Theorem bnj1071 34967

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 35000. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bnj1071.7	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1071	⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → E Fr 𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj1071

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1071.7	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
2	1	bnj923 34758	. 2 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝑛 ∈ ω)
3		nnord 7850	. 2 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ω → Ord 𝑛)
4		ordfr 6347	. 2 ⊢ (Ord 𝑛 → E Fr 𝑛)
5	2, 3, 4	3syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → E Fr 𝑛)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109   ∖ cdif 3911  ∅c0 4296  {csn 4589   E cep 5537   Fr wfr 5588  Ord word 6331  ωcom 7842

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2701

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1543  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-ral 3045  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-dif 3917  df-ss 3931  df-uni 4872  df-tr 5215  df-po 5546  df-so 5547  df-fr 5591  df-we 5593  df-ord 6335  df-on 6336  df-om 7843

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1030  34977  bnj1133  34979