Theorem n0lpligALT 27894

Description: Alternate version of n0lplig 27893 using the predicate ∉ instead of ¬ ∈ and whose proof bypasses nsnlplig 27891. (Contributed by AV, 28-Nov-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
n0lpligALT	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)

Proof of Theorem n0lpligALT

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2825	. . . 4 ⊢ ∪ 𝐺 = ∪ 𝐺
2	1	l2p 27889	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐺) → ∃𝑎 ∈ ∪ 𝐺∃𝑏 ∈ ∪ 𝐺(𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ∅))
3		noel 4148	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ¬ 𝑎 ∈ ∅
4	3	pm2.21i 117	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ∅ → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)
5	4	3ad2ant2 1170	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ∅) → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)
6	5	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ ∪ 𝐺 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ∪ 𝐺) → ((𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ∅) → ∅ ∉ 𝐺))
7	6	rexlimivv 3246	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ ∪ 𝐺∃𝑏 ∈ ∪ 𝐺(𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ∅) → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)
8	2, 7	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐺) → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)
9		simpr 479	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ ∅ ∉ 𝐺) → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)
10	8, 9	pm2.61danel 3116	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 386   ∧ w3a 1113   ∈ wcel 2166   ≠ wne 2999   ∉ wnel 3102  ∃wrex 3118  ∅c0 4144  ∪ cuni 4658  Pligcplig 27884

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1896  ax-4 1910  ax-5 2011  ax-6 2077  ax-7 2114  ax-9 2175  ax-10 2194  ax-11 2209  ax-12 2222  ax-ext 2803

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-or 881  df-3an 1115  df-tru 1662  df-ex 1881  df-nf 1885  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2605  df-eu 2640  df-clab 2812  df-cleq 2818  df-clel 2821  df-nfc 2958  df-nel 3103  df-ral 3122  df-rex 3123  df-reu 3124  df-v 3416  df-dif 3801  df-nul 4145  df-uni 4659  df-plig 27885

This theorem is referenced by: (None)