Theorem resopab2 4993

Description: Restriction of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2007.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
resopab2	|- ( A C_ B -> ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. B /\ ph ) } |` A ) = { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, A   x, B, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)

Proof of Theorem resopab2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resopab 4990	. 2 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. B /\ ph ) } |` A ) = { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ( x e. B /\ ph ) ) }
2		ssel 3177	. . . . . 6 |- ( A C_ B -> ( x e. A -> x e. B ) )
3	2	pm4.71d 393	. . . . 5 |- ( A C_ B -> ( x e. A <-> ( x e. A /\ x e. B ) ) )
4	3	anbi1d 465	. . . 4 |- ( A C_ B -> ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) <-> ( ( x e. A /\ x e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
5		anass 401	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( x e. A /\ x e. B ) /\ ph ) <-> ( x e. A /\ ( x e. B /\ ph ) ) )
6	4, 5	bitr2di 197	. . 3 |- ( A C_ B -> ( ( x e. A /\ ( x e. B /\ ph ) ) <-> ( x e. A /\ ph ) ) )
7	6	opabbidv 4099	. 2 |- ( A C_ B -> { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ( x e. B /\ ph ) ) } = { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } )
8	1, 7	eqtrid 2241	1 |- ( A C_ B -> ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. B /\ ph ) } |` A ) = { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1364   e. wcel 2167   C_ wss 3157   {copab 4093   |` cres 4665

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-14 2170  ax-ext 2178  ax-sep 4151  ax-pow 4207  ax-pr 4242

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-ral 2480  df-rex 2481  df-v 2765  df-un 3161  df-in 3163  df-ss 3170  df-pw 3607  df-sn 3628  df-pr 3629  df-op 3631  df-opab 4095  df-xp 4669  df-rel 4670  df-res 4675

This theorem is referenced by:  resmpt  4994