Theorem uneqdifeqim 3546

Description: Two ways that 𝐴 and 𝐵 can "partition" 𝐶 (when 𝐴 and 𝐵 don't overlap and 𝐴 is a part of 𝐶). In classical logic, the second implication would be a biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
uneqdifeqim	⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶 → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem uneqdifeqim

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		uncom 3317	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
2		eqtr 2223	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶) → (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = 𝐶)
3	2	eqcomd 2211	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶) → 𝐶 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴))
4		difeq1 3284	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐶 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴))
5		difun2 3540	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)
6		eqtr 2223	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴))
7		incom 3365	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)
8	7	eqeq1i 2213	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)
9		disj3 3513	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ↔ 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴))
10	8, 9	bitri 184	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴))
11		eqtr 2223	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵)
12	11	expcom 116	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵 → ((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
13	12	eqcoms 2208	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐵 = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) → ((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
14	10, 13	sylbi 121	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
15	6, 14	syl5com 29	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
16	4, 5, 15	sylancl 413	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
17	3, 16	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
18	1, 17	mpan 424	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
19	18	com12 30	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶 → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
20	19	adantl 277	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶 → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1373   ∖ cdif 3163   ∪ cun 3164   ∩ cin 3165   ⊆ wss 3166  ∅c0 3460

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 711  ax-5 1470  ax-7 1471  ax-gen 1472  ax-ie1 1516  ax-ie2 1517  ax-8 1527  ax-10 1528  ax-11 1529  ax-i12 1530  ax-bndl 1532  ax-4 1533  ax-17 1549  ax-i9 1553  ax-ial 1557  ax-i5r 1558  ax-ext 2187

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1484  df-sb 1786  df-clab 2192  df-cleq 2198  df-clel 2201  df-nfc 2337  df-ral 2489  df-rab 2493  df-v 2774  df-dif 3168  df-un 3170  df-in 3172  df-ss 3179  df-nul 3461

This theorem is referenced by: (None)