Theorem n0lpligALT 30689

Description: Alternate version of n0lplig 30688 using the predicate ∉ instead of ¬ ∈ and whose proof bypasses nsnlplig 30686. (Contributed by AV, 28-Nov-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
n0lpligALT	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)

Proof of Theorem n0lpligALT

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2764	. . . 4 ⊢ ∪ 𝐺 = ∪ 𝐺
2	1	l2p 30684	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐺) → ∃𝑎 ∈ ∪ 𝐺∃𝑏 ∈ ∪ 𝐺(𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ∅))
3		noel 4292	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ¬ 𝑎 ∈ ∅
4	3	pm2.21i 119	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ∅ → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)
5	4	3ad2ant2 1148	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ∅) → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)
6	5	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ ∪ 𝐺 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ∪ 𝐺) → ((𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ∅) → ∅ ∉ 𝐺))
7	6	rexlimivv 3206	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ ∪ 𝐺∃𝑏 ∈ ∪ 𝐺(𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ∅) → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)
8	2, 7	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐺) → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)
9		simpr 488	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ ∅ ∉ 𝐺) → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)
10	8, 9	pm2.61danel 3077	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   ∧ w3a 1099   ∈ wcel 2144   ≠ wne 2959   ∉ wnel 3063  ∃wrex 3088  ∅c0 4287  ∪ cuni 4867  Pligcplig 30679

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1817  ax-4 1831  ax-5 1932  ax-6 1989  ax-7 2030  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2736

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1565  df-fal 1575  df-ex 1802  df-sb 2093  df-mo 2568  df-eu 2598  df-clab 2743  df-cleq 2756  df-clel 2839  df-nel 3064  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-v 3458  df-dif 3909  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-uni 4868  df-plig 30680

This theorem is referenced by: (None)