ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  resopab2 GIF version

Theorem resopab2 4834
Description: Restriction of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2007.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
resopab2 (𝐴𝐵 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)})
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem resopab2
StepHypRef Expression
1 resopab 4831 . 2 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑))}
2 ssel 3059 . . . . . 6 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵))
32pm4.71d 388 . . . . 5 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝑥𝐴 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵)))
43anbi1d 458 . . . 4 (𝐴𝐵 → ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)))
5 anass 396 . . . 4 (((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)))
64, 5syl6rbb 196 . . 3 (𝐴𝐵 → ((𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)))
76opabbidv 3962 . 2 (𝐴𝐵 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑))} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)})
81, 7syl5eq 2160 1 (𝐴𝐵 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)})
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 103   = wceq 1314  wcel 1463  wss 3039  {copab 3956  cres 4509
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 681  ax-5 1406  ax-7 1407  ax-gen 1408  ax-ie1 1452  ax-ie2 1453  ax-8 1465  ax-10 1466  ax-11 1467  ax-i12 1468  ax-bndl 1469  ax-4 1470  ax-14 1475  ax-17 1489  ax-i9 1493  ax-ial 1497  ax-i5r 1498  ax-ext 2097  ax-sep 4014  ax-pow 4066  ax-pr 4099
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 947  df-tru 1317  df-nf 1420  df-sb 1719  df-clab 2102  df-cleq 2108  df-clel 2111  df-nfc 2245  df-ral 2396  df-rex 2397  df-v 2660  df-un 3043  df-in 3045  df-ss 3052  df-pw 3480  df-sn 3501  df-pr 3502  df-op 3504  df-opab 3958  df-xp 4513  df-rel 4514  df-res 4519
This theorem is referenced by:  resmpt  4835
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator