Theorem 3jcad 1147

Description: Deduction conjoining the consequents of three implications. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2005.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
3jcad.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
3jcad.2	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))
3jcad.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3jcad	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)))

Proof of Theorem 3jcad

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3jcad.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
2	1	imp 412	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
3		3jcad.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))
4	3	imp 412	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)
5		3jcad.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))
6	5	imp 412	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)
7	2, 4, 6	3jca 1146	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))
8	7	ex 418	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-3an 1105

This theorem is used by:  onfununi  8353  uzm1  13003  ixxssixx  13494  iccid  13525  iccsplit  13620  fzen  13678  lmodprop2d  21205  fbun  24165  hausflim  24306  icoopnst  25266  iocopnst  25267  abelth  26774  usgr2pth  30356  shsvs  31931  cnlnssadj  32688  fnrelpredd  35773  trssfir1om  35790  trssfir1omregs  35861  cvmlift2lem10  36164  endofsegid  36943  elicc3  37198  areacirclem1  38720  islvol2aN  40743  alrim3con13v  45610  ormkglobd  47981  bgoldbtbndlem4  49000