Theorem dfdmf 5910

Description: Definition of domain, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dfdmf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
dfdmf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfdmf	⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦}

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem dfdmf

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑣 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-dm 5699	. 2 ⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑣 𝑤𝐴𝑣}
2		nfcv 2903	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤
3		dfdmf.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
4		nfcv 2903	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑣
5	2, 3, 4	nfbr 5195	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑣
6		nfv 1912	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑣 𝑤𝐴𝑦
7		breq2 5152	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑦 → (𝑤𝐴𝑣 ↔ 𝑤𝐴𝑦))
8	5, 6, 7	cbvexv1 2343	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑣 𝑤𝐴𝑣 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦)
9	8	abbii 2807	. 2 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑣 𝑤𝐴𝑣} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦}
10		nfcv 2903	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑤
11		dfdmf.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
12		nfcv 2903	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦
13	10, 11, 12	nfbr 5195	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤𝐴𝑦
14	13	nfex 2323	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦
15		nfv 1912	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦
16		breq1 5151	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (𝑤𝐴𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
17	16	exbidv 1919	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
18	14, 15, 17	cbvabw 2811	. 2 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦}
19	1, 9, 18	3eqtri 2767	1 ⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦}

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1776  {cab 2712  Ⅎwnfc 2888   class class class wbr 5148  dom cdm 5689

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2706

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2063  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2890  df-rab 3434  df-v 3480  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-ss 3980  df-nul 4340  df-if 4532  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634  df-op 4638  df-br 5149  df-dm 5699

This theorem is referenced by:  dmopab  5929