P. 64 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6301-6400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	caofinvl 6301*	Transfer a left inverse law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ph -> N : S --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> G = ( v e. A |-> ( N ` ( F ` v ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. S ) -> ( ( N ` x ) R x ) = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( G oF R F ) = ( A X. { B } ) )
Theorem	caofid0l 6302*	Transfer a left identity law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. S ) -> ( B R x ) = x )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A X. { B } ) oF R F ) = F )
Theorem	caofid0r 6303*	Transfer a right identity law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. S ) -> ( x R B ) = x )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oF R ( A X. { B } ) ) = F )
Theorem	caofid1 6304*	Transfer a right absorption law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. X )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. S ) -> ( x R B ) = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oF R ( A X. { B } ) ) = ( A X. { C } ) )
Theorem	caofid2 6305*	Transfer a right absorption law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. X )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. S ) -> ( B R x ) = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A X. { B } ) oF R F ) = ( A X. { C } ) )
Theorem	caofcom 6306*	Transfer a commutative law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> G : A --> S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x R y ) = ( y R x ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oF R G ) = ( G oF R F ) )
Theorem	caofrss 6307*	Transfer a relation subset law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> G : A --> S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x R y -> x T y ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oR R G -> F oR T G ) )
Theorem	caoftrn 6308*	Transfer a transitivity law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> G : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> H : A --> S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( ( x R y /\ y T z ) -> x U z ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( F oR R G /\ G oR T H ) -> F oR U H ) )
Theorem	caofdig 6309*	Transfer a distributive law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> K )   &    |- ( ph -> G : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> H : A --> S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x R y ) e. V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. K /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x T y ) e. W )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. K /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( x T ( y R z ) ) = ( ( x T y ) O ( x T z ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oF T ( G oF R H ) ) = ( ( F oF T G ) oF O ( F oF T H ) ) )
2.6.14  Functions (continued)
Theorem	resfunexgALT 6310	The restriction of a function to a set exists. Compare Proposition 6.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 28. This version has a shorter proof than resfunexg 5910 but requires ax-pow 4292 and ax-un 4559. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1995.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( Fun A /\ B e. C ) -> ( A |` B ) e. _V )
Theorem	cofunexg 6311	Existence of a composition when the first member is a function. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
|- ( ( Fun A /\ B e. C ) -> ( A o. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	cofunex2g 6312	Existence of a composition when the second member is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ Fun `' B ) -> ( A o. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	fnexALT 6313	If the domain of a function is a set, the function is a set. Theorem 6.16(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 28. This theorem is derived using the Axiom of Replacement in the form of funimaexg 5445. This version of fnex 5911 uses ax-pow 4292 and ax-un 4559, whereas fnex 5911 does not. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( F Fn A /\ A e. B ) -> F e. _V )
Theorem	funexw 6314	Weak version of funex 5914 that holds without ax-coll 4230. If the domain and codomain of a function exist, so does the function. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
|- ( ( Fun F /\ dom F e. B /\ ran F e. C ) -> F e. _V )
Theorem	mptexw 6315*	Weak version of mptex 5917 that holds without ax-coll 4230. If the domain and codomain of a function given by maps-to notation are sets, the function is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- A. x e. A B e. C   =>    |- ( x e. A |-> B ) e. _V
Theorem	funrnex 6316	If the domain of a function exists, so does its range. Part of Theorem 4.15(v) of [Monk1] p. 46. This theorem is derived using the Axiom of Replacement in the form of funex 5914. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.)
|- ( dom F e. B -> ( Fun F -> ran F e. _V ) )
Theorem	focdmex 6317	If the domain of an onto function exists, so does its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.)
|- ( A e. C -> ( F : A -onto-> B -> B e. _V ) )
Theorem	f1dmex 6318	If the codomain of a one-to-one function exists, so does its domain. This can be thought of as a form of the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
|- ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ B e. C ) -> A e. _V )
Theorem	abrexex 6319*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. x is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for B, which can be thought of as B ( x ). This simple-looking theorem is actually quite powerful and appears to involve the Axiom of Replacement in an intrinsic way, as can be seen by tracing back through the path mptexg 5916, funex 5914, fnex 5911, resfunexg 5910, and funimaexg 5445. See also abrexex2 6326. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x e. A y = B } e. _V
Theorem	abrexexg 6320*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. x is normally a free-variable parameter in B. The antecedent assures us that A is a set. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.)
|- ( A e. V -> { y | E. x e. A y = B } e. _V )
Theorem	iunexg 6321*	The existence of an indexed union. x is normally a free-variable parameter in B. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ A. x e. A B e. W ) -> U_ x e. A B e. _V )
Theorem	abrexex2g 6322*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ A. x e. A { y | ph } e. W ) -> { y | E. x e. A ph } e. _V )
Theorem	opabex3d 6323*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Oct-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> { y | ps } e. _V )   =>    |- ( ph -> { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ps ) } e. _V )
Theorem	opabex3 6324*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x e. A -> { y | ph } e. _V )   =>    |- { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } e. _V
Theorem	iunex 6325*	The existence of an indexed union. x is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for B, which can be read informally as B ( x ). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- U_ x e. A B e. _V
Theorem	abrexex2 6326*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. ph is normally has free-variable parameters x and y. See also abrexex 6319. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x e. A ph } e. _V
Theorem	abexssex 6327*	Existence of a class abstraction with an existentially quantified expression. Both x and y can be free in ph. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2006.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x ( x C_ A /\ ph ) } e. _V
Theorem	abexex 6328*	A condition where a class builder continues to exist after its wff is existentially quantified. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2007.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( ph -> x e. A )   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x ph } e. _V
Theorem	elabreximd 6329*	Class substitution in an image set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Dec-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- F/ x ch   &    |- ( A = B -> ( ch <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. C ) -> ps )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ A e. { y | E. x e. C y = B } ) -> ch )
Theorem	elabreximdv 6330*	Class substitution in an image set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Dec-2016.)
|- ( A = B -> ( ch <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. C ) -> ps )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ A e. { y | E. x e. C y = B } ) -> ch )
Theorem	abrexss 6331*	A necessary condition for an image set to be a subset. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Feb-2017.)
|- F/_ x C   =>    |- ( A. x e. A B e. C -> { y | E. x e. A y = B } C_ C )
Theorem	funimass4f 6332	Membership relation for the values of a function whose image is a subclass. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Apr-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   &    |- F/_ x F   =>    |- ( ( Fun F /\ A C_ dom F ) -> ( ( F " A ) C_ B <-> A. x e. A ( F ` x ) e. B ) )
Theorem	oprabexd 6333*	Existence of an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> E* z ps )   &    |- ( ph -> F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) } )   =>    |- ( ph -> F e. _V )
Theorem	oprabex 6334*	Existence of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> E* z ph )   &    |- F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) }   =>    |- F e. _V
Theorem	oprabex3 6335*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- H e. _V   &    |- F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. ( H X. H ) /\ y e. ( H X. H ) ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x = <. w , v >. /\ y = <. u , f >. ) /\ z = R ) ) }   =>    |- F e. _V
Theorem	oprabrexex2 6336*	Existence of an existentially restricted operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | E. w e. A ph } e. _V
Theorem	ab2rexex 6337*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. Variables x and y are normally free-variable parameters in the class expression substituted for C, which can be thought of as C ( x , y ). See comments for abrexex 6319. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- { z | E. x e. A E. y e. B z = C } e. _V
Theorem	ab2rexex2 6338*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. ph normally has free-variable parameters x, y, and z. Compare abrexex2 6326. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- { z | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { z | E. x e. A E. y e. B ph } e. _V
Theorem	xpexgALT 6339	The cross product of two sets is a set. Proposition 6.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. This version is proven using Replacement; see xpexg 4869 for a version that uses the Power Set axiom instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A X. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	offval3 6340*	General value of ( F oF R G ) with no assumptions on functionality of F and G. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ G e. W ) -> ( F oF R G ) = ( x e. ( dom F i^i dom G ) |-> ( ( F ` x ) R ( G ` x ) ) ) )
Theorem	offres 6341	Pointwise combination commutes with restriction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ G e. W ) -> ( ( F oF R G ) |` D ) = ( ( F |` D ) oF R ( G |` D ) ) )
Theorem	ofmres 6342*	Equivalent expressions for a restriction of the function operation map. Unlike oF R which is a proper class, ( oF R |` ( A X. B ) ) can be a set by ofmresex 6343, allowing it to be used as a function or structure argument. By ofmresval 6287, the restricted operation map values are the same as the original values, allowing theorems for oF R to be reused. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
|- ( oF R |` ( A X. B ) ) = ( f e. A , g e. B |-> ( f oF R g ) )
Theorem	ofmresex 6343	Existence of a restriction of the function operation map. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( oF R |` ( A X. B ) ) e. _V )
Theorem	uchoice 6344*	Principle of unique choice. This is also called non-choice. The name choice results in its similarity to something like acfun 7527 (with the key difference being the change of E. to E!) but unique choice in fact follows from the axiom of collection and our other axioms. This is somewhat similar to Corollary 3.9.2 of [HoTT], p. (varies) but is better described by the paragraph at the end of Section 3.9 which starts "A similar issue arises in set-theoretic mathematics". (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2025.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ A. x e. A E! y ph ) -> E. f ( f Fn A /\ A. x e. A [. ( f ` x ) / y ]. ph ) )
2.6.15  First and second members of an ordered pair
Syntax	c1st 6345	Extend the definition of a class to include the first member an ordered pair function.
class 1st
Syntax	c2nd 6346	Extend the definition of a class to include the second member an ordered pair function.
class 2nd
Definition	df-1st 6347	Define a function that extracts the first member, or abscissa, of an ordered pair. Theorem op1st 6353 proves that it does this. For example, ( 1st ` <. 3 , 4 >.) = 3 . Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52 (compare op1sta 5249 and op1stb 4604). The notation is the same as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|- 1st = ( x e. _V |-> U. dom { x } )
Definition	df-2nd 6348	Define a function that extracts the second member, or ordinate, of an ordered pair. Theorem op2nd 6354 proves that it does this. For example, ( 2nd ` <. 3 , 4 >.) = 4 . Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52 (compare op2nda 5252 and op2ndb 5251). The notation is the same as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|- 2nd = ( x e. _V |-> U. ran { x } )
Theorem	1stvalg 6349	The value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( A e. _V -> ( 1st ` A ) = U. dom { A } )
Theorem	2ndvalg 6350	The value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( A e. _V -> ( 2nd ` A ) = U. ran { A } )
Theorem	1st0 6351	The value of the first-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
|- ( 1st ` (/) ) = (/)
Theorem	2nd0 6352	The value of the second-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
|- ( 2nd ` (/) ) = (/)
Theorem	op1st 6353	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( 1st ` <. A , B >. ) = A
Theorem	op2nd 6354	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( 2nd ` <. A , B >. ) = B
Theorem	op1std 6355	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( C = <. A , B >. -> ( 1st ` C ) = A )
Theorem	op2ndd 6356	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( C = <. A , B >. -> ( 2nd ` C ) = B )
Theorem	op1stg 6357	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( 1st ` <. A , B >. ) = A )
Theorem	op2ndg 6358	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( 2nd ` <. A , B >. ) = B )
Theorem	ot1stg 6359	Extract the first member of an ordered triple. (Due to infrequent usage, it isn't worthwhile at this point to define special extractors for triples, so we reuse the ordered pair extractors for ot1stg 6359, ot2ndg 6360, ot3rdgg 6361.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( 1st ` ( 1st ` <. A , B , C >. ) ) = A )
Theorem	ot2ndg 6360	Extract the second member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 6359 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( 2nd ` ( 1st ` <. A , B , C >. ) ) = B )
Theorem	ot3rdgg 6361	Extract the third member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 6359 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( 2nd ` <. A , B , C >. ) = C )
Theorem	1stval2 6362	Alternate value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) -> ( 1st ` A ) = |^| |^| A )
Theorem	2ndval2 6363	Alternate value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) -> ( 2nd ` A ) = |^| |^| |^| `' { A } )
Theorem	fo1st 6364	The 1st function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- 1st : _V -onto-> _V
Theorem	fo2nd 6365	The 2nd function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- 2nd : _V -onto-> _V
Theorem	f1stres 6366	Mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( 1st |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) --> A
Theorem	f2ndres 6367	Mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( 2nd |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) --> B
Theorem	fo1stresm 6368*	Onto mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2019.)
|- ( E. y y e. B -> ( 1st |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) -onto-> A )
Theorem	fo2ndresm 6369*	Onto mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2019.)
|- ( E. x x e. A -> ( 2nd |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) -onto-> B )
Theorem	1stcof 6370	Composition of the first member function with another function. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2007.)
|- ( F : A --> ( B X. C ) -> ( 1st o. F ) : A --> B )
Theorem	2ndcof 6371	Composition of the second member function with another function. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.)
|- ( F : A --> ( B X. C ) -> ( 2nd o. F ) : A --> C )
Theorem	xp1st 6372	Location of the first element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> ( 1st ` A ) e. B )
Theorem	xp2nd 6373	Location of the second element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> ( 2nd ` A ) e. C )
Theorem	1stexg 6374	Existence of the first member of a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2019.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( 1st ` A ) e. _V )
Theorem	2ndexg 6375	Existence of the first member of a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2019.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( 2nd ` A ) e. _V )
Theorem	elxp6 6376	Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 5255. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) )
Theorem	elxp7 6377	Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 5255. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) )
Theorem	oprssdmm 6378*	Domain of closure of an operation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Oct-2023.)
|- ( ( ph /\ u e. S ) -> E. v v e. u )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x F y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> Rel F )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( S X. S ) C_ dom F )
Theorem	eqopi 6379	Equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. ( V X. W ) /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) = B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = C ) ) -> A = <. B , C >. )
Theorem	xp2 6380*	Representation of cross product based on ordered pair component functions. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
|- ( A X. B ) = { x e. ( _V X. _V ) | ( ( 1st ` x ) e. A /\ ( 2nd ` x ) e. B ) }
Theorem	unielxp 6381	The membership relation for a cross product is inherited by union. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> U. A e. U. ( B X. C ) )
Theorem	1st2nd2 6382	Reconstruction of a member of a cross product in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2013.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. )
Theorem	xpopth 6383	An ordered pair theorem for members of cross products. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2007.)
|- ( ( A e. ( C X. D ) /\ B e. ( R X. S ) ) -> ( ( ( 1st ` A ) = ( 1st ` B ) /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = ( 2nd ` B ) ) <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	eqop 6384	Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. ( V X. W ) -> ( A = <. B , C >. <-> ( ( 1st ` A ) = B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = C ) ) )
Theorem	eqop2 6385	Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- ( A = <. B , C >. <-> ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) = B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = C ) ) )
Theorem	op1steq 6386*	Two ways of expressing that an element is the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.)
|- ( A e. ( V X. W ) -> ( ( 1st ` A ) = B <-> E. x A = <. B , x >. ) )
Theorem	2nd1st 6387	Swap the members of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2014.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> U. `' { A } = <. ( 2nd ` A ) , ( 1st ` A ) >. )
Theorem	1st2nd 6388	Reconstruction of a member of a relation in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
|- ( ( Rel B /\ A e. B ) -> A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. )
Theorem	1stdm 6389	The first ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the domain of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A e. R ) -> ( 1st ` A ) e. dom R )
Theorem	2ndrn 6390	The second ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the range of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A e. R ) -> ( 2nd ` A ) e. ran R )
Theorem	1st2ndbr 6391	Express an element of a relation as a relationship between first and second components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.)
|- ( ( Rel B /\ A e. B ) -> ( 1st ` A ) B ( 2nd ` A ) )
Theorem	releldm2 6392*	Two ways of expressing membership in the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
|- ( Rel A -> ( B e. dom A <-> E. x e. A ( 1st ` x ) = B ) )
Theorem	reldm 6393*	An expression for the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
|- ( Rel A -> dom A = ran ( x e. A |-> ( 1st ` x ) ) )
Theorem	sbcopeq1a 6394	Equality theorem for substitution of a class for an ordered pair (analog of sbceq1a 3055 that avoids the existential quantifiers of copsexg 4365). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( A = <. x , y >. -> ( [. ( 1st ` A ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` A ) / y ]. ph <-> ph ) )
Theorem	csbopeq1a 6395	Equality theorem for substitution of a class A for an ordered pair <. x , y >. in B (analog of csbeq1a 3150). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( A = <. x , y >. -> [_ ( 1st ` A ) / x ]_ [_ ( 2nd ` A ) / y ]_ B = B )
Theorem	dfopab2 6396*	A way to define an ordered-pair class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- { <. x , y >. | ph } = { z e. ( _V X. _V ) | [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph }
Theorem	dfoprab3s 6397*	A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) }
Theorem	dfoprab3 6398*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.)
|- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps }
Theorem	dfoprab4 6399*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) }
Theorem	dfoprab4f 6400*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) }