P. 42 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 4101-4200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	nfopab 4101*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) Remove disjoint variable conditions. (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- F/ z ph   =>    |- F/_ z { <. x , y >. | ph }
Theorem	nfopab1 4102	The first abstraction variable in an ordered-pair class abstraction (class builder) is effectively not free. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x { <. x , y >. | ph }
Theorem	nfopab2 4103	The second abstraction variable in an ordered-pair class abstraction (class builder) is effectively not free. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ y { <. x , y >. | ph }
Theorem	cbvopab 4104*	Rule used to change bound variables in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)
|- F/ z ph   &    |- F/ w ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ y ps   &    |- ( ( x = z /\ y = w ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. x , y >. | ph } = { <. z , w >. | ps }
Theorem	cbvopabv 4105*	Rule used to change bound variables in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1996.)
|- ( ( x = z /\ y = w ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. x , y >. | ph } = { <. z , w >. | ps }
Theorem	cbvopab1 4106*	Change first bound variable in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ z ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = z -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. x , y >. | ph } = { <. z , y >. | ps }
Theorem	cbvopab2 4107*	Change second bound variable in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2013.)
|- F/ z ph   &    |- F/ y ps   &    |- ( y = z -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. x , y >. | ph } = { <. x , z >. | ps }
Theorem	cbvopab1s 4108*	Change first bound variable in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.)
|- { <. x , y >. | ph } = { <. z , y >. | [ z / x ] ph }
Theorem	cbvopab1v 4109*	Rule used to change the first bound variable in an ordered pair abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 4-Apr-2007.)
|- ( x = z -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. x , y >. | ph } = { <. z , y >. | ps }
Theorem	cbvopab2v 4110*	Rule used to change the second bound variable in an ordered pair abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1999.)
|- ( y = z -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. x , y >. | ph } = { <. x , z >. | ps }
Theorem	csbopabg 4111*	Move substitution into a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2016.)
|- ( A e. V -> [_ A / x ]_ { <. y , z >. | ph } = { <. y , z >. | [. A / x ]. ph } )
Theorem	unopab 4112	Union of two ordered pair class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)
|- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } u. { <. x , y >. | ps } ) = { <. x , y >. | ( ph \/ ps ) }
Theorem	mpteq12f 4113	An equality theorem for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Dec-2013.)
|- ( ( A. x A = C /\ A. x e. A B = D ) -> ( x e. A |-> B ) = ( x e. C |-> D ) )
Theorem	mpteq12dva 4114*	An equality inference for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> B = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A |-> B ) = ( x e. C |-> D ) )
Theorem	mpteq12dv 4115*	An equality inference for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Dec-2013.)
|- ( ph -> A = C )   &    |- ( ph -> B = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A |-> B ) = ( x e. C |-> D ) )
Theorem	mpteq12 4116*	An equality theorem for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2013.)
|- ( ( A = C /\ A. x e. A B = D ) -> ( x e. A |-> B ) = ( x e. C |-> D ) )
Theorem	mpteq1 4117*	An equality theorem for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Dec-2013.)
|- ( A = B -> ( x e. A |-> C ) = ( x e. B |-> C ) )
Theorem	mpteq1d 4118*	An equality theorem for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A |-> C ) = ( x e. B |-> C ) )
Theorem	mpteq2ia 4119	An equality inference for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Dec-2013.)
|- ( x e. A -> B = C )   =>    |- ( x e. A |-> B ) = ( x e. A |-> C )
Theorem	mpteq2i 4120	An equality inference for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Dec-2013.)
|- B = C   =>    |- ( x e. A |-> B ) = ( x e. A |-> C )
Theorem	mpteq12i 4121	An equality inference for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Dec-2013.)
|- A = C   &    |- B = D   =>    |- ( x e. A |-> B ) = ( x e. C |-> D )
Theorem	mpteq2da 4122	Slightly more general equality inference for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 14-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Dec-2013.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A |-> B ) = ( x e. A |-> C ) )
Theorem	mpteq2dva 4123*	Slightly more general equality inference for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Apr-2012.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A |-> B ) = ( x e. A |-> C ) )
Theorem	mpteq2dv 4124*	An equality inference for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
|- ( ph -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A |-> B ) = ( x e. A |-> C ) )
Theorem	nfmpt 4125*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/_ x ( y e. A |-> B )
Theorem	nfmpt1 4126	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-Feb-2008.)
|- F/_ x ( x e. A |-> B )
Theorem	cbvmptf 4127*	Rule to change the bound variable in a maps-to function, using implicit substitution. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Mar-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ y B   &    |- F/_ x C   &    |- ( x = y -> B = C )   =>    |- ( x e. A |-> B ) = ( y e. A |-> C )
Theorem	cbvmpt 4128*	Rule to change the bound variable in a maps-to function, using implicit substitution. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2011.)
|- F/_ y B   &    |- F/_ x C   &    |- ( x = y -> B = C )   =>    |- ( x e. A |-> B ) = ( y e. A |-> C )
Theorem	cbvmptv 4129*	Rule to change the bound variable in a maps-to function, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2013.)
|- ( x = y -> B = C )   =>    |- ( x e. A |-> B ) = ( y e. A |-> C )
Theorem	mptv 4130*	Function with universal domain in maps-to notation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2013.)
|- ( x e. _V |-> B ) = { <. x , y >. | y = B }
2.1.24  Transitive classes
Syntax	wtr 4131	Extend wff notation to include transitive classes. Notation from [TakeutiZaring] p. 35.
wff Tr A
Definition	df-tr 4132	Define the transitive class predicate. Definition of [Enderton] p. 71 extended to arbitrary classes. For alternate definitions, see dftr2 4133 (which is suggestive of the word "transitive"), dftr3 4135, dftr4 4136, and dftr5 4134. The term "complete" is used instead of "transitive" in Definition 3 of [Suppes] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-1993.)
|- ( Tr A <-> U. A C_ A )
Theorem	dftr2 4133*	An alternate way of defining a transitive class. Exercise 7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)
|- ( Tr A <-> A. x A. y ( ( x e. y /\ y e. A ) -> x e. A ) )
Theorem	dftr5 4134*	An alternate way of defining a transitive class. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2004.)
|- ( Tr A <-> A. x e. A A. y e. x y e. A )
Theorem	dftr3 4135*	An alternate way of defining a transitive class. Definition 7.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 35. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-1993.)
|- ( Tr A <-> A. x e. A x C_ A )
Theorem	dftr4 4136	An alternate way of defining a transitive class. Definition of [Enderton] p. 71. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-1993.)
|- ( Tr A <-> A C_ ~P A )
Theorem	treq 4137	Equality theorem for the transitive class predicate. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1993.)
|- ( A = B -> ( Tr A <-> Tr B ) )
Theorem	trel 4138	In a transitive class, the membership relation is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
|- ( Tr A -> ( ( B e. C /\ C e. A ) -> B e. A ) )
Theorem	trel3 4139	In a transitive class, the membership relation is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-1994.)
|- ( Tr A -> ( ( B e. C /\ C e. D /\ D e. A ) -> B e. A ) )
Theorem	trss 4140	An element of a transitive class is a subset of the class. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.)
|- ( Tr A -> ( B e. A -> B C_ A ) )
Theorem	trin 4141	The intersection of transitive classes is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1994.)
|- ( ( Tr A /\ Tr B ) -> Tr ( A i^i B ) )
Theorem	tr0 4142	The empty set is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1993.)
|- Tr (/)
Theorem	trv 4143	The universe is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)
|- Tr _V
Theorem	triun 4144*	The indexed union of a class of transitive sets is transitive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
|- ( A. x e. A Tr B -> Tr U_ x e. A B )
Theorem	truni 4145*	The union of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Exercise 5(a) of [Enderton] p. 73. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Feb-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
|- ( A. x e. A Tr x -> Tr U. A )
Theorem	trint 4146*	The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Exercise 5(b) of [Enderton] p. 73. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Feb-2011.)
|- ( A. x e. A Tr x -> Tr |^| A )
Theorem	trintssm 4147*	Any inhabited transitive class includes its intersection. Similar to Exercise 3 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 44 (which mistakenly does not include the inhabitedness hypothesis). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Aug-2018.)
|- ( ( Tr A /\ E. x x e. A ) -> |^| A C_ A )
2.2  IZF Set Theory - add the Axioms of Collection and Separation
2.2.1  Introduce the Axiom of Collection
Axiom	ax-coll 4148*	Axiom of Collection. Axiom 7 of [Crosilla], p. "Axioms of CZF and IZF" (with unnecessary quantifier removed). It is similar to bnd 4205 but uses a freeness hypothesis in place of one of the distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2018.)
|- F/ b ph   =>    |- ( A. x e. a E. y ph -> E. b A. x e. a E. y e. b ph )
Theorem	repizf 4149*	Axiom of Replacement. Axiom 7' of [Crosilla], p. "Axioms of CZF and IZF" (with unnecessary quantifier removed). In our context this is not an axiom, but a theorem proved from ax-coll 4148. It is identical to zfrep6 4150 except for the choice of a freeness hypothesis rather than a disjoint variable condition between b and ph. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2018.)
|- F/ b ph   =>    |- ( A. x e. a E! y ph -> E. b A. x e. a E. y e. b ph )
Theorem	zfrep6 4150*	A version of the Axiom of Replacement. Normally ph would have free variables x and y. Axiom 6 of [Kunen] p. 12. The Separation Scheme ax-sep 4151 cannot be derived from this version and must be stated as a separate axiom in an axiom system (such as Kunen's) that uses this version. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2003.)
|- ( A. x e. z E! y ph -> E. w A. x e. z E. y e. w ph )
2.2.2  Introduce the Axiom of Separation
Axiom	ax-sep 4151*	The Axiom of Separation of IZF set theory. Axiom 6 of [Crosilla], p. "Axioms of CZF and IZF" (with unnecessary quantifier removed, and with a F/ y ph condition replaced by a disjoint variable condition between y and ph). The Separation Scheme is a weak form of Frege's Axiom of Comprehension, conditioning it (with x e. z) so that it asserts the existence of a collection only if it is smaller than some other collection z that already exists. This prevents Russell's paradox ru 2988. In some texts, this scheme is called "Aussonderung" or the Subset Axiom. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2006.)
|- E. y A. x ( x e. y <-> ( x e. z /\ ph ) )
Theorem	axsep2 4152*	A less restrictive version of the Separation Scheme ax-sep 4151, where variables x and z can both appear free in the wff ph, which can therefore be thought of as ph ( x , z ). This version was derived from the more restrictive ax-sep 4151 with no additional set theory axioms. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2016.)
|- E. y A. x ( x e. y <-> ( x e. z /\ ph ) )
Theorem	zfauscl 4153*	Separation Scheme (Aussonderung) using a class variable. To derive this from ax-sep 4151, we invoke the Axiom of Extensionality (indirectly via vtocl 2818), which is needed for the justification of class variable notation. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- E. y A. x ( x e. y <-> ( x e. A /\ ph ) )
Theorem	bm1.3ii 4154*	Convert implication to equivalence using the Separation Scheme (Aussonderung) ax-sep 4151. Similar to Theorem 1.3ii of [BellMachover] p. 463. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- E. x A. y ( ph -> y e. x )   =>    |- E. x A. y ( y e. x <-> ph )
Theorem	a9evsep 4155*	Derive a weakened version of ax-i9 1544, where x and y must be distinct, from Separation ax-sep 4151 and Extensionality ax-ext 2178. The theorem -. A. x -. x = y also holds (ax9vsep 4156), but in intuitionistic logic E. x x = y is stronger. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Aug-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- E. x x = y
Theorem	ax9vsep 4156*	Derive a weakened version of ax-9 1545, where x and y must be distinct, from Separation ax-sep 4151 and Extensionality ax-ext 2178. In intuitionistic logic a9evsep 4155 is stronger and also holds. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- -. A. x -. x = y
2.2.3  Derive the Null Set Axiom
Theorem	zfnuleu 4157*	Show the uniqueness of the empty set (using the Axiom of Extensionality via bm1.1 2181 to strengthen the hypothesis in the form of axnul 4158). (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2007.)
|- E. x A. y -. y e. x   =>    |- E! x A. y -. y e. x
Theorem	axnul 4158*	The Null Set Axiom of ZF set theory: there exists a set with no elements. Axiom of Empty Set of [Enderton] p. 18. In some textbooks, this is presented as a separate axiom; here we show it can be derived from Separation ax-sep 4151. This version of the Null Set Axiom tells us that at least one empty set exists, but does not tell us that it is unique - we need the Axiom of Extensionality to do that (see zfnuleu 4157). This theorem should not be referenced by any proof. Instead, use ax-nul 4159 below so that the uses of the Null Set Axiom can be more easily identified. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 3-Feb-2008.) (Revised by NM, 4-Feb-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- E. x A. y -. y e. x
Axiom	ax-nul 4159*	The Null Set Axiom of IZF set theory. It was derived as axnul 4158 above and is therefore redundant, but we state it as a separate axiom here so that its uses can be identified more easily. Axiom 4 of [Crosilla] p. "Axioms of CZF and IZF". (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2003.)
|- E. x A. y -. y e. x
Theorem	0ex 4160	The Null Set Axiom of ZF set theory: the empty set exists. Corollary 5.16 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 20. For the unabbreviated version, see ax-nul 4159. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
|- (/) e. _V
Theorem	csbexga 4161	The existence of proper substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ A. x B e. W ) -> [_ A / x ]_ B e. _V )
Theorem	csbexa 4162	The existence of proper substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- [_ A / x ]_ B e. _V
2.2.4  Theorems requiring subset and intersection existence
Theorem	nalset 4163*	No set contains all sets. Theorem 41 of [Suppes] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1993.)
|- -. E. x A. y y e. x
Theorem	vnex 4164	The universal class does not exist as a set. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2005.)
|- -. E. x x = _V
Theorem	vprc 4165	The universal class is not a member of itself (and thus is not a set). Proposition 5.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 21; our proof, however, does not depend on the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1993.)
|- -. _V e. _V
Theorem	nvel 4166	The universal class does not belong to any class. (Contributed by FL, 31-Dec-2006.)
|- -. _V e. A
Theorem	inex1 4167	Separation Scheme (Aussonderung) using class notation. Compare Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A i^i B ) e. _V
Theorem	inex2 4168	Separation Scheme (Aussonderung) using class notation. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-1994.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( B i^i A ) e. _V
Theorem	inex1g 4169	Closed-form, generalized Separation Scheme. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1995.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A i^i B ) e. _V )
Theorem	ssex 4170	The subset of a set is also a set. Exercise 3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. This is one way to express the Axiom of Separation ax-sep 4151 (a.k.a. Subset Axiom). (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-1994.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A C_ B -> A e. _V )
Theorem	ssexi 4171	The subset of a set is also a set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-1993.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- A C_ B   =>    |- A e. _V
Theorem	ssexg 4172	The subset of a set is also a set. Exercise 3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22 (generalized). (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
|- ( ( A C_ B /\ B e. C ) -> A e. _V )
Theorem	ssexd 4173	A subclass of a set is a set. Deduction form of ssexg 4172. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> B e. C )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. _V )
Theorem	difexg 4174	Existence of a difference. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A \ B ) e. _V )
Theorem	zfausab 4175*	Separation Scheme (Aussonderung) in terms of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- { x | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } e. _V
Theorem	rabexg 4176*	Separation Scheme in terms of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.)
|- ( A e. V -> { x e. A | ph } e. _V )
Theorem	rabex 4177*	Separation Scheme in terms of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-1996.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- { x e. A | ph } e. _V
Theorem	rabexd 4178*	Separation Scheme in terms of a restricted class abstraction, deduction form of rabex2 4179. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jul-2019.)
|- B = { x e. A | ps }   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   =>    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )
Theorem	rabex2 4179*	Separation Scheme in terms of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 26-Mar-2021.)
|- B = { x e. A | ps }   &    |- A e. _V   =>    |- B e. _V
Theorem	rab2ex 4180*	A class abstraction based on a class abstraction based on a set is a set. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 26-Mar-2021.)
