| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 59 of 503) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31014) |
(31015-32537) |
(32538-50296) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | ideq 5801 | For sets, the identity relation is the same as equality. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ididg 5802 | A set is identical to itself. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 I 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | issetid 5803 | Two ways of expressing set existence. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 I 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | coss1 5804 | Subclass theorem for composition. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | coss2 5805 | Subclass theorem for composition. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∘ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∘ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | coeq1 5806 | Equality theorem for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | coeq2 5807 | Equality theorem for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∘ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∘ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | coeq1i 5808 | Equality inference for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2000.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | coeq2i 5809 | Equality inference for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2000.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∘ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∘ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | coeq1d 5810 | Equality deduction for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2000.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | coeq2d 5811 | Equality deduction for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2000.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∘ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∘ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | coeq12i 5812 | Equality inference for composition of two classes. (Contributed by FL, 7-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | coeq12d 5813 | Equality deduction for composition of two classes. (Contributed by FL, 7-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | nfco 5814 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for function value. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | brcog 5815* | Ordered pair membership in a composition. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(𝐶 ∘ 𝐷)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝐷𝑥 ∧ 𝑥𝐶𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | opelco2g 5816* | Ordered pair membership in a composition. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ (𝐶 ∘ 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥(〈𝐴, 𝑥〉 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | brcogw 5817 | Ordered pair membership in a composition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝐴𝐷𝑋 ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝐵)) → 𝐴(𝐶 ∘ 𝐷)𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | eqbrrdva 5818* | Deduction from extensionality principle for relations, given an equivalence only on the relation domain and range. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Nov-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 × 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐶 × 𝐷)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝐵𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | brco 5819* | Binary relation on a composition. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴(𝐶 ∘ 𝐷)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝐷𝑥 ∧ 𝑥𝐶𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | opelco 5820* | Ordered pair membership in a composition. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ (𝐶 ∘ 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝐷𝑥 ∧ 𝑥𝐶𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvss 5821 | Subset theorem for converse. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Kyle Wyonch, 27-Apr-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ◡𝐴 ⊆ ◡𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cnveq 5822 | Equality theorem for converse relation. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ◡𝐴 = ◡𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cnveqi 5823 | Equality inference for converse relation. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ◡𝐴 = ◡𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | cnveqd 5824 | Equality deduction for converse relation. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐴 = ◡𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | elcnv 5825* | Membership in a converse relation. Equation 5 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ◡𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | elcnv2 5826* | Membership in a converse relation. Equation 5 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ◡𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 ∈ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | nfcnv 5827 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for converse relation. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥◡𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | brcnvg 5828 | The converse of a binary relation swaps arguments. Theorem 11 of [Suppes] p. 61. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | opelcnvg 5829 | Ordered-pair membership in converse relation. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ ◡𝑅 ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉 ∈ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | opelcnv 5830 | Ordered-pair membership in converse relation. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ ◡𝑅 ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉 ∈ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | brcnv 5831 | The converse of a binary relation swaps arguments. Theorem 11 of [Suppes] p. 61. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | csbcnv 5832 | Move class substitution in and out of the converse of a relation. Version of csbcnvgALT 5833 without a sethood antecedent but depending on more axioms. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Feb-2017.) (Revised by NM, 23-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ◡⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌◡𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | csbcnvgALT 5833 | Move class substitution in and out of the converse of a relation. Version of csbcnv 5832 with a sethood antecedent but depending on fewer axioms. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Feb-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ◡⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌◡𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | cnvco 5834 | Distributive law of converse over class composition. Theorem 26 of [Suppes] p. 64. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (◡𝐵 ∘ ◡𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | cnvuni 5835* | The converse of a class union is the (indexed) union of the converses of its members. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ ◡∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ◡𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | dfdm3 5836* | Alternate definition of domain. Definition 6.5(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.) |
| ⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | dfrn2 5837* | Alternate definition of range. Definition 4 of [Suppes] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) |
| ⊢ ran 𝐴 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑥𝐴𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | dfrn3 5838* | Alternate definition of range. Definition 6.5(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.) |
| ⊢ ran 𝐴 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | elrn2g 5839* | Membership in a range. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥〈𝑥, 𝐴〉 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elrng 5840* | Membership in a range. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | elrn2 5841* | Membership in a range. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jul-1994.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥〈𝑥, 𝐴〉 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | elrn 5842* | Membership in a range. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ssrelrn 5843* | If a relation is a subset of a cartesian product, then for each element of the range of the relation there is an element of the first set of the cartesian product which is related to the element of the range by the relation. (Contributed by AV, 24-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ran 𝑅) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎𝑅𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | dfdm4 5844 | Alternate definition of domain. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.) |
| ⊢ dom 𝐴 = ran ◡𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | dfdmf 5845* | Definition of domain, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | csbdm 5846 | Distribute proper substitution through the domain of a class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.) (Revised by NM, 24-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌dom 𝐵 = dom ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | eldmg 5847* | Domain membership. Theorem 4 of [Suppes] p. 59. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝐴𝐵𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | eldm2g 5848* | Domain membership. Theorem 4 of [Suppes] p. 59. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦〈𝐴, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | eldm 5849* | Membership in a domain. Theorem 4 of [Suppes] p. 59. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝐴𝐵𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | eldm2 5850* | Membership in a domain. Theorem 4 of [Suppes] p. 59. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦〈𝐴, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmss 5851 | Subset theorem for domain. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → dom 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmeq 5852 | Equality theorem for domain. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → dom 𝐴 = dom 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmeqi 5853 | Equality inference for domain. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ dom 𝐴 = dom 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | dmeqd 5854 | Equality deduction for domain. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐴 = dom 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | opeldmd 5855 | Membership of first of an ordered pair in a domain. Deduction version of opeldm 5856. (Contributed by AV, 11-Mar-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | opeldm 5856 | Membership of first of an ordered pair in a domain. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | breldm 5857 | Membership of first of a binary relation in a domain. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | breldmg 5858 | Membership of first of a binary relation in a domain. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | dmun 5859 | The domain of a union is the union of domains. Exercise 56(a) of [Enderton] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (dom 𝐴 ∪ dom 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmin 5860 | The domain of an intersection is included in the intersection of the domains. Theorem 6 of [Suppes] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (dom 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | breldmd 5861 | Membership of first of a binary relation in a domain. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | dmiun 5862 | The domain of an indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ dom ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 dom 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | dmuni 5863* | The domain of a union. Part of Exercise 8 of [Enderton] p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2004.) |
| ⊢ dom ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 dom 𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | dmopab 5864* | The domain of a class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ dom {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | dmopabelb 5865* | A set is an element of the domain of an ordered pair class abstraction iff there is a second set so that both sets fulfil the wff of the class abstraction. (Contributed by AV, 19-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ dom {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | dmopab2rex 5866* | The domain of an ordered pair class abstraction with two nested restricted existential quantifiers. (Contributed by AV, 23-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑈 (∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) → dom {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑈 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐷))} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑈 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 𝑥 = 𝐶)}) | ||
| Theorem | dmopabss 5867* | Upper bound for the domain of a restricted class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jan-2004.) |
| ⊢ dom {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | dmopab3 5868* | The domain of a restricted class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jan-2004.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ dom {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | dm0 5869 | The domain of the empty set is empty. Part of Theorem 3.8(v) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ dom ∅ = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | dmi 5870 | The domain of the identity relation is the universe. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ dom I = V | ||
| Theorem | dmv 5871 | The domain of the universe is the universe. (Contributed by NM, 8-Aug-2003.) |
| ⊢ dom V = V | ||
| Theorem | dmep 5872 | The domain of the membership relation is the universal class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 26-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ dom E = V | ||
| Theorem | dm0rn0 5873 | An empty domain is equivalent to an empty range. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1998.) Avoid ax-10 2152, ax-11 2168, ax-12 2189. (Revised by TM, 24-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ (dom 𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ran 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | dm0rn0OLD 5874 | Obsolete version of dm0rn0 5873 as of 24-Jan-2026. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1998.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (dom 𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ran 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | rn0 5875 | The range of the empty set is empty. Part of Theorem 3.8(v) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.) |
| ⊢ ran ∅ = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | rnep 5876 | The range of the membership relation is the universal class minus the empty set. (Contributed by BJ, 26-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ran E = (V ∖ {∅}) | ||
| Theorem | reldm0 5877 | A relation is empty iff its domain is empty. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ dom 𝐴 = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | dmxp 5878 | The domain of a Cartesian product. Part of Theorem 3.13(x) of [Monk1] p. 37. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-10 2152, ax-11 2168, ax-12 2189. (Revised by SN, 12-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → dom (𝐴 × 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | dmxpid 5879 | The domain of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-1995.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 × 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | dmxpin 5880 | The domain of the intersection of two Cartesian squares. Unlike in dmin 5860, equality holds. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2008.) |
| ⊢ dom ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | xpid11 5881 | The Cartesian square is a one-to-one construction. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) = (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmcnvcnv 5882 | The domain of the double converse of a class is equal to its domain (even when that class in not a relation, in which case dfrel2 6147 gives another proof). (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2007.) |
| ⊢ dom ◡◡𝐴 = dom 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | rncnvcnv 5883 | The range of the double converse of a class is equal to its range (even when that class in not a relation). (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2007.) |
| ⊢ ran ◡◡𝐴 = ran 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | elreldm 5884 | The first member of an ordered pair in a relation belongs to the domain of the relation (see op1stb 5418). (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ∩ ∩ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | rneq 5885 | Equality theorem for range. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ran 𝐴 = ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rneqi 5886 | Equality inference for range. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝐴 = ran 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | rneqd 5887 | Equality deduction for range. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐴 = ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rnss 5888 | Subset theorem for range. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ran 𝐴 ⊆ ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rnssi 5889 | Subclass inference for range. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝐴 ⊆ ran 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | brelrng 5890 | The second argument of a binary relation belongs to its range. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴𝐶𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | brelrn 5891 | The second argument of a binary relation belongs to its range. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴𝐶𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | opelrn 5892 | Membership of second member of an ordered pair in a range. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1997.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | releldm 5893 | The first argument of a binary relation belongs to its domain. Note that 𝐴𝑅𝐵 does not imply Rel 𝑅: see for example nrelv 5750 and brv 5419. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relelrn 5894 | The second argument of a binary relation belongs to its range. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | releldmb 5895* | Membership in a domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝐴𝑅𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | relelrnb 5896* | Membership in a range. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥𝑅𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | releldmi 5897 | The first argument of a binary relation belongs to its domain. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ Rel 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relelrni 5898 | The second argument of a binary relation belongs to its range. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ Rel 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | dfrnf 5899* | Definition of range, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝐴 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑥𝐴𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | nfdm 5900 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for domain. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥dom 𝐴 | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |