ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  imadiflem GIF version

Theorem imadiflem 5108
Description: One direction of imadif 5109. This direction does not require Fun 𝐹. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Dec-2018.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
imadiflem ((𝐹𝐴) ∖ (𝐹𝐵)) ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝐴𝐵))

Proof of Theorem imadiflem
Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-rex 2366 . . . 4 (∃𝑥𝐴 𝑥𝐹𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦))
2 df-rex 2366 . . . . 5 (∃𝑥𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦))
32notbii 630 . . . 4 (¬ ∃𝑥𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦))
4 alnex 1434 . . . . . . 7 (∀𝑥 ¬ (𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦))
5 19.29r 1558 . . . . . . 7 ((∃𝑥(𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑥 ¬ (𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦)) → ∃𝑥((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∧ ¬ (𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦)))
64, 5sylan2br 283 . . . . . 6 ((∃𝑥(𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦)) → ∃𝑥((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∧ ¬ (𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦)))
7 simpl 108 . . . . . . . . 9 (((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∧ ¬ (𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦)) → (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦))
8 simplr 498 . . . . . . . . . 10 (((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∧ ¬ (𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦)) → 𝑥𝐹𝑦)
9 simpr 109 . . . . . . . . . . 11 (((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∧ ¬ (𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦)) → ¬ (𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦))
10 ancom 263 . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ((𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦) ↔ (𝑥𝐹𝑦𝑥𝐵))
1110notbii 630 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 (¬ (𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦) ↔ ¬ (𝑥𝐹𝑦𝑥𝐵))
12 imnan 660 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 ((𝑥𝐹𝑦 → ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ↔ ¬ (𝑥𝐹𝑦𝑥𝐵))
1311, 12bitr4i 186 . . . . . . . . . . 11 (¬ (𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦) ↔ (𝑥𝐹𝑦 → ¬ 𝑥𝐵))
149, 13sylib 121 . . . . . . . . . 10 (((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∧ ¬ (𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦 → ¬ 𝑥𝐵))
158, 14mpd 13 . . . . . . . . 9 (((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∧ ¬ (𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦)) → ¬ 𝑥𝐵)
167, 15, 8jca32 304 . . . . . . . 8 (((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∧ ¬ (𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦)) → ((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∧ (¬ 𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦)))
17 eldif 3011 . . . . . . . . . 10 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ↔ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵))
1817anbi1i 447 . . . . . . . . 9 ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝐹𝑦) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝐹𝑦))
19 anandir 559 . . . . . . . . 9 (((𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝐹𝑦) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∧ (¬ 𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦)))
2018, 19bitri 183 . . . . . . . 8 ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝐹𝑦) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∧ (¬ 𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦)))
2116, 20sylibr 133 . . . . . . 7 (((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∧ ¬ (𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝐹𝑦))
2221eximi 1537 . . . . . 6 (∃𝑥((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∧ ¬ (𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦)) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝐹𝑦))
236, 22syl 14 . . . . 5 ((∃𝑥(𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦)) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝐹𝑦))
24 df-rex 2366 . . . . 5 (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵)𝑥𝐹𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝐹𝑦))
2523, 24sylibr 133 . . . 4 ((∃𝑥(𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐹𝑦)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵)𝑥𝐹𝑦)
261, 3, 25syl2anb 286 . . 3 ((∃𝑥𝐴 𝑥𝐹𝑦 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑥𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵)𝑥𝐹𝑦)
2726ss2abi 3096 . 2 {𝑦 ∣ (∃𝑥𝐴 𝑥𝐹𝑦 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑥𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)} ⊆ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵)𝑥𝐹𝑦}
28 dfima2 4791 . . . 4 (𝐹𝐴) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐴 𝑥𝐹𝑦}
29 dfima2 4791 . . . 4 (𝐹𝐵) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦}
3028, 29difeq12i 3119 . . 3 ((𝐹𝐴) ∖ (𝐹𝐵)) = ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐴 𝑥𝐹𝑦} ∖ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦})
31 difab 3271 . . 3 ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐴 𝑥𝐹𝑦} ∖ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦}) = {𝑦 ∣ (∃𝑥𝐴 𝑥𝐹𝑦 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑥𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)}
3230, 31eqtri 2109 . 2 ((𝐹𝐴) ∖ (𝐹𝐵)) = {𝑦 ∣ (∃𝑥𝐴 𝑥𝐹𝑦 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑥𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)}
33 dfima2 4791 . 2 (𝐹 “ (𝐴𝐵)) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵)𝑥𝐹𝑦}
3427, 32, 333sstr4i 3068 1 ((𝐹𝐴) ∖ (𝐹𝐵)) ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝐴𝐵))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wa 103  wal 1288  wex 1427  wcel 1439  {cab 2075  wrex 2361  cdif 2999  wss 3002   class class class wbr 3853  cima 4457
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 580  ax-in2 581  ax-io 666  ax-5 1382  ax-7 1383  ax-gen 1384  ax-ie1 1428  ax-ie2 1429  ax-8 1441  ax-10 1442  ax-11 1443  ax-i12 1444  ax-bndl 1445  ax-4 1446  ax-14 1451  ax-17 1465  ax-i9 1469  ax-ial 1473  ax-i5r 1474  ax-ext 2071  ax-sep 3965  ax-pow 4017  ax-pr 4047
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 927  df-tru 1293  df-fal 1296  df-nf 1396  df-sb 1694  df-eu 1952  df-mo 1953  df-clab 2076  df-cleq 2082  df-clel 2085  df-nfc 2218  df-ral 2365  df-rex 2366  df-rab 2369  df-v 2624  df-dif 3004  df-un 3006  df-in 3008  df-ss 3015  df-pw 3437  df-sn 3458  df-pr 3459  df-op 3461  df-br 3854  df-opab 3908  df-xp 4460  df-cnv 4462  df-dm 4464  df-rn 4465  df-res 4466  df-ima 4467
This theorem is referenced by:  imadif  5109
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator