| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > iotanul | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Theorem 8.22 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the result if there isn't exactly one 𝑥 that satisfies 𝜑. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| iotanul | ⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∅) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | eu6 2575 | . 2 ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧)) | |
| 2 | dfiota2 6457 | . . 3 ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧)} | |
| 3 | alnex 1783 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑧∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧)) | |
| 4 | dfnul2 4290 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∅ = {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝑧 = 𝑧} | |
| 5 | equid 2014 | . . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ 𝑧 = 𝑧 | |
| 6 | 5 | tbt 369 | . . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ↔ (¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑧)) |
| 7 | 6 | biimpi 216 | . . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑧)) |
| 8 | 7 | con1bid 355 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (¬ 𝑧 = 𝑧 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧))) |
| 9 | 8 | alimi 1813 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → ∀𝑧(¬ 𝑧 = 𝑧 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧))) |
| 10 | abbi 2802 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∀𝑧(¬ 𝑧 = 𝑧 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧)) → {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝑧 = 𝑧} = {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧)}) | |
| 11 | 9, 10 | syl 17 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝑧 = 𝑧} = {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧)}) |
| 12 | 4, 11 | eqtr2id 2785 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧)} = ∅) |
| 13 | 3, 12 | sylbir 235 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑧∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧)} = ∅) |
| 14 | 13 | unieqd 4878 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑧∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧)} = ∪ ∅) |
| 15 | uni0 4893 | . . . 4 ⊢ ∪ ∅ = ∅ | |
| 16 | 14, 15 | eqtrdi 2788 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑧∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧)} = ∅) |
| 17 | 2, 16 | eqtrid 2784 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑧∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∅) |
| 18 | 1, 17 | sylnbi 330 | 1 ⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∅) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∀wal 1540 = wceq 1542 ∃wex 1781 ∃!weu 2569 {cab 2715 ∅c0 4287 ∪ cuni 4865 ℩cio 6454 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2147 ax-11 2163 ax-12 2185 ax-ext 2709 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 849 df-tru 1545 df-fal 1555 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2069 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2570 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2812 df-v 3444 df-dif 3906 df-ss 3920 df-nul 4288 df-sn 4583 df-uni 4866 df-iota 6456 |
| This theorem is referenced by: iotan0 6490 dfiota4 6492 csbiota 6493 tz6.12-2OLD 6830 dffv3 6838 csbriota 7340 riotaund 7364 isf32lem9 10283 grpidval 18598 0g0 18601 iota0ndef 47393 iotan0aiotaex 47447 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |