Theorem tfrlem3 6216

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let A be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in A for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3.1	|- A = { f | E. x e. On ( f Fn x /\ A. y e. x ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) ) }

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3	|- A = { g | E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) }

Distinct variable groups:   A, g   f, g, w, x, y, z, F

Allowed substitution hints:   A( x, y, z, w, f)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3.1	. . 3 |- A = { f | E. x e. On ( f Fn x /\ A. y e. x ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) ) }
2		vex 2692	. . 3 |- g e. _V
3	1, 2	tfrlem3a 6215	. 2 |- ( g e. A <-> E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) )
4	3	abbi2i 2255	1 |- A = { g | E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 103   = wceq 1332   {cab 2126   A.wral 2417   E.wrex 2418   Oncon0 4293   |` cres 4549   Fn wfn 5126   ` cfv 5131

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-bndl 1487  ax-4 1488  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516  ax-ext 2122

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 965  df-tru 1335  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737  df-clab 2127  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-nfc 2271  df-ral 2422  df-rex 2423  df-v 2691  df-un 3080  df-in 3082  df-ss 3089  df-sn 3538  df-pr 3539  df-op 3541  df-uni 3745  df-br 3938  df-opab 3998  df-xp 4553  df-rel 4554  df-cnv 4555  df-co 4556  df-dm 4557  df-res 4559  df-iota 5096  df-fun 5133  df-fn 5134  df-fv 5139

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem4  6218  tfrlem8  6223  tfrlemi1  6237  tfrexlem  6239  tfri1d  6240  tfrex  6273