Theorem bj-omtrans 16672

Description: The set ω is transitive. A natural number is included in ω. Constructive proof of elomssom 4709.

The idea is to use bounded induction with the formula 𝑥 ⊆ ω. This formula, in a logic with terms, is bounded. So in our logic without terms, we need to temporarily replace it with 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 and then deduce the original claim. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-omtrans	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ ω)

Proof of Theorem bj-omtrans

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑎 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-omex 16658	. . 3 ⊢ ω ∈ V
2		sseq2 3252	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 = ω → (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑦 ⊆ ω))
3		sseq2 3252	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 = ω → (suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎 ↔ suc 𝑦 ⊆ ω))
4	2, 3	imbi12d 234	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = ω → ((𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎 → suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎) ↔ (𝑦 ⊆ ω → suc 𝑦 ⊆ ω)))
5	4	ralbidv 2533	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = ω → (∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎 → suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ⊆ ω → suc 𝑦 ⊆ ω)))
6		sseq2 3252	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = ω → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑎 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ ω))
7	6	imbi2d 230	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = ω → ((𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑎) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ ω)))
8	5, 7	imbi12d 234	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = ω → ((∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎 → suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎) → (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑎)) ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ⊆ ω → suc 𝑦 ⊆ ω) → (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ ω))))
9		0ss 3535	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ⊆ 𝑎
10		bdcv 16564	. . . . . 6 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑎
11	10	bdss 16580	. . . . 5 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎
12		nfv 1577	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∅ ⊆ 𝑎
13		nfv 1577	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎
14		nfv 1577	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎
15		sseq1 3251	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ↔ ∅ ⊆ 𝑎))
16	15	biimprd 158	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (∅ ⊆ 𝑎 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎))
17		sseq1 3251	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎))
18	17	biimpd 144	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 → 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎))
19		sseq1 3251	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ↔ suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎))
20	19	biimprd 158	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎))
21		nfcv 2375	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
22		nfv 1577	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑎
23		sseq1 3251	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑎))
24	23	biimpd 144	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑎))
25	11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24	bj-bdfindisg 16664	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∅ ⊆ 𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎 → suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎)) → (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑎))
26	9, 25	mpan 424	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎 → suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎) → (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑎))
27	1, 8, 26	vtocl 2859	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ⊆ ω → suc 𝑦 ⊆ ω) → (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ ω))
28		df-suc 4474	. . . 4 ⊢ suc 𝑦 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑦})
29		simpr 110	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ ω) → 𝑦 ⊆ ω)
30		simpl 109	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ ω) → 𝑦 ∈ ω)
31	30	snssd 3823	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ ω) → {𝑦} ⊆ ω)
32	29, 31	unssd 3385	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ ω) → (𝑦 ∪ {𝑦}) ⊆ ω)
33	28, 32	eqsstrid 3274	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ ω) → suc 𝑦 ⊆ ω)
34	33	ex 115	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝑦 ⊆ ω → suc 𝑦 ⊆ ω))
35	27, 34	mprg 2590	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ ω)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1398   ∈ wcel 2202  ∀wral 2511   ∪ cun 3199   ⊆ wss 3201  ∅c0 3496  {csn 3673  suc csuc 4468  ωcom 4694

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2204  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-nul 4220  ax-pr 4305  ax-un 4536  ax-bd0 16529  ax-bdor 16532  ax-bdal 16534  ax-bdex 16535  ax-bdeq 16536  ax-bdel 16537  ax-bdsb 16538  ax-bdsep 16600  ax-infvn 16657

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2364  df-ral 2516  df-rex 2517  df-rab 2520  df-v 2805  df-dif 3203  df-un 3205  df-in 3207  df-ss 3214  df-nul 3497  df-sn 3679  df-pr 3680  df-uni 3899  df-int 3934  df-suc 4474  df-iom 4695  df-bdc 16557  df-bj-ind 16643

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-omtrans2  16673  bj-nnord  16674  bj-nn0suc  16680