Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > tfrlem3-2d | GIF version |
Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion which changes a bound variable (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2019.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
tfrlem3-2d.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
tfrlem3-2d | ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ V)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | tfrlem3-2d.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V)) | |
2 | fveq2 5496 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑔 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑔)) | |
3 | 2 | eleq1d 2239 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑔 → ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ V)) |
4 | 3 | anbi2d 461 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑔 → ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V) ↔ (Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ V))) |
5 | 4 | cbvalv 1910 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V) ↔ ∀𝑔(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ V)) |
6 | 1, 5 | sylib 121 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑔(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ V)) |
7 | 6 | 19.21bi 1551 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ V)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ∀wal 1346 ∈ wcel 2141 Vcvv 2730 Fun wfun 5192 ‘cfv 5198 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 704 ax-5 1440 ax-7 1441 ax-gen 1442 ax-ie1 1486 ax-ie2 1487 ax-8 1497 ax-10 1498 ax-11 1499 ax-i12 1500 ax-bndl 1502 ax-4 1503 ax-17 1519 ax-i9 1523 ax-ial 1527 ax-i5r 1528 ax-ext 2152 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 975 df-tru 1351 df-nf 1454 df-sb 1756 df-clab 2157 df-cleq 2163 df-clel 2166 df-nfc 2301 df-rex 2454 df-v 2732 df-un 3125 df-sn 3589 df-pr 3590 df-op 3592 df-uni 3797 df-br 3990 df-iota 5160 df-fv 5206 |
This theorem is referenced by: tfrlemisucfn 6303 tfrlemisucaccv 6304 tfrlemibxssdm 6306 tfrlemibfn 6307 tfrlemi14d 6312 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |