P. 301 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 30001-30100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	2wlkdlem8 30001	Lemma 8 for 2wlkd 30004. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘0) = 𝐽 ∧ (𝐹‘1) = 𝐾))
Theorem	2wlkdlem9 30002	Lemma 9 for 2wlkd 30004. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1))))
Theorem	2wlkdlem10 30003*	Lemma 10 for 3wlkd 30240. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))
Theorem	2wlkd 30004	Construction of a walk from two given edges in a graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 23-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	2wlkond 30005	A walk of length 2 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑃)
Theorem	2trld 30006	Construction of a trail from two given edges in a graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 24-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	2trlond 30007	A trail of length 2 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑃)
Theorem	2pthd 30008	A path of length 2 from one vertex to another vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 24-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	2spthd 30009	A simple path of length 2 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	2pthond 30010	A simple path of length 2 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 24-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑃)
Theorem	2pthon3v 30011*	For a vertex adjacent to two other vertices there is a simple path of length 2 between these other vertices in a hypergraph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 24-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸)) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2))
Theorem	umgr2adedgwlklem 30012	Lemma for umgr2adedgwlk 30013, umgr2adedgspth 30016, etc. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸) → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))))
Theorem	umgr2adedgwlk 30013	In a multigraph, two adjacent edges form a walk of length 2. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴, 𝐵})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐾) = {𝐵, 𝐶})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2 ∧ (𝐴 = (𝑃‘0) ∧ 𝐵 = (𝑃‘1) ∧ 𝐶 = (𝑃‘2))))
Theorem	umgr2adedgwlkon 30014	In a multigraph, two adjacent edges form a walk between two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴, 𝐵})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐾) = {𝐵, 𝐶})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑃)
Theorem	umgr2adedgwlkonALT 30015	Alternate proof for umgr2adedgwlkon 30014, using umgr2adedgwlk 30013, but with a much longer proof! In a multigraph, two adjacent edges form a walk between two (different) vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴, 𝐵})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐾) = {𝐵, 𝐶})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑃)
Theorem	umgr2adedgspth 30016	In a multigraph, two adjacent edges with different endvertices form a simple path of length 2. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴, 𝐵})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐾) = {𝐵, 𝐶})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	umgr2wlk 30017*	In a multigraph, there is a walk of length 2 for each pair of adjacent edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2 ∧ (𝐴 = (𝑝‘0) ∧ 𝐵 = (𝑝‘1) ∧ 𝐶 = (𝑝‘2))))
Theorem	umgr2wlkon 30018*	For each pair of adjacent edges in a multigraph, there is a walk of length 2 between the not common vertices of the edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑝)
Theorem	elwwlks2s3 30019*	A walk of length 2 as word is a length 3 string. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (2 WWalksN 𝐺) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 𝑊 = ⟨“𝑎𝑏𝑐”⟩)
Theorem	midwwlks2s3 30020*	There is a vertex between the endpoints of a walk of length 2 between two vertices as length 3 string. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (2 WWalksN 𝐺) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊‘1) = 𝑏)
Theorem	wwlks2onv 30021	If a length 3 string represents a walk of length 2, its components are vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Feb-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))
Theorem	elwwlks2ons3im 30022	A walk as word of length 2 between two vertices is a length 3 string and its second symbol is a vertex. (Contributed by AV, 14-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) → (𝑊 = ⟨“𝐴(𝑊‘1)𝐶”⟩ ∧ (𝑊‘1) ∈ 𝑉))
Theorem	elwwlks2ons3 30023*	For each walk of length 2 between two vertices, there is a third vertex in the middle of the walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 14-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊 = ⟨“𝐴𝑏𝐶”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐴𝑏𝐶”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶)))
Theorem	s3wwlks2on 30024*	A length 3 string which represents a walk of length 2 between two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2)))
Theorem	sps3wwlks2on 30025*	A length 3 string which represents a walk of length 2 between two vertices. Concerns simple pseudographs, in contrast to s3wwlks2on 30024 and does not require the Axiom of Choice for its proof. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 28-Jan-2026.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2)))
