HomeHome Intuitionistic Logic Explorer
Theorem List (p. 64 of 116)
< Previous  Next >
Browser slow? Try the
Unicode version.

Mirrors  >  Metamath Home Page  >  ILE Home Page  >  Theorem List Contents  >  Recent Proofs       This page: Page List

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6301-6400   *Has distinct variable group(s)
TypeLabelDescription
Statement
 
Theoremswoord1 6301* The incomparability equivalence relation is compatible with the original order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2014.)
 |-  R  =  ( ( X  X.  X ) 
 \  (  .<  u.  `'  .<  ) )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\  ( y  e.  X  /\  z  e.  X ) )  ->  ( y 
 .<  z  ->  -.  z  .<  y ) )   &    |-  (
 ( ph  /\  ( x  e.  X  /\  y  e.  X  /\  z  e.  X ) )  ->  ( x  .<  y  ->  ( x  .<  z  \/  z  .<  y )
 ) )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  C  e.  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  A R B )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( A  .<  C  <->  B  .<  C ) )
 
Theoremswoord2 6302* The incomparability equivalence relation is compatible with the original order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2014.)
 |-  R  =  ( ( X  X.  X ) 
 \  (  .<  u.  `'  .<  ) )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\  ( y  e.  X  /\  z  e.  X ) )  ->  ( y 
 .<  z  ->  -.  z  .<  y ) )   &    |-  (
 ( ph  /\  ( x  e.  X  /\  y  e.  X  /\  z  e.  X ) )  ->  ( x  .<  y  ->  ( x  .<  z  \/  z  .<  y )
 ) )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  C  e.  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  A R B )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( C  .<  A  <->  C  .<  B ) )
 
Theoremeqerlem 6303* Lemma for eqer 6304. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 6-Dec-2016.)
 |-  ( x  =  y 
 ->  A  =  B )   &    |-  R  =  { <. x ,  y >.  |  A  =  B }   =>    |-  ( z R w  <->  [_ z  /  x ]_ A  =  [_ w  /  x ]_ A )
 
Theoremeqer 6304* Equivalence relation involving equality of dependent classes  A
( x ) and  B ( y ). (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
 |-  ( x  =  y 
 ->  A  =  B )   &    |-  R  =  { <. x ,  y >.  |  A  =  B }   =>    |-  R  Er  _V
 
Theoremider 6305 The identity relation is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
 |- 
 _I  Er  _V
 
Theorem0er 6306 The empty set is an equivalence relation on the empty set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2015.)
 |-  (/)  Er  (/)
 
Theoremeceq1 6307 Equality theorem for equivalence class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
 |-  ( A  =  B  ->  [ A ] C  =  [ B ] C )
 
Theoremeceq1d 6308 Equality theorem for equivalence class (deduction form). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2019.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  A  =  B )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  [ A ] C  =  [ B ] C )
 
Theoremeceq2 6309 Equality theorem for equivalence class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
 |-  ( A  =  B  ->  [ C ] A  =  [ C ] B )
 
Theoremelecg 6310 Membership in an equivalence class. Theorem 72 of [Suppes] p. 82. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
 |-  ( ( A  e.  V  /\  B  e.  W )  ->  ( A  e.  [ B ] R  <->  B R A ) )
 
Theoremelec 6311 Membership in an equivalence class. Theorem 72 of [Suppes] p. 82. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   &    |-  B  e.  _V   =>    |-  ( A  e.  [ B ] R  <->  B R A )
 
Theoremrelelec 6312 Membership in an equivalence class when  R is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
 |-  ( Rel  R  ->  ( A  e.  [ B ] R  <->  B R A ) )
 
Theoremecss 6313 An equivalence class is a subset of the domain. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  X )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  [ A ] R  C_  X )
 
Theoremecdmn0m 6314* A representative of an inhabited equivalence class belongs to the domain of the equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Aug-2019.)
 |-  ( A  e.  dom  R  <->  E. x  x  e.  [ A ] R )
 
Theoremereldm 6315 Equality of equivalence classes implies equivalence of domain membership. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  [ A ] R  =  [ B ] R )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( A  e.  X  <->  B  e.  X ) )
 
Theoremerth 6316 Basic property of equivalence relations. Theorem 73 of [Suppes] p. 82. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  X )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( A R B  <->  [ A ] R  =  [ B ] R ) )
 
Theoremerth2 6317 Basic property of equivalence relations. Compare Theorem 73 of [Suppes] p. 82. Assumes membership of the second argument in the domain. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  X )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( A R B  <->  [ A ] R  =  [ B ] R ) )
 
Theoremerthi 6318 Basic property of equivalence relations. Part of Lemma 3N of [Enderton] p. 57. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  A R B )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  [ A ] R  =  [ B ] R )
 
Theoremecidsn 6319 An equivalence class modulo the identity relation is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-2004.)
 |- 
 [ A ]  _I  =  { A }
 
Theoremqseq1 6320 Equality theorem for quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
 |-  ( A  =  B  ->  ( A /. C )  =  ( B /. C ) )
 
Theoremqseq2 6321 Equality theorem for quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
 |-  ( A  =  B  ->  ( C /. A )  =  ( C /. B ) )
 
Theoremelqsg 6322* Closed form of elqs 6323. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 12-Oct-2010.)
 |-  ( B  e.  V  ->  ( B  e.  ( A /. R )  <->  E. x  e.  A  B  =  [ x ] R ) )
 
Theoremelqs 6323* Membership in a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
 |-  B  e.  _V   =>    |-  ( B  e.  ( A /. R )  <->  E. x  e.  A  B  =  [ x ] R )
 
Theoremelqsi 6324* Membership in a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
 |-  ( B  e.  ( A /. R )  ->  E. x  e.  A  B  =  [ x ] R )
 
Theoremecelqsg 6325 Membership of an equivalence class in a quotient set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
 |-  ( ( R  e.  V  /\  B  e.  A )  ->  [ B ] R  e.  ( A /. R ) )
 
Theoremecelqsi 6326 Membership of an equivalence class in a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
 |-  R  e.  _V   =>    |-  ( B  e.  A  ->  [ B ] R  e.  ( A /. R ) )
 
Theoremecopqsi 6327 "Closure" law for equivalence class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1996.)
 |-  R  e.  _V   &    |-  S  =  ( ( A  X.  A ) /. R )   =>    |-  ( ( B  e.  A  /\  C  e.  A )  ->  [ <. B ,  C >. ] R  e.  S )
 
Theoremqsexg 6328 A quotient set exists. (Contributed by FL, 19-May-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
 |-  ( A  e.  V  ->  ( A /. R )  e.  _V )
 
Theoremqsex 6329 A quotient set exists. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1995.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   =>    |-  ( A /. R )  e.  _V
 
Theoremuniqs 6330 The union of a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Dec-2008.)
 |-  ( R  e.  V  ->  U. ( A /. R )  =  ( R " A ) )
 
Theoremqsss 6331 A quotient set is a set of subsets of the base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  A )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( A /. R )  C_  ~P A )
 
Theoremuniqs2 6332 The union of a quotient set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  A )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  R  e.  V )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  U. ( A /. R )  =  A )
 
Theoremsnec 6333 The singleton of an equivalence class. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   =>    |-  { [ A ] R }  =  ( { A } /. R )
 
Theoremecqs 6334 Equivalence class in terms of quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1999.)
 |-  R  e.  _V   =>    |-  [ A ] R  =  U. ( { A } /. R )
 
Theoremecid 6335 A set is equal to its converse epsilon coset. (Note: converse epsilon is not an equivalence relation.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   =>    |-  [ A ] `'  _E  =  A
 
Theoremecidg 6336 A set is equal to its converse epsilon coset. (Note: converse epsilon is not an equivalence relation.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jan-2020.)
 |-  ( A  e.  V  ->  [ A ] `'  _E  =  A )
 
Theoremqsid 6337 A set is equal to its quotient set mod converse epsilon. (Note: converse epsilon is not an equivalence relation.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
 |-  ( A /. `'  _E  )  =  A
 
Theoremectocld 6338* Implicit substitution of class for equivalence class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
 |-  S  =  ( B
 /. R )   &    |-  ( [ x ] R  =  A  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) )   &    |-  (
 ( ch  /\  x  e.  B )  ->  ph )   =>    |-  (
 ( ch  /\  A  e.  S )  ->  ps )
 
Theoremectocl 6339* Implicit substitution of class for equivalence class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
 |-  S  =  ( B
 /. R )   &    |-  ( [ x ] R  =  A  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) )   &    |-  ( x  e.  B  ->  ph )   =>    |-  ( A  e.  S  ->  ps )
 
Theoremelqsn0m 6340* An element of a quotient set is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Aug-2019.)
 |-  ( ( dom  R  =  A  /\  B  e.  ( A /. R ) )  ->  E. x  x  e.  B )
 
Theoremelqsn0 6341 A quotient set doesn't contain the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.)
 |-  ( ( dom  R  =  A  /\  B  e.  ( A /. R ) )  ->  B  =/=  (/) )
 
Theoremecelqsdm 6342 Membership of an equivalence class in a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1995.)
 |-  ( ( dom  R  =  A  /\  [ B ] R  e.  ( A /. R ) ) 
 ->  B  e.  A )
 
Theoremxpiderm 6343* A square Cartesian product is an equivalence relation (in general it's not a poset). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Aug-2019.)
 |-  ( E. x  x  e.  A  ->  ( A  X.  A )  Er  A )
 
Theoremiinerm 6344* The intersection of a nonempty family of equivalence relations is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.)
 |-  ( ( E. y  y  e.  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  R  Er  B )  ->  |^|_ x  e.  A  R  Er  B )
 
Theoremriinerm 6345* The relative intersection of a family of equivalence relations is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.)
 |-  ( ( E. y  y  e.  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  R  Er  B )  ->  (
 ( B  X.  B )  i^i  |^|_ x  e.  A  R )  Er  B )
 
Theoremerinxp 6346 A restricted equivalence relation is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  A )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  B 
 C_  A )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( R  i^i  ( B  X.  B ) )  Er  B )
 
Theoremecinxp 6347 Restrict the relation in an equivalence class to a base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2015.)
 |-  ( ( ( R
 " A )  C_  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->  [ B ] R  =  [ B ] ( R  i^i  ( A  X.  A ) ) )
 
Theoremqsinxp 6348 Restrict the equivalence relation in a quotient set to the base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2015.)
 |-  ( ( R " A )  C_  A  ->  ( A /. R )  =  ( A /. ( R  i^i  ( A  X.  A ) ) ) )
 
Theoremqsel 6349 If an element of a quotient set contains a given element, it is equal to the equivalence class of the element. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
 |-  ( ( R  Er  X  /\  B  e.  ( A /. R )  /\  C  e.  B )  ->  B  =  [ C ] R )
 
Theoremqliftlem 6350*  F, a function lift, is a subset of  R  X.  S. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
 |-  F  =  ran  ( x  e.  X  |->  <. [ x ] R ,  A >. )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\  x  e.  X )  ->  A  e.  Y )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  X  e.  _V )   =>    |-  ( ( ph  /\  x  e.  X )  ->  [ x ] R  e.  ( X /. R ) )
 
Theoremqliftrel 6351*  F, a function lift, is a subset of  R  X.  S. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
 |-  F  =  ran  ( x  e.  X  |->  <. [ x ] R ,  A >. )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\  x  e.  X )  ->  A  e.  Y )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  X  e.  _V )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  F  C_  ( ( X /. R )  X.  Y ) )
 
Theoremqliftel 6352* Elementhood in the relation  F. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
 |-  F  =  ran  ( x  e.  X  |->  <. [ x ] R ,  A >. )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\  x  e.  X )  ->  A  e.  Y )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  X  e.  _V )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( [ C ] R F D 
 <-> 
 E. x  e.  X  ( C R x  /\  D  =  A )
 ) )
 
Theoremqliftel1 6353* Elementhood in the relation  F. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
 |-  F  =  ran  ( x  e.  X  |->  <. [ x ] R ,  A >. )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\  x  e.  X )  ->  A  e.  Y )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  X  e.  _V )   =>    |-  ( ( ph  /\  x  e.  X )  ->  [ x ] R F A )
 
Theoremqliftfun 6354* The function  F is the unique function defined by  F `  [
x ]  =  A, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
 |-  F  =  ran  ( x  e.  X  |->  <. [ x ] R ,  A >. )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\  x  e.  X )  ->  A  e.  Y )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  X  e.  _V )   &    |-  ( x  =  y 
 ->  A  =  B )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( Fun  F  <->  A. x A. y ( x R y  ->  A  =  B )
 ) )
 
Theoremqliftfund 6355* The function  F is the unique function defined by  F `  [
x ]  =  A, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
 |-  F  =  ran  ( x  e.  X  |->  <. [ x ] R ,  A >. )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\  x  e.  X )  ->  A  e.  Y )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  X  e.  _V )   &    |-  ( x  =  y 
 ->  A  =  B )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\  x R y )  ->  A  =  B )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  Fun  F )
 
Theoremqliftfuns 6356* The function  F is the unique function defined by  F `  [
x ]  =  A, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
 |-  F  =  ran  ( x  e.  X  |->  <. [ x ] R ,  A >. )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\  x  e.  X )  ->  A  e.  Y )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  X  e.  _V )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( Fun  F  <->  A. y A. z
 ( y R z 
 ->  [_ y  /  x ]_ A  =  [_ z  /  x ]_ A ) ) )
 
Theoremqliftf 6357* The domain and range of the function  F. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
 |-  F  =  ran  ( x  e.  X  |->  <. [ x ] R ,  A >. )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\  x  e.  X )  ->  A  e.  Y )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  X  e.  _V )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( Fun  F  <->  F : ( X
 /. R ) --> Y ) )
 
Theoremqliftval 6358* The value of the function  F. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
 |-  F  =  ran  ( x  e.  X  |->  <. [ x ] R ,  A >. )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\  x  e.  X )  ->  A  e.  Y )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  X  e.  _V )   &    |-  ( x  =  C  ->  A  =  B )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  Fun  F )   =>    |-  ( ( ph  /\  C  e.  X )  ->  ( F `  [ C ] R )  =  B )
 
Theoremecoptocl 6359* Implicit substitution of class for equivalence class of ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
 |-  S  =  ( ( B  X.  C )
 /. R )   &    |-  ( [ <. x ,  y >. ] R  =  A  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) )   &    |-  (
 ( x  e.  B  /\  y  e.  C )  ->  ph )   =>    |-  ( A  e.  S  ->  ps )
 
Theorem2ecoptocl 6360* Implicit substitution of classes for equivalence classes of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
 |-  S  =  ( ( C  X.  D )
 /. R )   &    |-  ( [ <. x ,  y >. ] R  =  A  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) )   &    |-  ( [ <. z ,  w >. ] R  =  B  ->  ( ps  <->  ch ) )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  /\  (
 z  e.  C  /\  w  e.  D )
 )  ->  ph )   =>    |-  ( ( A  e.  S  /\  B  e.  S )  ->  ch )
 
Theorem3ecoptocl 6361* Implicit substitution of classes for equivalence classes of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
 |-  S  =  ( ( D  X.  D )
 /. R )   &    |-  ( [ <. x ,  y >. ] R  =  A  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) )   &    |-  ( [ <. z ,  w >. ] R  =  B  ->  ( ps  <->  ch ) )   &    |-  ( [ <. v ,  u >. ] R  =  C  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  D  /\  y  e.  D )  /\  (
 z  e.  D  /\  w  e.  D )  /\  ( v  e.  D  /\  u  e.  D ) )  ->  ph )   =>    |-  (
 ( A  e.  S  /\  B  e.  S  /\  C  e.  S )  ->  th )
 
Theorembrecop 6362* Binary relation on a quotient set. Lemma for real number construction. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1996.)
 |- 
 .~  e.  _V   &    |-  .~  Er  ( G  X.  G )   &    |-  H  =  ( ( G  X.  G ) /.  .~  )   &    |- 
 .<_  =  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ( ( x  e.  H  /\  y  e.  H )  /\  E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x  =  [ <. z ,  w >. ] 
 .~  /\  y  =  [ <. v ,  u >. ]  .~  )  /\  ph ) ) }   &    |-  (
 ( ( ( z  e.  G  /\  w  e.  G )  /\  ( A  e.  G  /\  B  e.  G )
 )  /\  ( (
 v  e.  G  /\  u  e.  G )  /\  ( C  e.  G  /\  D  e.  G ) ) )  ->  (
 ( [ <. z ,  w >. ]  .~  =  [ <. A ,  B >. ]  .~  /\  [ <. v ,  u >. ] 
 .~  =  [ <. C ,  D >. ]  .~  )  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ( ( A  e.  G  /\  B  e.  G )  /\  ( C  e.  G  /\  D  e.  G )
 )  ->  ( [ <. A ,  B >. ] 
 .~  .<_  [ <. C ,  D >. ]  .~  <->  ps ) )
 
Theoremeroveu 6363* Lemma for eroprf 6365. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
 |-  J  =  ( A
 /. R )   &    |-  K  =  ( B /. S )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  T  e.  Z )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  U )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  S  Er  V )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  T  Er  W )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  A 
 C_  U )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  B  C_  V )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  C  C_  W )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  .+ 
 : ( A  X.  B ) --> C )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\  (
 ( r  e.  A  /\  s  e.  A )  /\  ( t  e.  B  /\  u  e.  B ) ) ) 
 ->  ( ( r R s  /\  t S u )  ->  (
 r  .+  t ) T ( s  .+  u ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ( ph  /\  ( X  e.  J  /\  Y  e.  K )
 )  ->  E! z E. p  e.  A  E. q  e.  B  ( ( X  =  [ p ] R  /\  Y  =  [ q ] S )  /\  z  =  [ ( p  .+  q ) ] T ) )
 
Theoremerovlem 6364* Lemma for eroprf 6365. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
 |-  J  =  ( A
 /. R )   &    |-  K  =  ( B /. S )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  T  e.  Z )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  U )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  S  Er  V )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  T  Er  W )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  A 
 C_  U )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  B  C_  V )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  C  C_  W )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  .+ 
 : ( A  X.  B ) --> C )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\  (
 ( r  e.  A  /\  s  e.  A )  /\  ( t  e.  B  /\  u  e.  B ) ) ) 
 ->  ( ( r R s  /\  t S u )  ->  (
 r  .+  t ) T ( s  .+  u ) ) )   &    |-  .+^ 
 =  { <. <. x ,  y >. ,  z >.  | 
 E. p  e.  A  E. q  e.  B  ( ( x  =  [ p ] R  /\  y  =  [
 q ] S ) 
 /\  z  =  [
 ( p  .+  q
 ) ] T ) }   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  .+^  =  ( x  e.  J ,  y  e.  K  |->  ( iota
 z E. p  e.  A  E. q  e.  B  ( ( x  =  [ p ] R  /\  y  =  [
 q ] S ) 
 /\  z  =  [
 ( p  .+  q
 ) ] T ) ) ) )
 
Theoremeroprf 6365* Functionality of an operation defined on equivalence classes. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
 |-  J  =  ( A
 /. R )   &    |-  K  =  ( B /. S )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  T  e.  Z )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  R  Er  U )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  S  Er  V )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  T  Er  W )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  A 
 C_  U )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  B  C_  V )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  C  C_  W )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  .+ 
 : ( A  X.  B ) --> C )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\  (
 ( r  e.  A  /\  s  e.  A )  /\  ( t  e.  B  /\  u  e.  B ) ) ) 
 ->  ( ( r R s  /\  t S u )  ->  (
 r  .+  t ) T ( s  .+  u ) ) )   &    |-  .+^ 
 =  { <. <. x ,  y >. ,  z >.  | 
 E. p  e.  A  E. q  e.  B  ( ( x  =  [ p ] R  /\  y  =  [
 q ] S ) 
 /\  z  =  [
 ( p  .+  q
 ) ] T ) }   &    |-  ( ph  ->  R  e.  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  S  e.  Y )   &    |-  L  =  ( C
 /. T )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  .+^  : ( J  X.  K )
 --> L )
 
Theoremeroprf2 6366* Functionality of an operation defined on equivalence classes. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.)
 |-  J  =  ( A
 /.  .~  )   &    |-  .+^  =  { <.
 <. x ,  y >. ,  z >.  |  E. p  e.  A  E. q  e.  A  ( ( x  =  [ p ]  .~  /\  y  =  [
 q ]  .~  )  /\  z  =  [
 ( p  .+  q
 ) ]  .~  ) }   &    |-  ( ph  ->  .~  e.  X )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  .~ 
 Er  U )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  A  C_  U )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  .+  :
 ( A  X.  A )
 --> A )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\  ( ( r  e.  A  /\  s  e.  A )  /\  (
 t  e.  A  /\  u  e.  A )
 ) )  ->  (
 ( r  .~  s  /\  t  .~  u ) 
 ->  ( r  .+  t
 )  .~  ( s  .+  u ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  .+^  : ( J  X.  J ) --> J )
 
Theoremecopoveq 6367* This is the first of several theorems about equivalence relations of the kind used in construction of fractions and signed reals, involving operations on equivalent classes of ordered pairs. This theorem expresses the relation 
.~ (specified by the hypothesis) in terms of its operation  F. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1995.)
 |- 
 .~  =  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ( ( x  e.  ( S  X.  S )  /\  y  e.  ( S  X.  S ) )  /\  E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x  =  <. z ,  w >.  /\  y  = 
 <. v ,  u >. ) 
 /\  ( z  .+  u )  =  ( w  .+  v ) ) ) }   =>    |-  ( ( ( A  e.  S  /\  B  e.  S )  /\  ( C  e.  S  /\  D  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( <. A ,  B >.  .~  <. C ,  D >.  <->  ( A  .+  D )  =  ( B  .+  C ) ) )
 
Theoremecopovsym 6368* Assuming the operation  F is commutative, show that the relation  .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
 |- 
 .~  =  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ( ( x  e.  ( S  X.  S )  /\  y  e.  ( S  X.  S ) )  /\  E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x  =  <. z ,  w >.  /\  y  = 
 <. v ,  u >. ) 
 /\  ( z  .+  u )  =  ( w  .+  v ) ) ) }   &    |-  ( x  .+  y )  =  (
 y  .+  x )   =>    |-  ( A  .~  B  ->  B  .~  A )
 
Theoremecopovtrn 6369* Assuming that operation  F is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation  .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
 |- 
 .~  =  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ( ( x  e.  ( S  X.  S )  /\  y  e.  ( S  X.  S ) )  /\  E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x  =  <. z ,  w >.  /\  y  = 
 <. v ,  u >. ) 
 /\  ( z  .+  u )  =  ( w  .+  v ) ) ) }   &    |-  ( x  .+  y )  =  (
 y  .+  x )   &    |-  (
 ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  ->  ( x  .+  y )  e.  S )   &    |-  ( ( x  .+  y )  .+  z )  =  ( x  .+  ( y  .+  z ) )   &    |-  ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  ->  (
 ( x  .+  y
 )  =  ( x 
 .+  z )  ->  y  =  z )
 )   =>    |-  ( ( A  .~  B  /\  B  .~  C )  ->  A  .~  C )
 
Theoremecopover 6370* Assuming that operation  F is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation  .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
 |- 
 .~  =  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ( ( x  e.  ( S  X.  S )  /\  y  e.  ( S  X.  S ) )  /\  E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x  =  <. z ,  w >.  /\  y  = 
 <. v ,  u >. ) 
 /\  ( z  .+  u )  =  ( w  .+  v ) ) ) }   &    |-  ( x  .+  y )  =  (
 y  .+  x )   &    |-  (
 ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  ->  ( x  .+  y )  e.  S )   &    |-  ( ( x  .+  y )  .+  z )  =  ( x  .+  ( y  .+  z ) )   &    |-  ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  ->  (
 ( x  .+  y
 )  =  ( x 
 .+  z )  ->  y  =  z )
 )   =>    |- 
 .~  Er  ( S  X.  S )
 
Theoremecopovsymg 6371* Assuming the operation  F is commutative, show that the relation  .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is symmetric. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
 |- 
 .~  =  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ( ( x  e.  ( S  X.  S )  /\  y  e.  ( S  X.  S ) )  /\  E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x  =  <. z ,  w >.  /\  y  = 
 <. v ,  u >. ) 
 /\  ( z  .+  u )  =  ( w  .+  v ) ) ) }   &    |-  ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  ->  ( x  .+  y )  =  ( y  .+  x ) )   =>    |-  ( A  .~  B  ->  B  .~  A )
 
Theoremecopovtrng 6372* Assuming that operation  F is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation  .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is transitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
 |- 
 .~  =  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ( ( x  e.  ( S  X.  S )  /\  y  e.  ( S  X.  S ) )  /\  E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x  =  <. z ,  w >.  /\  y  = 
 <. v ,  u >. ) 
 /\  ( z  .+  u )  =  ( w  .+  v ) ) ) }   &    |-  ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  ->  ( x  .+  y )  =  ( y  .+  x ) )   &    |-  ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  ->  ( x  .+  y )  e.  S )   &    |-  ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S  /\  z  e.  S )  ->  (
 ( x  .+  y
 )  .+  z )  =  ( x  .+  (
 y  .+  z )
 ) )   &    |-  ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S  /\  z  e.  S )  ->  (
 ( x  .+  y
 )  =  ( x 
 .+  z )  ->  y  =  z )
 )   =>    |-  ( ( A  .~  B  /\  B  .~  C )  ->  A  .~  C )
 
Theoremecopoverg 6373* Assuming that operation  F is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation  .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
 |- 
 .~  =  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ( ( x  e.  ( S  X.  S )  /\  y  e.  ( S  X.  S ) )  /\  E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x  =  <. z ,  w >.  /\  y  = 
 <. v ,  u >. ) 
 /\  ( z  .+  u )  =  ( w  .+  v ) ) ) }   &    |-  ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  ->  ( x  .+  y )  =  ( y  .+  x ) )   &    |-  ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  ->  ( x  .+  y )  e.  S )   &    |-  ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S  /\  z  e.  S )  ->  (
 ( x  .+  y
 )  .+  z )  =  ( x  .+  (
 y  .+  z )
 ) )   &    |-  ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S  /\  z  e.  S )  ->  (
 ( x  .+  y
 )  =  ( x 
 .+  z )  ->  y  =  z )
 )   =>    |- 
 .~  Er  ( S  X.  S )
 
Theoremth3qlem1 6374* Lemma for Exercise 44 version of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60. The third hypothesis is the compatibility assumption. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
 |- 
 .~  Er  S   &    |-  ( ( ( y  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )  /\  ( z  e.  S  /\  v  e.  S ) )  ->  ( ( y  .~  w  /\  z  .~  v )  ->  ( y  .+  z ) 
 .~  ( w  .+  v ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ( A  e.  ( S /.  .~  )  /\  B  e.  ( S
 /.  .~  ) )  ->  E* x E. y E. z ( ( A  =  [ y ]  .~  /\  B  =  [
 z ]  .~  )  /\  x  =  [
 ( y  .+  z
 ) ]  .~  )
 )
 
Theoremth3qlem2 6375* Lemma for Exercise 44 version of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60, extended to operations on ordered pairs. The fourth hypothesis is the compatibility assumption. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
 |- 
 .~  e.  _V   &    |-  .~  Er  ( S  X.  S )   &    |-  (
 ( ( ( w  e.  S  /\  v  e.  S )  /\  ( u  e.  S  /\  t  e.  S )
 )  /\  ( (
 s  e.  S  /\  f  e.  S )  /\  ( g  e.  S  /\  h  e.  S ) ) )  ->  ( ( <. w ,  v >.  .~  <. u ,  t >.  /\  <. s ,  f >.  .~  <. g ,  h >. )  ->  ( <. w ,  v >.  .+ 
 <. s ,  f >. ) 
 .~  ( <. u ,  t >.  .+  <. g ,  h >. ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ( A  e.  ( ( S  X.  S ) /.  .~  )  /\  B  e.  (
 ( S  X.  S ) /.  .~  ) ) 
 ->  E* z E. w E. v E. u E. t ( ( A  =  [ <. w ,  v >. ]  .~  /\  B  =  [ <. u ,  t >. ]  .~  )  /\  z  =  [
 ( <. w ,  v >.  .+  <. u ,  t >. ) ]  .~  )
 )
 
Theoremth3qcor 6376* Corollary of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
 |- 
 .~  e.  _V   &    |-  .~  Er  ( S  X.  S )   &    |-  (
 ( ( ( w  e.  S  /\  v  e.  S )  /\  ( u  e.  S  /\  t  e.  S )
 )  /\  ( (
 s  e.  S  /\  f  e.  S )  /\  ( g  e.  S  /\  h  e.  S ) ) )  ->  ( ( <. w ,  v >.  .~  <. u ,  t >.  /\  <. s ,  f >.  .~  <. g ,  h >. )  ->  ( <. w ,  v >.  .+ 
 <. s ,  f >. ) 
 .~  ( <. u ,  t >.  .+  <. g ,  h >. ) ) )   &    |-  G  =  { <. <. x ,  y >. ,  z >.  |  ( ( x  e.  ( ( S  X.  S ) /.  .~  )  /\  y  e.  (
 ( S  X.  S ) /.  .~  ) ) 
 /\  E. w E. v E. u E. t ( ( x  =  [ <. w ,  v >. ] 
 .~  /\  y  =  [ <. u ,  t >. ]  .~  )  /\  z  =  [ ( <. w ,  v >.  .+ 
 <. u ,  t >. ) ]  .~  ) ) }   =>    |- 
 Fun  G
 
