Theorem dedth3h 4546

Description: Weak deduction theorem eliminating three hypotheses. See comments in dedth2h 4545. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dedth3h.1	⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))
dedth3h.2	⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))
dedth3h.3	⊢ (𝐶 = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))
dedth3h.4	⊢ 𝜁

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dedth3h	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Proof of Theorem dedth3h

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dedth3h.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))
2	1	imbi2d 343	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏)))
3		dedth3h.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))
4		dedth3h.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))
5		dedth3h.4	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝜁
6	3, 4, 5	dedth2h 4545	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏)
7	2, 6	dedth 4544	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))
8	7	3impib 1134	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570  ifcif 4485

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-ext 2735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-if 4486

This theorem is used by:  dedth3v  4549  faclbnd4lem2  14468  dvdsle  16512  gcdaddm  16729  ipdiri  31465  hvaddcan  31705  hvsubadd  31712  norm3dif  31785  omlsii  32038  chjass  32168  ledi  32175  spansncv  32288  pjcjt2  32327  pjopyth  32355  hoaddass  32417  hocsubdir  32420  hoddi  32625