|- B = { y e. A | ps }   &    |- A e. _V   =>    |- { x e. B | ph } e. _V
Theorem	elssabg 4181*	Membership in a class abstraction involving a subset. Unlike elabg 2910, A does not have to be a set. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( B e. V -> ( A e. { x | ( x C_ B /\ ph ) } <-> ( A C_ B /\ ps ) ) )
Theorem	inteximm 4182*	The intersection of an inhabited class exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Aug-2018.)
|- ( E. x x e. A -> |^| A e. _V )
Theorem	intexr 4183	If the intersection of a class exists, the class is nonempty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Aug-2018.)
|- ( |^| A e. _V -> A =/= (/) )
Theorem	intnexr 4184	If a class intersection is the universe, it is not a set. In classical logic this would be an equivalence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Aug-2018.)
|- ( |^| A = _V -> -. |^| A e. _V )
Theorem	intexabim 4185	The intersection of an inhabited class abstraction exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Aug-2018.)
|- ( E. x ph -> |^| { x | ph } e. _V )
Theorem	intexrabim 4186	The intersection of an inhabited restricted class abstraction exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Aug-2018.)
|- ( E. x e. A ph -> |^| { x e. A | ph } e. _V )
Theorem	iinexgm 4187*	The existence of an indexed union. x is normally a free-variable parameter in B, which should be read B ( x ). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Aug-2018.)
|- ( ( E. x x e. A /\ A. x e. A B e. C ) -> |^|_ x e. A B e. _V )
Theorem	inuni 4188*	The intersection of a union U. A with a class B is equal to the union of the intersections of each element of A with B. (Contributed by FL, 24-Mar-2007.)
|- ( U. A i^i B ) = U. { x | E. y e. A x = ( y i^i B ) }
Theorem	elpw2g 4189	Membership in a power class. Theorem 86 of [Suppes] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2000.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( A e. ~P B <-> A C_ B ) )
Theorem	elpw2 4190	Membership in a power class. Theorem 86 of [Suppes] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2007.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. ~P B <-> A C_ B )
Theorem	elpwi2 4191	Membership in a power class. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-May-2024.)
|- B e. V   &    |- A C_ B   =>    |- A e. ~P B
Theorem	pwnss 4192	The power set of a set is never a subset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> -. ~P A C_ A )
Theorem	pwne 4193	No set equals its power set. The sethood antecedent is necessary; compare pwv 3838. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- ( A e. V -> ~P A =/= A )
Theorem	repizf2lem 4194	Lemma for repizf2 4195. If we have a function-like proposition which provides at most one value of y for each x in a set w, we can change "at most one" to "exactly one" by restricting the values of x to those values for which the proposition provides a value of y. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Sep-2018.)
|- ( A. x e. w E* y ph <-> A. x e. { x e. w | E. y ph } E! y ph )
Theorem	repizf2 4195*	Replacement. This version of replacement is stronger than repizf 4149 in the sense that ph does not need to map all values of x in w to a value of y. The resulting set contains those elements for which there is a value of y and in that sense, this theorem combines repizf 4149 with ax-sep 4151. Another variation would be A. x e. w E* y ph -> { y | E. x ( x e. w /\ ph ) } e. _V but we don't have a proof of that yet. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Sep-2018.)
|- F/ z ph   =>    |- ( A. x e. w E* y ph -> E. z A. x e. { x e. w | E. y ph } E. y e. z ph )
2.2.5  Theorems requiring empty set existence
Theorem	class2seteq 4196*	Equality theorem for classes and sets . (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2005.) (Proof shortened by Raph Levien, 30-Jun-2006.)
|- ( A e. V -> { x e. A | A e. _V } = A )
Theorem	0elpw 4197	Every power class contains the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2007.)
|- (/) e. ~P A
Theorem	0nep0 4198	The empty set and its power set are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.)
|- (/) =/= { (/) }
Theorem	0inp0 4199	Something cannot be equal to both the null set and the power set of the null set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2003.)
|- ( A = (/) -> -. A = { (/) } )
Theorem	unidif0 4200	The removal of the empty set from a class does not affect its union. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-2004.)
|- U. ( A \ { (/) } ) = U. A