![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > iunrab | GIF version |
Description: The indexed union of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
iunrab | ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | iunab 3823 | . 2 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | df-rab 2397 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
3 | 2 | a1i 9 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
4 | 3 | iuneq2i 3795 | . 2 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} |
5 | df-rab 2397 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)} | |
6 | r19.42v 2560 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | |
7 | 6 | abbii 2228 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)} |
8 | 5, 7 | eqtr4i 2136 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} |
9 | 1, 4, 8 | 3eqtr4i 2143 | 1 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 103 = wceq 1312 ∈ wcel 1461 {cab 2099 ∃wrex 2389 {crab 2392 ∪ ciun 3777 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 681 ax-5 1404 ax-7 1405 ax-gen 1406 ax-ie1 1450 ax-ie2 1451 ax-8 1463 ax-10 1464 ax-11 1465 ax-i12 1466 ax-bndl 1467 ax-4 1468 ax-17 1487 ax-i9 1491 ax-ial 1495 ax-i5r 1496 ax-ext 2095 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-tru 1315 df-nf 1418 df-sb 1717 df-clab 2100 df-cleq 2106 df-clel 2109 df-nfc 2242 df-ral 2393 df-rex 2394 df-rab 2397 df-v 2657 df-in 3041 df-ss 3048 df-iun 3779 |
This theorem is referenced by: hashrabrex 11136 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |