Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > dedth3h | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Weak deduction theorem eliminating three hypotheses. See comments in dedth2h 4523. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
dedth3h.1 | ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) |
dedth3h.2 | ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) |
dedth3h.3 | ⊢ (𝐶 = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁)) |
dedth3h.4 | ⊢ 𝜁 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
dedth3h | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | dedth3h.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) | |
2 | 1 | imbi2d 340 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏))) |
3 | dedth3h.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) | |
4 | dedth3h.3 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁)) | |
5 | dedth3h.4 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝜁 | |
6 | 3, 4, 5 | dedth2h 4523 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏) |
7 | 2, 6 | dedth 4522 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) |
8 | 7 | 3impib 1114 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 395 ∧ w3a 1085 = wceq 1541 ifcif 4464 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1801 ax-4 1815 ax-5 1916 ax-6 1974 ax-7 2014 ax-8 2111 ax-9 2119 ax-ext 2710 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-or 844 df-3an 1087 df-ex 1786 df-sb 2071 df-clab 2717 df-cleq 2731 df-clel 2817 df-if 4465 |
This theorem is referenced by: dedth3v 4527 faclbnd4lem2 13989 dvdsle 16000 gcdaddm 16213 ipdiri 29171 hvaddcan 29411 hvsubadd 29418 norm3dif 29491 omlsii 29744 chjass 29874 ledi 29881 spansncv 29994 pjcjt2 30033 pjopyth 30061 hoaddass 30123 hocsubdir 30126 hoddi 30331 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |