Theorem tfrlem3-2d 6421

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion which changes a bound variable (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3-2d.1	|- ( ph -> A. x ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3-2d	|- ( ph -> ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, g, F

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, g)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3-2d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3-2d.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A. x ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) )
2		fveq2 5599	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = g -> ( F ` x ) = ( F ` g ) )
3	2	eleq1d 2276	. . . . 5 |- ( x = g -> ( ( F ` x ) e. _V <-> ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )
4	3	anbi2d 464	. . . 4 |- ( x = g -> ( ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) <-> ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) ) )
5	4	cbvalv 1942	. . 3 |- ( A. x ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) <-> A. g ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )
6	1, 5	sylib 122	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. g ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )
7	6	19.21bi 1582	1 |- ( ph -> ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   A.wal 1371   e. wcel 2178   _Vcvv 2776   Fun wfun 5284   ` cfv 5290

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-ext 2189

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-clab 2194  df-cleq 2200  df-clel 2203  df-nfc 2339  df-rex 2492  df-v 2778  df-un 3178  df-sn 3649  df-pr 3650  df-op 3652  df-uni 3865  df-br 4060  df-iota 5251  df-fv 5298

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlemisucfn  6433  tfrlemisucaccv  6434  tfrlemibxssdm  6436  tfrlemibfn  6437  tfrlemi14d  6442