| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > dedth3h | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Weak deduction theorem eliminating three hypotheses. See comments in dedth2h 4537. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| dedth3h.1 | ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) |
| dedth3h.2 | ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) |
| dedth3h.3 | ⊢ (𝐶 = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁)) |
| dedth3h.4 | ⊢ 𝜁 |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| dedth3h | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | dedth3h.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) | |
| 2 | 1 | imbi2d 342 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏))) |
| 3 | dedth3h.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) | |
| 4 | dedth3h.3 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁)) | |
| 5 | dedth3h.4 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝜁 | |
| 6 | 3, 4, 5 | dedth2h 4537 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏) |
| 7 | 2, 6 | dedth 4536 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) |
| 8 | 7 | 3impib 1128 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 208 ∧ wa 399 ∧ w3a 1097 = wceq 1559 ifcif 4477 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1814 ax-4 1828 ax-5 1929 ax-6 1986 ax-7 2027 ax-8 2143 ax-9 2151 ax-ext 2733 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 400 df-or 859 df-3an 1099 df-ex 1799 df-sb 2090 df-clab 2740 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2836 df-if 4478 |
| This theorem is referenced by: dedth3v 4541 faclbnd4lem2 14300 dvdsle 16334 gcdaddm 16549 ipdiri 30989 hvaddcan 31229 hvsubadd 31236 norm3dif 31309 omlsii 31562 chjass 31692 ledi 31699 spansncv 31812 pjcjt2 31851 pjopyth 31879 hoaddass 31941 hocsubdir 31944 hoddi 32149 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |