Theorem tfrlem3-2d 6332

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion which changes a bound variable (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3-2d.1	|- ( ph -> A. x ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3-2d	|- ( ph -> ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, g, F

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, g)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3-2d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3-2d.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A. x ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) )
2		fveq2 5531	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = g -> ( F ` x ) = ( F ` g ) )
3	2	eleq1d 2258	. . . . 5 |- ( x = g -> ( ( F ` x ) e. _V <-> ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )
4	3	anbi2d 464	. . . 4 |- ( x = g -> ( ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) <-> ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) ) )
5	4	cbvalv 1929	. . 3 |- ( A. x ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) <-> A. g ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )
6	1, 5	sylib 122	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. g ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )
7	6	19.21bi 1569	1 |- ( ph -> ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   A.wal 1362   e. wcel 2160   _Vcvv 2752   Fun wfun 5226   ` cfv 5232

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-ext 2171

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2176  df-cleq 2182  df-clel 2185  df-nfc 2321  df-rex 2474  df-v 2754  df-un 3148  df-sn 3613  df-pr 3614  df-op 3616  df-uni 3825  df-br 4019  df-iota 5193  df-fv 5240

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlemisucfn  6344  tfrlemisucaccv  6345  tfrlemibxssdm  6347  tfrlemibfn  6348  tfrlemi14d  6353