Theorem tfrlem3-2d 6202

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion which changes a bound variable (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3-2d.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3-2d	⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ V))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑔,𝐹

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑔)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3-2d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3-2d.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V))
2		fveq2 5414	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑔 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑔))
3	2	eleq1d 2206	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑔 → ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ V))
4	3	anbi2d 459	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑔 → ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V) ↔ (Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ V)))
5	4	cbvalv 1889	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V) ↔ ∀𝑔(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ V))
6	1, 5	sylib 121	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑔(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ V))
7	6	19.21bi 1537	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ V))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103  ∀wal 1329   ∈ wcel 1480  Vcvv 2681  Fun wfun 5112  ‘cfv 5118

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-rex 2420  df-v 2683  df-un 3070  df-sn 3528  df-pr 3529  df-op 3531  df-uni 3732  df-br 3925  df-iota 5083  df-fv 5126

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlemisucfn  6214  tfrlemisucaccv  6215  tfrlemibxssdm  6217  tfrlemibfn  6218  tfrlemi14d  6223