Theorem bj-mooreset 34396

Description: A Moore collection is a set. Therefore, the class Moore of all Moore sets defined in df-bj-moore 34398 is actually the class of all Moore collections. This is also illustrated by the lack of sethood condition in bj-ismoore 34399.

Note that the closed sets of a topology form a Moore collection, so a topology is a set, and this remark also applies to many other families of sets (namely, as soon as the whole set is required to be a set of the family, then the associated kind of family has no proper classes: that this condition suffices to impose sethood can be seen in this proof, which relies crucially on uniexr 7487).

Note: if, in the above predicate, we substitute 𝒫 𝑋 for 𝐴, then the last ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 could be weakened to ⊆ 𝑋, and then the predicate would be obviously satisfied since ⊢ ∪ 𝒫 𝑋 = 𝑋 (unipw 5345) , making 𝒫 𝑋 a Moore collection in this weaker sense, for any class 𝑋, even proper, but the addition of this single case does not add anything interesting. Instead, we have the biconditional bj-discrmoore 34405. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-mooreset	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem bj-mooreset

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0elpw 5258	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ 𝒫 𝐴
2		rint0 4918	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) = ∪ 𝐴)
3	2	eleq1d 2899	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
4	3	rspcv 3620	. . 3 ⊢ (∅ ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
5	1, 4	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
6		uniexr 7487	. 2 ⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
7	5, 6	syl 17	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  ∀wral 3140  Vcvv 3496   ∩ cin 3937  ∅c0 4293  𝒫 cpw 4541  ∪ cuni 4840  ∩ cint 4878

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795  ax-sep 5205  ax-nul 5212  ax-pow 5268

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-ral 3145  df-rab 3149  df-v 3498  df-dif 3941  df-in 3945  df-ss 3954  df-nul 4294  df-pw 4543  df-uni 4841  df-int 4879

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-ismoore  34399