Theorem tfrlem3 6366

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let A be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in A for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3.1	|- A = { f | E. x e. On ( f Fn x /\ A. y e. x ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) ) }

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3	|- A = { g | E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) }

Distinct variable groups:   A, g   f, g, w, x, y, z, F

Allowed substitution hints:   A( x, y, z, w, f)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3.1	. . 3 |- A = { f | E. x e. On ( f Fn x /\ A. y e. x ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) ) }
2		vex 2763	. . 3 |- g e. _V
3	1, 2	tfrlem3a 6365	. 2 |- ( g e. A <-> E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) )
4	3	abbi2i 2308	1 |- A = { g | E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1364   {cab 2179   A.wral 2472   E.wrex 2473   Oncon0 4395   |` cres 4662   Fn wfn 5250   ` cfv 5255

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-ext 2175

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-v 2762  df-un 3158  df-in 3160  df-ss 3167  df-sn 3625  df-pr 3626  df-op 3628  df-uni 3837  df-br 4031  df-opab 4092  df-xp 4666  df-rel 4667  df-cnv 4668  df-co 4669  df-dm 4670  df-res 4672  df-iota 5216  df-fun 5257  df-fn 5258  df-fv 5263

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem4  6368  tfrlem8  6373  tfrlemi1  6387  tfrexlem  6389  tfri1d  6390  tfrex  6423