Theorem n0lpligALT 30802

Description: Alternate version of n0lplig 30801 using the predicate ∉ instead of ¬ ∈ and whose proof bypasses nsnlplig 30799. (Contributed by AV, 28-Nov-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
n0lpligALT	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)

Proof of Theorem n0lpligALT

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2761	. . . 4 ⊢ ∪ 𝐺 = ∪ 𝐺
2	1	l2p 30797	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐺) → ∃𝑎 ∈ ∪ 𝐺∃𝑏 ∈ ∪ 𝐺(𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ∅))
3		noel 4290	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ¬ 𝑎 ∈ ∅
4	3	pm2.21i 120	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ∅ → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)
5	4	3ad2ant2 1150	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ∅) → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)
6	5	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ ∪ 𝐺 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ∪ 𝐺) → ((𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ∅) → ∅ ∉ 𝐺))
7	6	rexlimivv 3205	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ ∪ 𝐺∃𝑏 ∈ ∪ 𝐺(𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ∅) → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)
8	2, 7	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐺) → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)
9		simpr 489	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ ∅ ∉ 𝐺) → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)
10	8, 9	pm2.61danel 3076	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1101   ∈ wcel 2141   ≠ wne 2956   ∉ wnel 3062  ∃wrex 3087  ∅c0 4285  ∪ cuni 4871  Pligcplig 30792

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1823  ax-4 1837  ax-5 1938  ax-6 1995  ax-7 2036  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-ext 2733

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1571  df-fal 1581  df-ex 1808  df-sb 2095  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nel 3063  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rmo 3367  df-reu 3368  df-v 3455  df-dif 3907  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-uni 4872  df-plig 30793

This theorem is referenced by: (None)