Theorem dfdmf 5765

Description: Definition of domain, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dfdmf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
dfdmf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfdmf	⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦}

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem dfdmf

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑣 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-dm 5565	. 2 ⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑣 𝑤𝐴𝑣}
2		nfcv 2977	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤
3		dfdmf.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
4		nfcv 2977	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑣
5	2, 3, 4	nfbr 5113	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑣
6		nfv 1915	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑣 𝑤𝐴𝑦
7		breq2 5070	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑦 → (𝑤𝐴𝑣 ↔ 𝑤𝐴𝑦))
8	5, 6, 7	cbvexv1 2362	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑣 𝑤𝐴𝑣 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦)
9	8	abbii 2886	. 2 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑣 𝑤𝐴𝑣} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦}
10		nfcv 2977	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑤
11		dfdmf.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
12		nfcv 2977	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦
13	10, 11, 12	nfbr 5113	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤𝐴𝑦
14	13	nfex 2343	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦
15		nfv 1915	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦
16		breq1 5069	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (𝑤𝐴𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
17	16	exbidv 1922	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
18	14, 15, 17	cbvabw 2890	. 2 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦}
19	1, 9, 18	3eqtri 2848	1 ⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦}

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1780  {cab 2799  Ⅎwnfc 2961   class class class wbr 5066  dom cdm 5555

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-dif 3939  df-un 3941  df-in 3943  df-ss 3952  df-nul 4292  df-if 4468  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-br 5067  df-dm 5565

This theorem is referenced by:  dmopab  5784