MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  dedth3h Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem dedth3h 4542
Description: Weak deduction theorem eliminating three hypotheses. See comments in dedth2h 4541. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
dedth3h.1 (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))
dedth3h.2 (𝐵 = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))
dedth3h.3 (𝐶 = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))
dedth3h.4 𝜁
Assertion
Ref Expression
dedth3h ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Proof of Theorem dedth3h
StepHypRef Expression
1 dedth3h.1 . . . 4 (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))
21imbi2d 343 . . 3 (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏)))
3 dedth3h.2 . . . 4 (𝐵 = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))
4 dedth3h.3 . . . 4 (𝐶 = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))
5 dedth3h.4 . . . 4 𝜁
63, 4, 5dedth2h 4541 . . 3 ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏)
72, 6dedth 4540 . 2 (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))
873impib 1134 1 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569  ifcif 4481
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-if 4482
This theorem is used by:  dedth3v  4545  faclbnd4lem2  14442  dvdsle  16486  gcdaddm  16703  ipdiri  31438  hvaddcan  31678  hvsubadd  31685  norm3dif  31758  omlsii  32011  chjass  32141  ledi  32148  spansncv  32261  pjcjt2  32300  pjopyth  32328  hoaddass  32390  hocsubdir  32393  hoddi  32598
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator