Theorem sban 1929

Description: Conjunction inside and outside of a substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sban	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))

Proof of Theorem sban

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbanv 1862	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2	1	sbbii 1739	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑧]([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓))
3		sbanv 1862	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓))
4	2, 3	bitri 183	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓))
5		ax-17 1507	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑧(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
6	5	sbco2vh 1919	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
7		ax-17 1507	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)
8	7	sbco2vh 1919	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
9		ax-17 1507	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑧𝜓)
10	9	sbco2vh 1919	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
11	8, 10	anbi12i 456	. 2 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
12	4, 6, 11	3bitr3i 209	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104  [wsb 1736

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-4 1488  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737

This theorem is referenced by:  sb3an  1932  sbbi  1933  sbmo  2059  moanim  2074  sbabel  2308  nfrexdya  2473  cbvreu  2655  rmo3f  2885  sbcan  2955  sbcang  2956  rmo3  3004  inab  3349  difab  3350  exss  4157  inopab  4679  bdcriota  13252