Theorem rabss2 3144

Description: Subclass law for restricted abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabss2	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rabss2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm3.45 569	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
2	1	alimi 1412	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
3		dfss2 3050	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4		ss2ab 3129	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
5	2, 3, 4	3imtr4i 200	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)})
6		df-rab 2397	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
7		df-rab 2397	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}
8	5, 6, 7	3sstr4g 3104	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103  ∀wal 1310   ∈ wcel 1461  {cab 2099  {crab 2392   ⊆ wss 3035

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 681  ax-5 1404  ax-7 1405  ax-gen 1406  ax-ie1 1450  ax-ie2 1451  ax-8 1463  ax-10 1464  ax-11 1465  ax-i12 1466  ax-bndl 1467  ax-4 1468  ax-17 1487  ax-i9 1491  ax-ial 1495  ax-i5r 1496  ax-ext 2095

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1418  df-sb 1717  df-clab 2100  df-cleq 2106  df-clel 2109  df-nfc 2242  df-rab 2397  df-in 3041  df-ss 3048

This theorem is referenced by:  sess2  4218  dvfgg  12606