Theorem tfrlem3-2d 6398

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion which changes a bound variable (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3-2d.1	|- ( ph -> A. x ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3-2d	|- ( ph -> ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, g, F

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, g)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3-2d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3-2d.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A. x ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) )
2		fveq2 5576	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = g -> ( F ` x ) = ( F ` g ) )
3	2	eleq1d 2274	. . . . 5 |- ( x = g -> ( ( F ` x ) e. _V <-> ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )
4	3	anbi2d 464	. . . 4 |- ( x = g -> ( ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) <-> ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) ) )
5	4	cbvalv 1941	. . 3 |- ( A. x ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) <-> A. g ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )
6	1, 5	sylib 122	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. g ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )
7	6	19.21bi 1581	1 |- ( ph -> ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   A.wal 1371   e. wcel 2176   _Vcvv 2772   Fun wfun 5265   ` cfv 5271

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1470  ax-7 1471  ax-gen 1472  ax-ie1 1516  ax-ie2 1517  ax-8 1527  ax-10 1528  ax-11 1529  ax-i12 1530  ax-bndl 1532  ax-4 1533  ax-17 1549  ax-i9 1553  ax-ial 1557  ax-i5r 1558  ax-ext 2187

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1484  df-sb 1786  df-clab 2192  df-cleq 2198  df-clel 2201  df-nfc 2337  df-rex 2490  df-v 2774  df-un 3170  df-sn 3639  df-pr 3640  df-op 3642  df-uni 3851  df-br 4045  df-iota 5232  df-fv 5279

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlemisucfn  6410  tfrlemisucaccv  6411  tfrlemibxssdm  6413  tfrlemibfn  6414  tfrlemi14d  6419