Theorem uneqdifeqim 3536

Description: Two ways that 𝐴 and 𝐵 can "partition" 𝐶 (when 𝐴 and 𝐵 don't overlap and 𝐴 is a part of 𝐶). In classical logic, the second implication would be a biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
uneqdifeqim	⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶 → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem uneqdifeqim

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		uncom 3307	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
2		eqtr 2214	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶) → (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = 𝐶)
3	2	eqcomd 2202	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶) → 𝐶 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴))
4		difeq1 3274	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐶 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴))
5		difun2 3530	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)
6		eqtr 2214	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴))
7		incom 3355	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)
8	7	eqeq1i 2204	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)
9		disj3 3503	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ↔ 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴))
10	8, 9	bitri 184	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴))
11		eqtr 2214	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵)
12	11	expcom 116	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵 → ((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
13	12	eqcoms 2199	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐵 = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) → ((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
14	10, 13	sylbi 121	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
15	6, 14	syl5com 29	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
16	4, 5, 15	sylancl 413	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
17	3, 16	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
18	1, 17	mpan 424	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
19	18	com12 30	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶 → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))
20	19	adantl 277	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶 → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1364   ∖ cdif 3154   ∪ cun 3155   ∩ cin 3156   ⊆ wss 3157  ∅c0 3450

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-ext 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-ral 2480  df-rab 2484  df-v 2765  df-dif 3159  df-un 3161  df-in 3163  df-ss 3170  df-nul 3451

This theorem is referenced by: (None)