Theorem	usgrwwlks2on 30026	A walk of length 2 between two vertices as word in a simple graph. This theorem is analogous to umgrwwlks2on 30027 except it talks about simple graphs and therefore does not require the Axiom of Choice for its proof. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 29-Jan-2026.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	umgrwwlks2on 30027	A walk of length 2 between two vertices as word in a multigraph. This theorem would also hold for pseudographs, but to prove this the cases 𝐴 = 𝐵 and/or 𝐵 = 𝐶 must be considered separately. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	wwlks2onsym 30028	There is a walk of length 2 from one vertex to another vertex iff there is a walk of length 2 from the other vertex to the first vertex. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ⟨“𝐶𝐵𝐴”⟩ ∈ (𝐶(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐴)))
Theorem	elwwlks2on 30029*	A walk of length 2 between two vertices as length 3 string. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊 = ⟨“𝐴𝑏𝐶”⟩ ∧ ∃𝑓(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑊 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2))))
Theorem	elwspths2on 30030*	A simple path of length 2 between two vertices (in a graph) as length 3 string. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊 = ⟨“𝐴𝑏𝐶”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐴𝑏𝐶”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐶))))
Theorem	elwspths2onw 30031*	A simple path of length 2 between two vertices (in a simple pseudograph) as length 3 string. This theorem avoids the Axiom of Choice for its proof, at the cost of requiring a simple graph; the more general version is elwspths2on 30030. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 29-Jan-2026.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊 = ⟨“𝐴𝑏𝐶”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐴𝑏𝐶”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐶))))
Theorem	wpthswwlks2on 30032	For two different vertices, a walk of length 2 between these vertices is a simple path of length 2 between these vertices in a simple graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Mar-2022.) (Revised by Ender Ting, 29-Jan-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐵) = (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐵))
Theorem	2wspdisj 30033*	All simple paths of length 2 from a fixed vertex to another vertex are disjunct. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Disj 𝑏 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝐴})(𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝑏)
Theorem	2wspiundisj 30034*	All simple paths of length 2 from a fixed vertex to another vertex are disjunct. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 14-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Disj 𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∪ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑎})(𝑎(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝑏)
Theorem	usgr2wspthons3 30035	A simple path of length 2 between two vertices represented as length 3 string corresponds to two adjacent edges in a simple graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Mar-2022.) (Revised by Ender Ting, 29-Jan-2026.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	usgr2wspthon 30036*	A simple path of length 2 between two vertices corresponds to two adjacent edges in a simple graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-May-2021.) (Revised by Ender Ting, 29-Jan-2026.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑇 ∈ (𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ((𝑇 = ⟨“𝐴𝑏𝐶”⟩ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ ({𝐴, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸))))
Theorem	elwwlks2 30037*	A walk of length 2 between two vertices as length 3 string in a pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝑊 ∈ (2 WWalksN 𝐺) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊 = ⟨“𝑎𝑏𝑐”⟩ ∧ ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2 ∧ (𝑎 = (𝑝‘0) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝑝‘1) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝑝‘2))))))
Theorem	elwspths2spth 30038*	A simple path of length 2 between two vertices as length 3 string in a pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 28-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝑊 ∈ (2 WSPathsN 𝐺) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊 = ⟨“𝑎𝑏𝑐”⟩ ∧ ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2 ∧ (𝑎 = (𝑝‘0) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝑝‘1) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝑝‘2))))))
17.3.9  Walks in regular graphs
Theorem	rusgrnumwwlkl1 30039*	In a k-regular graph, there are k walks (as word) of length 1 starting at each vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 28-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉) → (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (1 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑃}) = 𝐾)
Theorem	rusgrnumwwlkslem 30040*	Lemma for rusgrnumwwlks 30045. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Aug-2018.)
⊢ (𝑌 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑍 ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑃} → {𝑤 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} = {𝑤 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ (𝑌‘0) = 𝑃 ∧ 𝜓)})
Theorem	rusgrnumwwlklem 30041*	Lemma for rusgrnumwwlk 30046 etc. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑃𝐿𝑁) = (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑃}))
Theorem	rusgrnumwwlkb0 30042*	Induction base 0 for rusgrnumwwlk 30046. Here, we do not need the regularity of the graph yet. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑃𝐿0) = 1)
Theorem	rusgrnumwwlkb1 30043*	Induction base 1 for rusgrnumwwlk 30046. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 28-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑃𝐿1) = 𝐾)
Theorem	rusgr0edg 30044*	Special case for graphs without edges: There are no walks of length greater than 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 0 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑃𝐿𝑁) = 0)
Theorem	rusgrnumwwlks 30045*	Induction step for rusgrnumwwlk 30046. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-May-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → ((𝑃𝐿𝑁) = (𝐾↑𝑁) → (𝑃𝐿(𝑁 + 1)) = (𝐾↑(𝑁 + 1))))
Theorem	rusgrnumwwlk 30046*	In a 𝐾-regular graph, the number of walks of a fixed length 𝑁 from a fixed vertex is 𝐾 to the power of 𝑁. By definition, (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) is the set of walks (as words) with length 𝑁, and (𝑃𝐿𝑁) is the number of walks with length 𝑁 starting at the vertex 𝑃. Because of the 𝐾-regularity, a walk can be continued in 𝐾 different ways at the end vertex of the walk, and this repeated 𝑁 times. This theorem even holds for 𝑁 = 0: in this case, the walk consists of only one vertex 𝑃, so the number of walks of length 𝑁 = 0 starting with 𝑃 is (𝐾↑0) = 1. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → (𝑃𝐿𝑁) = (𝐾↑𝑁))
Theorem	rusgrnumwwlkg 30047*	In a 𝐾-regular graph, the number of walks (as words) of a fixed length 𝑁 from a fixed vertex is 𝐾 to the power of 𝑁. Closed form of rusgrnumwwlk 30046. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑃}) = (𝐾↑𝑁))
Theorem	rusgrnumwlkg 30048*	In a k-regular graph, the number of walks of a fixed length n from a fixed vertex is k to the power of n. This theorem corresponds to statement 11 in [Huneke] p. 2: "The total number of walks v(0) v(1) ... v(n-2) from a fixed vertex v = v(0) is k^(n-2) as G is k-regular." This theorem even holds for n=0: then the walk consists of only one vertex v(0), so the number of walks of length n=0 starting with v=v(0) is 1=k^0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-Aug-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑃)}) = (𝐾↑𝑁))
Theorem	clwwlknclwwlkdif 30049*	The set 𝐴 of walks of length 𝑁 starting with a fixed vertex 𝑉 and ending not at this vertex is the difference between the set 𝐶 of walks of length 𝑁 starting with this vertex 𝑋 and the set 𝐵 of closed walks of length 𝑁 anchored at this vertex 𝑋. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 16-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ (lastS‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑋)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑋(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑋}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵)
Theorem	clwwlknclwwlkdifnum 30050*	In a 𝐾-regular graph, the size of the set 𝐴 of walks of length 𝑁 starting with a fixed vertex 𝑋 and ending not at this vertex is the difference between 𝐾 to the power of 𝑁 and the size of the set 𝐵 of closed walks of length 𝑁 anchored at this vertex 𝑋. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 8-Mar-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ (lastS‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑋)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑋(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ Fin) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → (♯‘𝐴) = ((𝐾↑𝑁) − (♯‘𝐵)))
17.3.10  Closed walks as words In general, a closed walk is an alternating sequence of vertices and edges, as defined in df-clwlks 29839: p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n), with p(n) = p(0). Often, it is sufficient to refer to a walk by the (cyclic) sequence of its vertices, i.e omitting its edges in its representation: p(0) p(1) ... p(n-1) p(0), see the corresponding remark on cycles (which are special closed walks) in [Diestel] p. 7. As for "walks as words" in general, the concept of a Word, see df-word 14476, is also used in Definitions df-clwwlk 30052 and df-clwwlkn 30095, and the representation of a closed walk as the sequence of its vertices is called "closed walk as word". In contrast to "walks as words", the terminating vertex p(n) of a closed walk is omitted in the representation of a closed walk as word, see definitions df-clwwlk 30052, df-clwwlkn 30095 and df-clwwlknon 30158, because it is always equal to the first vertex of the closed walk. This representation has the advantage that the vertices can be cyclically shifted without changing the represented closed walk. Furthermore, the length of a closed walk (i.e. the number of its edges) equals the number of symbols/vertices of the word representing the closed walk. To avoid to handle the degenerate case of representing a (closed) walk of length 0 by the empty word, this case is excluded within the definition (𝑤 ≠ ∅). This is because a walk of length 0 is anchored at an arbitrary vertex by the general definition for closed walks, see 0clwlkv 30201, which neither can be reflected by the empty word nor by a singleton word ⟨“𝑣”⟩ with vertex v : ⟨“𝑣”⟩ represents the walk "𝑣𝑣", which is a (closed) walk of length 1 (if there is an edge/loop from 𝑣 to 𝑣), see loopclwwlkn1b 30112. Therefore, a closed walk corresponds to a closed walk as word only for walks of length at least 1, see clwlkclwwlk2 30073 or clwlkclwwlken 30082. Although the set ClWWalksN of all closed walks of a fixed length as words over the set of vertices is defined as function over ℕ0, the fixed length is usually not 0, because (0 ClWWalksN 𝐺) = ∅ (see clwwlkn0 30098). Analogous to (𝐴(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐵), the set of walks of a fixed length 𝑁 between two vertices 𝐴 and 𝐵, the set (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) of closed walks of a fixed length 𝑁 anchored at a fixed vertex 𝑋 is defined by df-clwwlknon 30158. This definition is also based on ℕ0 instead of ℕ, with (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)0) = ∅ (see clwwlk0on0 30162). clwwlknon1le1 30171 states that there is at most one (closed) walk of length 1 on a vertex, which would consist of a loop (see clwwlknon1loop 30168). And in a 𝐾-regular graph, there are 𝐾 closed walks of length 2 on each vertex, see clwwlknon2num 30175.
17.3.10.1  Closed walks as words
Syntax	cclwwlk 30051	Extend class notation with closed walks (in an undirected graph) as word over the set of vertices.
class ClWWalks
Definition	df-clwwlk 30052*	Define the set of all closed walks (in an undirected graph) as words over the set of vertices. Such a word corresponds to the sequence p(0) p(1) ... p(n-1) of the vertices in a closed walk p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n)=p(0) as defined in df-clwlks 29839. Notice that the word does not contain the terminating vertex p(n) of the walk, because it is always equal to the first vertex of the closed walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ClWWalks = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ Word (Vtx‘𝑔) ∣ (𝑤 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑤) − 1)){(𝑤‘𝑖), (𝑤‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ (Edg‘𝑔) ∧ {(lastS‘𝑤), (𝑤‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝑔))})
Theorem	clwwlk 30053*	The set of closed walks (in an undirected graph) as words over the set of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ (𝑤 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑤) − 1)){(𝑤‘𝑖), (𝑤‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {(lastS‘𝑤), (𝑤‘0)} ∈ 𝐸)}
Theorem	isclwwlk 30054*	Properties of a word to represent a closed walk (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ↔ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ≠ ∅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑊) − 1)){(𝑊‘𝑖), (𝑊‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {(lastS‘𝑊), (𝑊‘0)} ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	clwwlkbp 30055	Basic properties of a closed walk (in an undirected graph) as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	clwwlkgt0 30056	There is no empty closed walk (i.e. a closed walk without any edge) represented by a word of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) → 0 < (♯‘𝑊))
Theorem	clwwlksswrd 30057	Closed walks (represented by words) are words. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 25-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ⊆ Word (Vtx‘𝐺)
Theorem	clwwlk1loop 30058	A closed walk of length 1 is a loop. See also clwlkl1loop 29851. (Contributed by AV, 24-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ (♯‘𝑊) = 1) → {(𝑊‘0), (𝑊‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwwlkccatlem 30059*	Lemma for clwwlkccat 30060: index 𝑗 is shifted up by (♯‘𝐴), and the case 𝑖 = ((♯‘𝐴) − 1) is covered by the "bridge" {(lastS‘𝐴), (𝐵‘0)} = {(lastS‘𝐴), (𝐴‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺). (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2022.)
⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ Word (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝐴) − 1)){(𝐴‘𝑖), (𝐴‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺) ∧ {(lastS‘𝐴), (𝐴‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)) ∧ ((𝐵 ∈ Word (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝐵) − 1)){(𝐵‘𝑗), (𝐵‘(𝑗 + 1))} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺) ∧ {(lastS‘𝐵), (𝐵‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)) ∧ (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0)) → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘(𝐴 ++ 𝐵)) − 1)){((𝐴 ++ 𝐵)‘𝑖), ((𝐴 ++ 𝐵)‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwwlkccat 30060	The concatenation of two words representing closed walks anchored at the same vertex represents a closed walk. The resulting walk is a "double loop", starting at the common vertex, coming back to the common vertex by the first walk, following the second walk and finally coming back to the common vertex again. (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0)) → (𝐴 ++ 𝐵) ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	umgrclwwlkge2 30061	A closed walk in a multigraph has a length of at least 2 (because it cannot have a loop). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 16-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UMGraph → (𝑃 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) → 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem2a1 30062*	Lemma 1 for clwlkclwwlklem2a 30068. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((((♯‘𝑃) − 1) − 0) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 ∧ {(𝑃‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)), (𝑃‘0)} ∈ ran 𝐸)) → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem2a2 30063*	Lemma 2 for clwlkclwwlklem2a 30068. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jun-2018.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)})))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (♯‘𝐹) = ((♯‘𝑃) − 1))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem2a3 30064*	Lemma 3 for clwlkclwwlklem2a 30068. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jun-2018.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)})))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)) = (lastS‘𝑃))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem2fv1 30065*	Lemma 4a for clwlkclwwlklem2a 30068. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)})))    ⇒   ⊢ (((♯‘𝑃) ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 2))) → (𝐹‘𝐼) = (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝐼), (𝑃‘(𝐼 + 1))}))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem2fv2 30066*	Lemma 4b for clwlkclwwlklem2a 30068. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)})))    ⇒   ⊢ (((♯‘𝑃) ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (𝐹‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)) = (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)), (𝑃‘0)}))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem2a4 30067*	Lemma 4 for clwlkclwwlklem2a 30068. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)})))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1))) → ({(𝑃‘𝐼), (𝑃‘(𝐼 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 → (𝐸‘(𝐹‘𝐼)) = {(𝑃‘𝐼), (𝑃‘(𝐼 + 1))})))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem2a 30068*	Lemma for clwlkclwwlklem2 30070. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)})))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((((♯‘𝑃) − 1) − 0) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 ∧ {(𝑃‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)), (𝑃‘0)} ∈ ran 𝐸)) → ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐸 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐸‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))}) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)))))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem1 30069*	Lemma 1 for clwlkclwwlk 30072. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((((♯‘𝑃) − 1) − 0) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 ∧ {(𝑃‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)), (𝑃‘0)} ∈ ran 𝐸)) → ∃𝑓((𝑓 ∈ Word dom 𝐸 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))(𝐸‘(𝑓‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))}) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝑓)))))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem2 30070*	Lemma 2 for clwlkclwwlk 30072. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→𝑅 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐸) ∧ (𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐸‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)))) → ((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝐹) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 ∧ {(𝑃‘((♯‘𝐹) − 1)), (𝑃‘0)} ∈ ran 𝐸))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem3 30071*	Lemma 3 for clwlkclwwlk 30072. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (∃𝑓((𝑓 ∈ Word dom 𝐸 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))(𝐸‘(𝑓‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))}) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝑓))) ↔ ((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((((♯‘𝑃) − 1) − 0) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 ∧ {(𝑃‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)), (𝑃‘0)} ∈ ran 𝐸))))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlk 30072*	A closed walk as word of length at least 2 corresponds to a closed walk in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (∃𝑓 𝑓(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ ((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ (𝑃 prefix ((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺))))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlk2 30073*	A closed walk corresponds to a closed walk as word in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 1 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (∃𝑓 𝑓(ClWalks‘𝐺)(𝑃 ++ ⟨“(𝑃‘0)”⟩) ↔ 𝑃 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺)))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlkflem 30074*	Lemma for clwlkclwwlkf 30078. (Contributed by AV, 24-May-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))}    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (1st ‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (2nd ‘𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴(Walks‘𝐺)𝐵 ∧ (𝐵‘0) = (𝐵‘(♯‘𝐴)) ∧ (♯‘𝐴) ∈ ℕ))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlkf1lem2 30075*	Lemma 2 for clwlkclwwlkf1 30080. (Contributed by AV, 24-May-2022.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))}    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (1st ‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (2nd ‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (1st ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (2nd ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐵 prefix (♯‘𝐴)) = (𝐸 prefix (♯‘𝐷))) → ((♯‘𝐴) = (♯‘𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐴))(𝐵‘𝑖) = (𝐸‘𝑖)))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlkf1lem3 30076*	Lemma 3 for clwlkclwwlkf1 30080. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))}    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (1st ‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (2nd ‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (1st ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (2nd ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐵 prefix (♯‘𝐴)) = (𝐸 prefix (♯‘𝐷))) → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐴))(𝐵‘𝑖) = (𝐸‘𝑖))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlkfolem 30077*	Lemma for clwlkclwwlkfo 30079. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 1 ≤ (♯‘𝑊) ∧ ⟨𝑓, (𝑊 ++ ⟨“(𝑊‘0)”⟩)⟩ ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺)) → ⟨𝑓, (𝑊 ++ ⟨“(𝑊‘0)”⟩)⟩ ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	clwlkclwwlkf 30078*	𝐹 is a function from the nonempty closed walks into the closed walks as word in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2022.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑐) prefix ((♯‘(2nd ‘𝑐)) − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐹:𝐶⟶(ClWWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlkfo 30079*	𝐹 is a function from the nonempty closed walks onto the closed walks as words in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 2-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑐) prefix ((♯‘(2nd ‘𝑐)) − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐹:𝐶–onto→(ClWWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlkf1 30080*	𝐹 is a one-to-one function from the nonempty closed walks into the closed walks as words in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 3-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑐) prefix ((♯‘(2nd ‘𝑐)) − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1→(ClWWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlkf1o 30081*	𝐹 is a bijection between the nonempty closed walks and the closed walks as words in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 3-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑐) prefix ((♯‘(2nd ‘𝑐)) − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→(ClWWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlken 30082*	The set of the nonempty closed walks and the set of closed walks as word are equinumerous in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 4-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))} ≈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwwisshclwwslemlem 30083*	Lemma for clwwisshclwwslem 30084. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (((𝐿 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(𝐿 − 1)){(𝑊‘𝑖), (𝑊‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝑅 ∧ {(𝑊‘(𝐿 − 1)), (𝑊‘0)} ∈ 𝑅) → {(𝑊‘((𝐴 + 𝐵) mod 𝐿)), (𝑊‘(((𝐴 + 1) + 𝐵) mod 𝐿))} ∈ 𝑅)
Theorem	clwwisshclwwslem 30084*	Lemma for clwwisshclwws 30085. (Contributed by AV, 24-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑊))) → ((∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑊) − 1)){(𝑊‘𝑖), (𝑊‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {(lastS‘𝑊), (𝑊‘0)} ∈ 𝐸) → ∀𝑗 ∈ (0..^((♯‘(𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁)) − 1)){((𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁)‘𝑗), ((𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁)‘(𝑗 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	clwwisshclwws 30085	Cyclically shifting a closed walk as word results in a closed walk as word (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))) → (𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁) ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwwisshclwwsn 30086	Cyclically shifting a closed walk as word results in a closed walk as word (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑊))) → (𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁) ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	erclwwlkrel 30087	∼ is a relation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑢, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ Rel ∼
Theorem	erclwwlkeq 30088*	Two classes are equivalent regarding ∼ if both are words and one is the other cyclically shifted. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑢, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑈 ∼ 𝑊 ↔ (𝑈 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑊))𝑈 = (𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛))))
Theorem	erclwwlkeqlen 30089*	If two classes are equivalent regarding ∼, then they are words of the same length. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑢, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑈 ∼ 𝑊 → (♯‘𝑈) = (♯‘𝑊)))
Theorem	erclwwlkref 30090*	∼ is a reflexive relation over the set of closed walks (defined as words). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑢, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ↔ 𝑥 ∼ 𝑥)
Theorem	erclwwlksym 30091*	∼ is a symmetric relation over the set of closed walks (defined as words). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑢, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∼ 𝑦 → 𝑦 ∼ 𝑥)
Theorem	erclwwlktr 30092*	∼ is a transitive relation over the set of closed walks (defined as words). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑢, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∼ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ∼ 𝑧)
Theorem	erclwwlk 30093*	∼ is an equivalence relation over the set of closed walks (defined as words). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑢, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ∼ Er (ClWWalks‘𝐺)
17.3.10.2  Closed walks of a fixed length as words
Syntax	cclwwlkn 30094	Extend class notation with closed walks (in an undirected graph) of a fixed length as word over the set of vertices.
class ClWWalksN
Definition	df-clwwlkn 30095*	Define the set of all closed walks of a fixed length 𝑛 as words over the set of vertices in a graph 𝑔. If 0 < 𝑛, such a word corresponds to the sequence p(0) p(1) ... p(n-1) of the vertices in a closed walk p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n)=p(0) as defined in df-clwlks 29839. For 𝑛 = 0, the set is empty, see clwwlkn0 30098. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 22-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ClWWalksN = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝑔) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = 𝑛})
Theorem	clwwlkn 30096*	The set of closed walks of a fixed length 𝑁 as words over the set of vertices in a graph 𝐺. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 22-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = 𝑁}
Theorem	isclwwlkn 30097	A word over the set of vertices representing a closed walk of a fixed length. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 22-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ (♯‘𝑊) = 𝑁))
Theorem	clwwlkn0 30098	There is no closed walk of length 0 (i.e. a closed walk without any edge) represented by a word of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (0 ClWWalksN 𝐺) = ∅
Theorem	clwwlkneq0 30099	Sufficient conditions for ClWWalksN to be empty. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 24-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∉ V ∨ 𝑁 ∉ ℕ) → (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) = ∅)
Theorem	clwwlkclwwlkn 30100	A closed walk of a fixed length as word is a closed walk (in an undirected graph) as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 22-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) → 𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺))