Theorem bdss 16157

Description: The inclusion of a setvar in a bounded class is a bounded formula. Note: apparently, we cannot prove from the present axioms that equality of two bounded classes is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bdss.1	⊢ BOUNDED 𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdss	⊢ BOUNDED 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴

Proof of Theorem bdss

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdss.1	. . . 4 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝐴
2	1	bdeli 16139	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
3	2	ax-bdal 16111	. 2 ⊢ BOUNDED ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
4		dfss3 3213	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
5	3, 4	bd0r 16118	1 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴

Syntax hints:   ∈ wcel 2200  ∀wral 2508   ⊆ wss 3197  BOUNDED wbd 16105  BOUNDED wbdc 16133

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-11 1552  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-ext 2211  ax-bd0 16106  ax-bdal 16111

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-ral 2513  df-in 3203  df-ss 3210  df-bdc 16134

This theorem is referenced by:  bdeq0  16160  bdcpw  16162  bdvsn  16167  bdop  16168  bdeqsuc  16174  bj-nntrans  16244  bj-omtrans  16249