Theorem tfrlem3 6476

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let A be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in A for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3.1	|- A = { f | E. x e. On ( f Fn x /\ A. y e. x ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) ) }

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3	|- A = { g | E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) }

Distinct variable groups:   A, g   f, g, w, x, y, z, F

Allowed substitution hints:   A( x, y, z, w, f)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3.1	. . 3 |- A = { f | E. x e. On ( f Fn x /\ A. y e. x ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) ) }
2		vex 2805	. . 3 |- g e. _V
3	1, 2	tfrlem3a 6475	. 2 |- ( g e. A <-> E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) )
4	3	abbi2i 2346	1 |- A = { g | E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1397   {cab 2217   A.wral 2510   E.wrex 2511   Oncon0 4460   |` cres 4727   Fn wfn 5321   ` cfv 5326

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-ext 2213

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1006  df-tru 1400  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ral 2515  df-rex 2516  df-v 2804  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676  df-op 3678  df-uni 3894  df-br 4089  df-opab 4151  df-xp 4731  df-rel 4732  df-cnv 4733  df-co 4734  df-dm 4735  df-res 4737  df-iota 5286  df-fun 5328  df-fn 5329  df-fv 5334

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem4  6478  tfrlem8  6483  tfrlemi1  6497  tfrexlem  6499  tfri1d  6500  tfrex  6533