Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > iunrab | GIF version |
Description: The indexed union of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
iunrab | ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | iunab 3897 | . 2 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | df-rab 2444 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
3 | 2 | a1i 9 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
4 | 3 | iuneq2i 3869 | . 2 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} |
5 | df-rab 2444 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)} | |
6 | r19.42v 2614 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | |
7 | 6 | abbii 2273 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)} |
8 | 5, 7 | eqtr4i 2181 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} |
9 | 1, 4, 8 | 3eqtr4i 2188 | 1 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 103 = wceq 1335 ∈ wcel 2128 {cab 2143 ∃wrex 2436 {crab 2439 ∪ ciun 3851 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 699 ax-5 1427 ax-7 1428 ax-gen 1429 ax-ie1 1473 ax-ie2 1474 ax-8 1484 ax-10 1485 ax-11 1486 ax-i12 1487 ax-bndl 1489 ax-4 1490 ax-17 1506 ax-i9 1510 ax-ial 1514 ax-i5r 1515 ax-ext 2139 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-tru 1338 df-nf 1441 df-sb 1743 df-clab 2144 df-cleq 2150 df-clel 2153 df-nfc 2288 df-ral 2440 df-rex 2441 df-rab 2444 df-v 2714 df-in 3108 df-ss 3115 df-iun 3853 |
This theorem is referenced by: hashrabrex 11390 phisum 12131 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |