	nfan 1576	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ z ( x e. w /\ E. y ph )
15	14	nfab 2341	. . . . . 6 |- F/_ z { x | ( x e. w /\ E. y ph ) }
16	11, 15	nfcxfr 2333	. . . . 5 |- F/_ z { x e. w | E. y ph }
17	16	nfeq2 2348	. . . 4 |- F/ z v = { x e. w | E. y ph }
18	4, 5	raleqf 2686	. . . 4 |- ( v = { x e. w | E. y ph } -> ( A. x e. v E. y e. z ph <-> A. x e. { x e. w | E. y ph } E. y e. z ph ) )
19	17, 18	exbid 1627	. . 3 |- ( v = { x e. w | E. y ph } -> ( E. z A. x e. v E. y e. z ph <-> E. z A. x e. { x e. w | E. y ph } E. y e. z ph ) )
20	10, 19	sylibd 149	. 2 |- ( v = { x e. w | E. y ph } -> ( A. x e. w E* y ph -> E. z A. x e. { x e. w | E. y ph } E. y e. z ph ) )
21	2, 20	vtocle 2834	1 |- ( A. x e. w E* y ph -> E. z A. x e. { x e. w | E. y ph } E. y e. z ph )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1364   F/wnf 1471   E.wex 1503   E!weu 2042   E*wmo 2043   {cab 2179   A.wral 2472   E.wrex 2473   {crab 2476

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-ext 2175  ax-coll 4144  ax-sep 4147

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-mo 2046  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ral 2477  df-rab 2481  df-v 2762  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166

This theorem is referenced by: (None)