Theorem bj-mooreset 37803

Description: A Moore collection is a set. Therefore, the class Moore of all Moore sets defined in df-bj-moore 37805 is actually the class of all Moore collections. This is also illustrated by the lack of sethood condition in bj-ismoore 37806.

Note that the closed sets of a topology form a Moore collection, so a topology is a set, and this remark also applies to many other families of sets (namely, as soon as the whole set is required to be a set of the family, then the associated kind of family has no proper classes: that this condition suffices to impose sethood can be seen in this proof, which relies crucially on uniexr 7768).

Note: if, in the above predicate, we substitute 𝒫 𝑋 for 𝐴, then the last ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 could be weakened to ⊆ 𝑋, and then the predicate would be obviously satisfied since ⊢ ∪ 𝒫 𝑋 = 𝑋 (unipw 5433), making 𝒫 𝑋 a Moore collection in this weaker sense, for any class 𝑋, even proper, but the addition of this single case does not add anything interesting. Instead, we have the biconditional bj-discrmoore 37812. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-mooreset	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem bj-mooreset

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0elpw 5328	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ 𝒫 𝐴
2		rint0 4955	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) = ∪ 𝐴)
3	2	eleq1d 2850	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
4	3	rspcv 3579	. . 3 ⊢ (∅ ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
5	1, 4	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
6		uniexr 7768	. 2 ⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
7	5, 6	syl 18	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3081  Vcvv 3457   ∩ cin 3905  ∅c0 4286  𝒫 cpw 4564  ∪ cuni 4874  ∩ cint 4914

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-pw 4566  df-uni 4875  df-int 4915

This theorem is used by:  bj-ismoore  37806