| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > dedth3h | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Weak deduction theorem eliminating three hypotheses. See comments in dedth2h 4539. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| dedth3h.1 | ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) |
| dedth3h.2 | ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) |
| dedth3h.3 | ⊢ (𝐶 = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁)) |
| dedth3h.4 | ⊢ 𝜁 |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| dedth3h | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | dedth3h.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) | |
| 2 | 1 | imbi2d 340 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏))) |
| 3 | dedth3h.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) | |
| 4 | dedth3h.3 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁)) | |
| 5 | dedth3h.4 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝜁 | |
| 6 | 3, 4, 5 | dedth2h 4539 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏) |
| 7 | 2, 6 | dedth 4538 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) |
| 8 | 7 | 3impib 1116 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 ∧ w3a 1086 = wceq 1541 ifcif 4479 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1968 ax-7 2009 ax-8 2115 ax-9 2123 ax-ext 2708 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3an 1088 df-ex 1781 df-sb 2068 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2728 df-clel 2811 df-if 4480 |
| This theorem is referenced by: dedth3v 4543 faclbnd4lem2 14217 dvdsle 16237 gcdaddm 16452 ipdiri 30905 hvaddcan 31145 hvsubadd 31152 norm3dif 31225 omlsii 31478 chjass 31608 ledi 31615 spansncv 31728 pjcjt2 31767 pjopyth 31795 hoaddass 31857 hocsubdir 31860 hoddi 32065 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |