Theorem uneqdifeqim 3577

Description: Two ways that 𝐴 and 𝐵 can "partition" 𝐶 (when 𝐴 and 𝐵 don't overlap and 𝐴 is a part of 𝐶). In classical logic, the second implication would be a biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
uneqdifeqim	⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶 → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem uneqdifeqim

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		uncom 3348	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
2		eqtr 2247	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶) → (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = 𝐶)
3	2	eqcomd 2235	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶) → 𝐶 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴))
4		difeq1 3315	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐶 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴))
5		difun2 3571	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)
6		eqtr 2247	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴))
7		incom 3396	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)
8	7	eqeq1i 2237	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)
9		disj3 3544	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ↔ 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴))
10	8, 9	bitri 184	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴))
11		eqtr 2247	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵)
12	11	expcom 116	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵 → ((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
13	12	eqcoms 2232	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐵 = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) → ((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
14	10, 13	sylbi 121	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
15	6, 14	syl5com 29	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
16	4, 5, 15	sylancl 413	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
17	3, 16	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
18	1, 17	mpan 424	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
19	18	com12 30	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶 → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
20	19	adantl 277	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶 → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1395   ∖ cdif 3194   ∪ cun 3195   ∩ cin 3196   ⊆ wss 3197  ∅c0 3491

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-ext 2211

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1398  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ral 2513  df-rab 2517  df-v 2801  df-dif 3199  df-un 3201  df-in 3203  df-ss 3210  df-nul 3492

This theorem is referenced by: (None)