Theorem bnj1071 32857

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 32890. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bnj1071.7	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1071	⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → E Fr 𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj1071

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1071.7	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
2	1	bnj923 32648	. 2 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝑛 ∈ ω)
3		nnord 7695	. 2 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ω → Ord 𝑛)
4		ordfr 6266	. 2 ⊢ (Ord 𝑛 → E Fr 𝑛)
5	2, 3, 4	3syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → E Fr 𝑛)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108   ∖ cdif 3880  ∅c0 4253  {csn 4558   E cep 5485   Fr wfr 5532  Ord word 6250  ωcom 7687

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1784  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-ral 3068  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-dif 3886  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-uni 4837  df-tr 5188  df-po 5494  df-so 5495  df-fr 5535  df-we 5537  df-ord 6254  df-on 6255  df-om 7688

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1030  32867  bnj1133  32869