Theoremth3q 6377* Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60, extended to operations on ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
 |- 
 .~  e.  _V   &    |-  .~  Er  ( S  X.  S )   &    |-  (
 ( ( ( w  e.  S  /\  v  e.  S )  /\  ( u  e.  S  /\  t  e.  S )
 )  /\  ( (
 s  e.  S  /\  f  e.  S )  /\  ( g  e.  S  /\  h  e.  S ) ) )  ->  ( ( <. w ,  v >.  .~  <. u ,  t >.  /\  <. s ,  f >.  .~  <. g ,  h >. )  ->  ( <. w ,  v >.  .+ 
 <. s ,  f >. ) 
 .~  ( <. u ,  t >.  .+  <. g ,  h >. ) ) )   &    |-  G  =  { <. <. x ,  y >. ,  z >.  |  ( ( x  e.  ( ( S  X.  S ) /.  .~  )  /\  y  e.  (
 ( S  X.  S ) /.  .~  ) ) 
 /\  E. w E. v E. u E. t ( ( x  =  [ <. w ,  v >. ] 
 .~  /\  y  =  [ <. u ,  t >. ]  .~  )  /\  z  =  [ ( <. w ,  v >.  .+ 
 <. u ,  t >. ) ]  .~  ) ) }   =>    |-  ( ( ( A  e.  S  /\  B  e.  S )  /\  ( C  e.  S  /\  D  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. A ,  B >. ] 
 .~  G [ <. C ,  D >. ]  .~  )  =  [ ( <. A ,  B >.  .+ 
 <. C ,  D >. ) ]  .~  )
 
Theoremoviec 6378* Express an operation on equivalence classes of ordered pairs in terms of equivalence class of operations on ordered pairs. See iset.mm for additional comments describing the hypotheses. (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2013.)
 |-  ( ( ( A  e.  S  /\  B  e.  S )  /\  ( C  e.  S  /\  D  e.  S )
 )  ->  H  e.  ( S  X.  S ) )   &    |-  ( ( ( a  e.  S  /\  b  e.  S )  /\  ( g  e.  S  /\  h  e.  S ) )  ->  K  e.  ( S  X.  S ) )   &    |-  ( ( ( c  e.  S  /\  d  e.  S )  /\  ( t  e.  S  /\  s  e.  S ) )  ->  L  e.  ( S  X.  S ) )   &    |-  .~  e.  _V   &    |-  .~  Er  ( S  X.  S )   &    |- 
 .~  =  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ( ( x  e.  ( S  X.  S )  /\  y  e.  ( S  X.  S ) )  /\  E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x  =  <. z ,  w >.  /\  y  = 
 <. v ,  u >. ) 
 /\  ph ) ) }   &    |-  (
 ( ( z  =  a  /\  w  =  b )  /\  (
 v  =  c  /\  u  =  d )
 )  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) )   &    |-  ( ( ( z  =  g  /\  w  =  h )  /\  ( v  =  t 
 /\  u  =  s ) )  ->  ( ph 
 <->  ch ) )   &    |-  .+  =  { <. <. x ,  y >. ,  z >.  |  ( ( x  e.  ( S  X.  S )  /\  y  e.  ( S  X.  S ) )  /\  E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x  =  <. w ,  v >.  /\  y  =  <. u ,  f >. ) 
 /\  z  =  J ) ) }   &    |-  (
 ( ( w  =  a  /\  v  =  b )  /\  ( u  =  g  /\  f  =  h )
 )  ->  J  =  K )   &    |-  ( ( ( w  =  c  /\  v  =  d )  /\  ( u  =  t 
 /\  f  =  s ) )  ->  J  =  L )   &    |-  ( ( ( w  =  A  /\  v  =  B )  /\  ( u  =  C  /\  f  =  D ) )  ->  J  =  H )   &    |-  .+^  =  { <. <. x ,  y >. ,  z >.  |  (
 ( x  e.  Q  /\  y  e.  Q )  /\  E. a E. b E. c E. d
 ( ( x  =  [ <. a ,  b >. ]  .~  /\  y  =  [ <. c ,  d >. ]  .~  )  /\  z  =  [ ( <. a ,  b >.  .+ 
 <. c ,  d >. ) ]  .~  ) ) }   &    |-  Q  =  ( ( S  X.  S ) /.  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( ( a  e.  S  /\  b  e.  S )  /\  (
 c  e.  S  /\  d  e.  S )
 )  /\  ( (
 g  e.  S  /\  h  e.  S )  /\  ( t  e.  S  /\  s  e.  S ) ) )  ->  ( ( ps  /\  ch )  ->  K  .~  L ) )   =>    |-  ( ( ( A  e.  S  /\  B  e.  S )  /\  ( C  e.  S  /\  D  e.  S ) )  ->  ( [ <. A ,  B >. ] 
 .~  .+^  [ <. C ,  D >. ]  .~  )  =  [ H ]  .~  )
 
Theoremecovcom 6379* Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation. Most uses will want ecovicom 6380 instead. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
 |-  C  =  ( ( S  X.  S )
 /.  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  (
 z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. x ,  y >. ] 
 .~  .+  [ <. z ,  w >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. D ,  G >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )  /\  ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. z ,  w >. ] 
 .~  .+  [ <. x ,  y >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. H ,  J >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  D  =  H   &    |-  G  =  J   =>    |-  (
 ( A  e.  C  /\  B  e.  C ) 
 ->  ( A  .+  B )  =  ( B  .+  A ) )
 
Theoremecovicom 6380* Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Sep-2019.)
 |-  C  =  ( ( S  X.  S )
 /.  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  (
 z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. x ,  y >. ] 
 .~  .+  [ <. z ,  w >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. D ,  G >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )  /\  ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. z ,  w >. ] 
 .~  .+  [ <. x ,  y >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. H ,  J >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  (
 z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )
 )  ->  D  =  H )   &    |-  ( ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  ( z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S ) )  ->  G  =  J )   =>    |-  ( ( A  e.  C  /\  B  e.  C )  ->  ( A  .+  B )  =  ( B  .+  A ) )
 
Theoremecovass 6381* Lemma used to transfer an associative law via an equivalence relation. In most cases ecoviass 6382 will be more useful. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
 |-  D  =  ( ( S  X.  S )
 /.  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  (
 z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. x ,  y >. ] 
 .~  .+  [ <. z ,  w >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. G ,  H >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )  /\  (
 v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. z ,  w >. ] 
 .~  .+  [ <. v ,  u >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. N ,  Q >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( G  e.  S  /\  H  e.  S )  /\  ( v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S ) )  ->  ( [ <. G ,  H >. ]  .~  .+  [ <. v ,  u >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. J ,  K >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  ( N  e.  S  /\  Q  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. x ,  y >. ] 
 .~  .+  [ <. N ,  Q >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. L ,  M >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  (
 z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( G  e.  S  /\  H  e.  S ) )   &    |-  (
 ( ( z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )  /\  (
 v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( N  e.  S  /\  Q  e.  S ) )   &    |-  J  =  L   &    |-  K  =  M   =>    |-  (
 ( A  e.  D  /\  B  e.  D  /\  C  e.  D )  ->  ( ( A  .+  B )  .+  C )  =  ( A  .+  ( B  .+  C ) ) )
 
Theoremecoviass 6382* Lemma used to transfer an associative law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2019.)
 |-  D  =  ( ( S  X.  S )
 /.  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  (
 z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. x ,  y >. ] 
 .~  .+  [ <. z ,  w >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. G ,  H >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )  /\  (
 v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. z ,  w >. ] 
 .~  .+  [ <. v ,  u >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. N ,  Q >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( G  e.  S  /\  H  e.  S )  /\  ( v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S ) )  ->  ( [ <. G ,  H >. ]  .~  .+  [ <. v ,  u >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. J ,  K >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  ( N  e.  S  /\  Q  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. x ,  y >. ] 
 .~  .+  [ <. N ,  Q >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. L ,  M >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  (
 z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( G  e.  S  /\  H  e.  S ) )   &    |-  (
 ( ( z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )  /\  (
 v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( N  e.  S  /\  Q  e.  S ) )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  (
 z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )  /\  ( v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S ) )  ->  J  =  L )   &    |-  ( ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  ( z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )  /\  ( v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S ) )  ->  K  =  M )   =>    |-  (
 ( A  e.  D  /\  B  e.  D  /\  C  e.  D )  ->  ( ( A  .+  B )  .+  C )  =  ( A  .+  ( B  .+  C ) ) )
 
Theoremecovdi 6383* Lemma used to transfer a distributive law via an equivalence relation. Most likely ecovidi 6384 will be more helpful. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
 |-  D  =  ( ( S  X.  S )
 /.  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )  /\  (
 v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. z ,  w >. ] 
 .~  .+  [ <. v ,  u >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. M ,  N >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  ( M  e.  S  /\  N  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. x ,  y >. ] 
 .~  .x.  [ <. M ,  N >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. H ,  J >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  (
 z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. x ,  y >. ] 
 .~  .x.  [ <. z ,  w >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. W ,  X >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  (
 v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. x ,  y >. ] 
 .~  .x.  [ <. v ,  u >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. Y ,  Z >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( W  e.  S  /\  X  e.  S )  /\  ( Y  e.  S  /\  Z  e.  S ) )  ->  ( [ <. W ,  X >. ] 
 .~  .+  [ <. Y ,  Z >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. K ,  L >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )  /\  (
 v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( M  e.  S  /\  N  e.  S ) )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  (
 z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( W  e.  S  /\  X  e.  S ) )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  (
 v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( Y  e.  S  /\  Z  e.  S ) )   &    |-  H  =  K   &    |-  J  =  L   =>    |-  (
 ( A  e.  D  /\  B  e.  D  /\  C  e.  D )  ->  ( A  .x.  ( B  .+  C ) )  =  ( ( A 
 .x.  B )  .+  ( A  .x.  C ) ) )
 
Theoremecovidi 6384* Lemma used to transfer a distributive law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Sep-2019.)
 |-  D  =  ( ( S  X.  S )
 /.  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )  /\  (
 v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. z ,  w >. ] 
 .~  .+  [ <. v ,  u >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. M ,  N >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  ( M  e.  S  /\  N  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. x ,  y >. ] 
 .~  .x.  [ <. M ,  N >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. H ,  J >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  (
 z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. x ,  y >. ] 
 .~  .x.  [ <. z ,  w >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. W ,  X >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  (
 v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( [ <. x ,  y >. ] 
 .~  .x.  [ <. v ,  u >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. Y ,  Z >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( W  e.  S  /\  X  e.  S )  /\  ( Y  e.  S  /\  Z  e.  S ) )  ->  ( [ <. W ,  X >. ] 
 .~  .+  [ <. Y ,  Z >. ]  .~  )  =  [ <. K ,  L >. ]  .~  )   &    |-  (
 ( ( z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )  /\  (
 v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( M  e.  S  /\  N  e.  S ) )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  (
 z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( W  e.  S  /\  X  e.  S ) )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  (
 v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S )
 )  ->  ( Y  e.  S  /\  Z  e.  S ) )   &    |-  (
 ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  (
 z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )  /\  ( v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S ) )  ->  H  =  K )   &    |-  ( ( ( x  e.  S  /\  y  e.  S )  /\  ( z  e.  S  /\  w  e.  S )  /\  ( v  e.  S  /\  u  e.  S ) )  ->  J  =  L )   =>    |-  (
 ( A  e.  D  /\  B  e.  D  /\  C  e.  D )  ->  ( A  .x.  ( B  .+  C ) )  =  ( ( A 
 .x.  B )  .+  ( A  .x.  C ) ) )
 
2.6.25  The mapping operation
 
Syntaxcmap 6385 Extend the definition of a class to include the mapping operation. (Read for  A  ^m  B, "the set of all functions that map from  B to  A.)
 class  ^m
 
Syntaxcpm 6386 Extend the definition of a class to include the partial mapping operation. (Read for  A  ^pm  B, "the set of all partial functions that map from  B to  A.)
 class  ^pm
 
Definitiondf-map 6387* Define the mapping operation or set exponentiation. The set of all functions that map from  B to  A is written  ( A  ^m  B ) (see mapval 6397). Many authors write  A followed by  B as a superscript for this operation and rely on context to avoid confusion other exponentiation operations (e.g., Definition 10.42 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 95). Other authors show 
B as a prefixed superscript, which is read " A pre  B " (e.g., definition of [Enderton] p. 52). Definition 8.21 of [Eisenberg] p. 125 uses the notation Map( B,  A) for our  ( A  ^m  B ). The up-arrow is used by Donald Knuth for iterated exponentiation (Science 194, 1235-1242, 1976). We adopt the first case of his notation (simple exponentiation) and subscript it with m to distinguish it from other kinds of exponentiation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.)
 |- 
 ^m  =  ( x  e.  _V ,  y  e.  _V  |->  { f  |  f : y --> x }
 )
 
Definitiondf-pm 6388* Define the partial mapping operation. A partial function from  B to  A is a function from a subset of  B to  A. The set of all partial functions from  B to  A is written  ( A  ^pm  B ) (see pmvalg 6396). A notation for this operation apparently does not appear in the literature. We use 
^pm to distinguish it from the less general set exponentiation operation  ^m (df-map 6387) . See mapsspm 6419 for its relationship to set exponentiation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2007.)
 |- 
 ^pm  =  ( x  e.  _V ,  y  e. 
 _V  |->  { f  e.  ~P ( y  X.  x )  |  Fun  f }
 )
 
Theoremmapprc 6389* When  A is a proper class, the class of all functions mapping  A to  B is empty. Exercise 4.41 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.)
 |-  ( -.  A  e.  _V 
 ->  { f  |  f : A --> B }  =  (/) )
 
Theorempmex 6390* The class of all partial functions from one set to another is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2007.)
 |-  ( ( A  e.  C  /\  B  e.  D )  ->  { f  |  ( Fun  f  /\  f  C_  ( A  X.  B ) ) }  e.  _V )
 
Theoremmapex 6391* The class of all functions mapping one set to another is a set. Remark after Definition 10.24 of [Kunen] p. 31. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 4-Dec-2003.)
 |-  ( ( A  e.  C  /\  B  e.  D )  ->  { f  |  f : A --> B }  e.  _V )
 
Theoremfnmap 6392 Set exponentiation has a universal domain. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
 |- 
 ^m  Fn  ( _V  X. 
 _V )
 
Theoremfnpm 6393 Partial function exponentiation has a universal domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2013.)
 |- 
 ^pm  Fn  ( _V  X. 
 _V )
 
Theoremreldmmap 6394 Set exponentiation is a well-behaved binary operator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Feb-2015.)
 |- 
 Rel  dom  ^m
 
Theoremmapvalg 6395* The value of set exponentiation.  ( A  ^m  B
) is the set of all functions that map from  B to  A. Definition 10.24 of [Kunen] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
 |-  ( ( A  e.  C  /\  B  e.  D )  ->  ( A  ^m  B )  =  {
 f  |  f : B --> A } )
 
Theorempmvalg 6396* The value of the partial mapping operation.  ( A  ^pm  B ) is the set of all partial functions that map from  B to  A. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
 |-  ( ( A  e.  C  /\  B  e.  D )  ->  ( A  ^pm  B )  =  { f  e.  ~P ( B  X.  A )  |  Fun  f } )
 
Theoremmapval 6397* The value of set exponentiation (inference version).  ( A  ^m  B ) is the set of all functions that map from  B to  A. Definition 10.24 of [Kunen] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   &    |-  B  e.  _V   =>    |-  ( A  ^m  B )  =  { f  |  f : B --> A }
 
Theoremelmapg 6398 Membership relation for set exponentiation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
 |-  ( ( A  e.  V  /\  B  e.  W )  ->  ( C  e.  ( A  ^m  B )  <->  C : B --> A ) )
 
Theoremelmapd 6399 Deduction form of elmapg 6398. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2020.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  V )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  W )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( C  e.  ( A 
 ^m  B )  <->  C : B --> A ) )
 
Theoremmapdm0 6400 The empty set is the only map with empty domain. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.) (Proof shortened by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Dec-2021.)
 |-  ( B  e.  V  ->  ( B  ^m  (/) )  =  { (/) } )
    < Previous  Next >

Page List
Jump to page: Contents  1 1-100 2 101-200 3 201-300 4 301-400 5 401-500 6 501-600 7 601-700 8 701-800 9 801-900 10 901-1000 11 1001-1100 12 1101-1200 13 1201-1300 14 1301-1400 15 1401-1500 16 1501-1600 17 1601-1700 18 1701-1800 19 1801-1900 20 1901-2000 21 2001-2100 22 2101-2200 23 2201-2300 24 2301-2400 25 2401-2500 26 2501-2600 27 2601-2700 28 2701-2800 29 2801-2900 30 2901-3000 31 3001-3100 32 3101-3200 33 3201-3300 34 3301-3400 35 3401-3500 36 3501-3600 37 3601-3700 38 3701-3800 39 3801-3900 40 3901-4000 41 4001-4100 42 4101-4200 43 4201-4300 44 4301-4400 45 4401-4500 46 4501-4600 47 4601-4700 48 4701-4800 49 4801-4900 50 4901-5000 51 5001-5100 52 5101-5200 53 5201-5300 54 5301-5400 55 5401-5500 56 5501-5600 57 5601-5700 58 5701-5800 59 5801-5900 60 5901-6000 61 6001-6100 62 6101-6200 63 6201-6300 64 6301-6400 65 6401-6500 66 6501-6600 67 6601-6700 68 6701-6800 69 6801-6900 70 6901-7000 71 7001-7100 72 7101-7200 73 7201-7300 74 7301-7400 75 7401-7500 76 7501-7600 77 7601-7700 78 7701-7800 79 7801-7900 80 7901-8000 81 8001-8100 82 8101-8200 83 8201-8300 84 8301-8400 85 8401-8500 86 8501-8600 87 8601-8700 88 8701-8800 89 8801-8900 90 8901-9000 91 9001-9100 92 9101-9200 93 9201-9300 94 9301-9400 95 9401-9500 96 9501-9600 97 9601-9700 98 9701-9800 99 9801-9900 100 9901-10000 101 10001-10100 102 10101-10200 103 10201-10300 104 10301-10400 105 10401-10500 106 10501-10600 107 10601-10700 108 10701-10800 109 10801-10900 110 10901-11000 111 11001-11100 112 11101-11200 113 11201-11300 114 11301-11400 115 11401-11500 116 11501-11584
  Copyright terms: Public domain < Previous  Next >