Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabss2 | GIF version |
Description: Subclass law for restricted abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabss2 | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | pm3.45 586 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
2 | 1 | alimi 1431 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
3 | dfss2 3086 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
4 | ss2ab 3165 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
5 | 2, 3, 4 | 3imtr4i 200 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
6 | df-rab 2425 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
7 | df-rab 2425 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
8 | 5, 6, 7 | 3sstr4g 3140 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ∀wal 1329 ∈ wcel 1480 {cab 2125 {crab 2420 ⊆ wss 3071 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 698 ax-5 1423 ax-7 1424 ax-gen 1425 ax-ie1 1469 ax-ie2 1470 ax-8 1482 ax-10 1483 ax-11 1484 ax-i12 1485 ax-bndl 1486 ax-4 1487 ax-17 1506 ax-i9 1510 ax-ial 1514 ax-i5r 1515 ax-ext 2121 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-nf 1437 df-sb 1736 df-clab 2126 df-cleq 2132 df-clel 2135 df-nfc 2270 df-rab 2425 df-in 3077 df-ss 3084 |
This theorem is referenced by: sess2 4260 dvfgg 12826 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |