Theorem dfdmf 5612

Description: Definition of domain, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dfdmf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
dfdmf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfdmf	⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦}

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem dfdmf

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑣 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-dm 5414	. 2 ⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑣 𝑤𝐴𝑣}
2		nfcv 2927	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤
3		dfdmf.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
4		nfcv 2927	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑣
5	2, 3, 4	nfbr 4973	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑣
6		nfv 1874	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑣 𝑤𝐴𝑦
7		breq2 4930	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑦 → (𝑤𝐴𝑣 ↔ 𝑤𝐴𝑦))
8	5, 6, 7	cbvexv1 2279	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑣 𝑤𝐴𝑣 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦)
9	8	abbii 2839	. 2 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑣 𝑤𝐴𝑣} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦}
10		nfcv 2927	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑤
11		dfdmf.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
12		nfcv 2927	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦
13	10, 11, 12	nfbr 4973	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤𝐴𝑦
14	13	nfex 2265	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦
15		nfv 1874	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦
16		breq1 4929	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (𝑤𝐴𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
17	16	exbidv 1881	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
18	14, 15, 17	cbvab 2906	. 2 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦}
19	1, 9, 18	3eqtri 2801	1 ⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦}

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1508  ∃wex 1743  {cab 2753  Ⅎwnfc 2911   class class class wbr 4926  dom cdm 5404

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1759  ax-4 1773  ax-5 1870  ax-6 1929  ax-7 1966  ax-8 2053  ax-9 2060  ax-10 2080  ax-11 2094  ax-12 2107  ax-13 2302  ax-ext 2745

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 388  df-or 835  df-3an 1071  df-tru 1511  df-ex 1744  df-nf 1748  df-sb 2017  df-clab 2754  df-cleq 2766  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2913  df-rab 3092  df-v 3412  df-dif 3827  df-un 3829  df-in 3831  df-ss 3838  df-nul 4174  df-if 4346  df-sn 4437  df-pr 4439  df-op 4443  df-br 4927  df-dm 5414

This theorem is referenced by:  dmopab  5631