Theorem tfrlem3 6369

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let A be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in A for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3.1	|- A = { f | E. x e. On ( f Fn x /\ A. y e. x ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) ) }

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3	|- A = { g | E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) }

Distinct variable groups:   A, g   f, g, w, x, y, z, F

Allowed substitution hints:   A( x, y, z, w, f)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3.1	. . 3 |- A = { f | E. x e. On ( f Fn x /\ A. y e. x ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) ) }
2		vex 2766	. . 3 |- g e. _V
3	1, 2	tfrlem3a 6368	. 2 |- ( g e. A <-> E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) )
4	3	abbi2i 2311	1 |- A = { g | E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1364   {cab 2182   A.wral 2475   E.wrex 2476   Oncon0 4398   |` cres 4665   Fn wfn 5253   ` cfv 5258

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-ext 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-ral 2480  df-rex 2481  df-v 2765  df-un 3161  df-in 3163  df-ss 3170  df-sn 3628  df-pr 3629  df-op 3631  df-uni 3840  df-br 4034  df-opab 4095  df-xp 4669  df-rel 4670  df-cnv 4671  df-co 4672  df-dm 4673  df-res 4675  df-iota 5219  df-fun 5260  df-fn 5261  df-fv 5266

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem4  6371  tfrlem8  6376  tfrlemi1  6390  tfrexlem  6392  tfri1d  6393  tfrex  6426