Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabss2 | GIF version |
Description: Subclass law for restricted abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabss2 | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | pm3.45 587 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
2 | 1 | alimi 1442 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
3 | dfss2 3126 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
4 | ss2ab 3205 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
5 | 2, 3, 4 | 3imtr4i 200 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
6 | df-rab 2451 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
7 | df-rab 2451 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
8 | 5, 6, 7 | 3sstr4g 3180 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ∀wal 1340 ∈ wcel 2135 {cab 2150 {crab 2446 ⊆ wss 3111 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 699 ax-5 1434 ax-7 1435 ax-gen 1436 ax-ie1 1480 ax-ie2 1481 ax-8 1491 ax-10 1492 ax-11 1493 ax-i12 1494 ax-bndl 1496 ax-4 1497 ax-17 1513 ax-i9 1517 ax-ial 1521 ax-i5r 1522 ax-ext 2146 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-nf 1448 df-sb 1750 df-clab 2151 df-cleq 2157 df-clel 2160 df-nfc 2295 df-rab 2451 df-in 3117 df-ss 3124 |
This theorem is referenced by: sess2 4310 zsupssdc 11872 dvfgg 13198 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |