![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > iunrab | GIF version |
Description: The indexed union of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
iunrab | ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | iunab 3959 | . 2 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | df-rab 2481 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
3 | 2 | a1i 9 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
4 | 3 | iuneq2i 3930 | . 2 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} |
5 | df-rab 2481 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)} | |
6 | r19.42v 2651 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | |
7 | 6 | abbii 2309 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)} |
8 | 5, 7 | eqtr4i 2217 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} |
9 | 1, 4, 8 | 3eqtr4i 2224 | 1 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 104 = wceq 1364 ∈ wcel 2164 {cab 2179 ∃wrex 2473 {crab 2476 ∪ ciun 3912 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1458 ax-7 1459 ax-gen 1460 ax-ie1 1504 ax-ie2 1505 ax-8 1515 ax-10 1516 ax-11 1517 ax-i12 1518 ax-bndl 1520 ax-4 1521 ax-17 1537 ax-i9 1541 ax-ial 1545 ax-i5r 1546 ax-ext 2175 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1367 df-nf 1472 df-sb 1774 df-clab 2180 df-cleq 2186 df-clel 2189 df-nfc 2325 df-ral 2477 df-rex 2478 df-rab 2481 df-v 2762 df-in 3159 df-ss 3166 df-iun 3914 |
This theorem is referenced by: hashrabrex 11624 phisum 12378 lgsquadlem1 15191 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |