Theorem tfrlem3-2d 6365

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion which changes a bound variable (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3-2d.1	|- ( ph -> A. x ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3-2d	|- ( ph -> ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, g, F

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, g)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3-2d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3-2d.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A. x ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) )
2		fveq2 5554	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = g -> ( F ` x ) = ( F ` g ) )
3	2	eleq1d 2262	. . . . 5 |- ( x = g -> ( ( F ` x ) e. _V <-> ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )
4	3	anbi2d 464	. . . 4 |- ( x = g -> ( ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) <-> ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) ) )
5	4	cbvalv 1929	. . 3 |- ( A. x ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) <-> A. g ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )
6	1, 5	sylib 122	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. g ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )
7	6	19.21bi 1569	1 |- ( ph -> ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   A.wal 1362   e. wcel 2164   _Vcvv 2760   Fun wfun 5248   ` cfv 5254

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-ext 2175

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-rex 2478  df-v 2762  df-un 3157  df-sn 3624  df-pr 3625  df-op 3627  df-uni 3836  df-br 4030  df-iota 5215  df-fv 5262

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlemisucfn  6377  tfrlemisucaccv  6378  tfrlemibxssdm  6380  tfrlemibfn  6381  tfrlemi14d  6386