Theorem dedth3h 4525

Description: Weak deduction theorem eliminating three hypotheses. See comments in dedth2h 4524. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dedth3h.1	⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))
dedth3h.2	⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))
dedth3h.3	⊢ (𝐶 = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))
dedth3h.4	⊢ 𝜁

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dedth3h	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Proof of Theorem dedth3h

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dedth3h.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))
2	1	imbi2d 341	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏)))
3		dedth3h.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))
4		dedth3h.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))
5		dedth3h.4	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝜁
6	3, 4, 5	dedth2h 4524	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏)
7	2, 6	dedth 4523	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))
8	7	3impib 1116	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1539  ifcif 4465

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2106  ax-9 2114  ax-ext 2707

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 846  df-3an 1089  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2814  df-if 4466

This theorem is referenced by:  dedth3v  4528  faclbnd4lem2  14054  dvdsle  16064  gcdaddm  16277  ipdiri  29237  hvaddcan  29477  hvsubadd  29484  norm3dif  29557  omlsii  29810  chjass  29940  ledi  29947  spansncv  30060  pjcjt2  30099  pjopyth  30127  hoaddass  30189  hocsubdir  30192  hoddi  30397