![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > resopab2 | GIF version |
Description: Restriction of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2007.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
resopab2 | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | resopab 4987 | . 2 ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))} | |
2 | ssel 3174 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
3 | 2 | pm4.71d 393 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) |
4 | 3 | anbi1d 465 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))) |
5 | anass 401 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
6 | 4, 5 | bitr2di 197 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
7 | 6 | opabbidv 4096 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))} = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
8 | 1, 7 | eqtrid 2238 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 = wceq 1364 ∈ wcel 2164 ⊆ wss 3154 {copab 4090 ↾ cres 4662 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1458 ax-7 1459 ax-gen 1460 ax-ie1 1504 ax-ie2 1505 ax-8 1515 ax-10 1516 ax-11 1517 ax-i12 1518 ax-bndl 1520 ax-4 1521 ax-17 1537 ax-i9 1541 ax-ial 1545 ax-i5r 1546 ax-14 2167 ax-ext 2175 ax-sep 4148 ax-pow 4204 ax-pr 4239 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 982 df-tru 1367 df-nf 1472 df-sb 1774 df-clab 2180 df-cleq 2186 df-clel 2189 df-nfc 2325 df-ral 2477 df-rex 2478 df-v 2762 df-un 3158 df-in 3160 df-ss 3167 df-pw 3604 df-sn 3625 df-pr 3626 df-op 3628 df-opab 4092 df-xp 4666 df-rel 4667 df-res 4672 |
This theorem is referenced by: resmpt 4991 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |