P. 301 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 30001-30100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	1to2vfriswmgr 30001*	Every friendship graph with one or two vertices is a windmill graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑉 = {𝐴} ∨ 𝑉 = {𝐴, 𝐵})) → (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph → ∃ℎ ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑣 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {ℎ})({𝑣, ℎ} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∃!𝑤 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {ℎ}){𝑣, 𝑤} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	1to3vfriswmgr 30002*	Every friendship graph with one, two or three vertices is a windmill graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑉 = {𝐴} ∨ 𝑉 = {𝐴, 𝐵} ∨ 𝑉 = {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶})) → (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph → ∃ℎ ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑣 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {ℎ})({𝑣, ℎ} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∃!𝑤 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {ℎ}){𝑣, 𝑤} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	1to3vfriendship 30003*	The friendship theorem for small graphs: In every friendship graph with one, two or three vertices, there is a vertex which is adjacent to all other vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑉 = {𝐴} ∨ 𝑉 = {𝐴, 𝐵} ∨ 𝑉 = {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶})) → (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑤 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑣}){𝑣, 𝑤} ∈ 𝐸))
17.5.3  Theorems according to Mertzios and Unger
Theorem	2pthfrgrrn 30004*	Between any two (different) vertices in a friendship graph is a 2-path (path of length 2), see Proposition 1(b) of [MertziosUnger] p. 153 : "A friendship graph G ..., as well as the distance between any two nodes in G is at most two". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 1-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑐 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑎})∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑐} ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	2pthfrgrrn2 30005*	Between any two (different) vertices in a friendship graph is a 2-path (path of length 2), see Proposition 1(b) of [MertziosUnger] p. 153 : "A friendship graph G ..., as well as the distance between any two nodes in G is at most two". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 16-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 1-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑐 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑎})∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 (({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑐} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ (𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑐)))
Theorem	2pthfrgr 30006*	Between any two (different) vertices in a friendship graph, tere is a 2-path (simple path of length 2), see Proposition 1(b) of [MertziosUnger] p. 153 : "A friendship graph G ..., as well as the distance between any two nodes in G is at most two". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 1-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑎})∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(𝑎(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝑏)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2))
Theorem	3cyclfrgrrn1 30007*	Every vertex in a friendship graph (with more than 1 vertex) is part of a 3-cycle. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 16-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 2-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝐴, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑐} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑐, 𝐴} ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	3cyclfrgrrn 30008*	Every vertex in a friendship graph (with more than 1 vertex) is part of a 3-cycle. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 16-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 2-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝑉)) → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑐} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑐, 𝑎} ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	3cyclfrgrrn2 30009*	Every vertex in a friendship graph (with more than 1 vertex) is part of a 3-cycle. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 2-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝑉)) → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑏 ≠ 𝑐 ∧ ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑐} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑐, 𝑎} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	3cyclfrgr 30010*	Every vertex in a friendship graph (with more than 1 vertex) is part of a 3-cycle. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 2-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝑉)) → ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 3 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = 𝑣))
Theorem	4cycl2v2nb 30011	In a (maybe degenerate) 4-cycle, two vertice have two (maybe not different) common neighbors. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 2-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ ({𝐶, 𝐷} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐷, 𝐴} ∈ 𝐸)) → ({{𝐴, 𝐵}, {𝐵, 𝐶}} ⊆ 𝐸 ∧ {{𝐴, 𝐷}, {𝐷, 𝐶}} ⊆ 𝐸))
Theorem	4cycl2vnunb 30012*	In a 4-cycle, two distinct vertices have not a unique common neighbor. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 2-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ ({𝐶, 𝐷} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐷, 𝐴} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷)) → ¬ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 {{𝐴, 𝑥}, {𝑥, 𝐶}} ⊆ 𝐸)
Theorem	n4cyclfrgr 30013	There is no 4-cycle in a friendship graph, see Proposition 1(a) of [MertziosUnger] p. 153 : "A friendship graph G contains no C4 as a subgraph ...". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 2-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃) → (♯‘𝐹) ≠ 4)
Theorem	4cyclusnfrgr 30014	A graph with a 4-cycle is not a friendhip graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 2-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷)) → ((({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ ({𝐶, 𝐷} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐷, 𝐴} ∈ 𝐸)) → 𝐺 ∉ FriendGraph ))
Theorem	frgrnbnb 30015	If two neighbors 𝑈 and 𝑊 of a vertex 𝑋 have a common neighbor 𝐴 in a friendship graph, then this common neighbor 𝐴 must be the vertex 𝑋. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 2-Apr-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 13-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑊) → (({𝑈, 𝐴} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑊, 𝐴} ∈ 𝐸) → 𝐴 = 𝑋))
Theorem	frgrconngr 30016	A friendship graph is connected, see remark 1 in [MertziosUnger] p. 153 (after Proposition 1): "An arbitrary friendship graph has to be connected, ... ". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 1-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph → 𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph)
Theorem	vdgn0frgrv2 30017	A vertex in a friendship graph with more than one vertex cannot have degree 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (1 < (♯‘𝑉) → ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑁) ≠ 0))
Theorem	vdgn1frgrv2 30018	Any vertex in a friendship graph does not have degree 1, see remark 2 in [MertziosUnger] p. 153 (after Proposition 1): "... no node v of it [a friendship graph] may have deg(v) = 1.". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (1 < (♯‘𝑉) → ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑁) ≠ 1))
Theorem	vdgn1frgrv3 30019*	Any vertex in a friendship graph does not have degree 1, see remark 2 in [MertziosUnger] p. 153 (after Proposition 1): "... no node v of it [a friendship graph] may have deg(v) = 1.". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝑉)) → ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑣) ≠ 1)
Theorem	vdgfrgrgt2 30020	Any vertex in a friendship graph (with more than one vertex - then, actually, the graph must have at least three vertices, because otherwise, it would not be a friendship graph) has at least degree 2, see remark 3 in [MertziosUnger] p. 153 (after Proposition 1): "It follows that deg(v) >= 2 for every node v of a friendship graph". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 5-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (1 < (♯‘𝑉) → 2 ≤ ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑁)))
17.5.4  Huneke's Proof of the Friendship Theorem In this section, the friendship theorem friendship 30121 is proven by formalizing Huneke's proof, see [Huneke] pp. 1-2. The three claims (see frgrncvvdeq 30031, frgrregorufr 30047 and frrusgrord0 30062) and additional statements (numbered in the order of their occurrence in the paper) in Huneke's proof are cited in the corresponding theorems.
Theorem	frgrncvvdeqlem1 30021	Lemma 1 for frgrncvvdeq 30031. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 8-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∉ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph )    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∉ 𝑁)
Theorem	frgrncvvdeqlem2 30022*	Lemma 2 for frgrncvvdeq 30031. In a friendship graph, for each neighbor of a vertex there is exactly one neighbor of another vertex so that there is an edge between these two neighbors. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∉ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph )    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ 𝐸)
Theorem	frgrncvvdeqlem3 30023*	Lemma 3 for frgrncvvdeq 30031. The unique neighbor of a vertex (expressed by a restricted iota) is the intersection of the corresponding neighborhoods. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∉ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph )    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → {(℩𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ 𝐸)} = ((𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑥) ∩ 𝑁))
Theorem	frgrncvvdeqlem4 30024*	Lemma 4 for frgrncvvdeq 30031. The mapping of neighbors to neighbors is a function. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∉ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph )    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝐷⟶𝑁)
Theorem	frgrncvvdeqlem5 30025*	Lemma 5 for frgrncvvdeq 30031. The mapping of neighbors to neighbors applied on a vertex is the intersection of the corresponding neighborhoods. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∉ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph )    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → {(𝐴‘𝑥)} = ((𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑥) ∩ 𝑁))
Theorem	frgrncvvdeqlem6 30026*	Lemma 6 for frgrncvvdeq 30031. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∉ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph )    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → {𝑥, (𝐴‘𝑥)} ∈ 𝐸)
Theorem	frgrncvvdeqlem7 30027*	Lemma 7 for frgrncvvdeq 30031. This corresponds to statement 1 in [Huneke] p. 1: "This common neighbor cannot be x, as x and y are not adjacent.". This is only an observation, which is not required to proof the friendship theorem. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∉ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph )    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑋)
Theorem	frgrncvvdeqlem8 30028*	Lemma 8 for frgrncvvdeq 30031. This corresponds to statement 2 in [Huneke] p. 1: "The map is one-to-one since z in N(x) is uniquely determined as the common neighbor of x and a(x)". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∉ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph )    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝐷–1-1→𝑁)
Theorem	frgrncvvdeqlem9 30029*	Lemma 9 for frgrncvvdeq 30031. This corresponds to statement 3 in [Huneke] p. 1: "By symmetry the map is onto". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∉ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph )    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝐷–onto→𝑁)
Theorem	frgrncvvdeqlem10 30030*	Lemma 10 for frgrncvvdeq 30031. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∉ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph )    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝐷–1-1-onto→𝑁)
Theorem	frgrncvvdeq 30031*	In a friendship graph, two vertices which are not connected by an edge have the same degree. This corresponds to claim 1 in [Huneke] p. 1: "If x,y are elements of (the friendship graph) G and are not adjacent, then they have the same degree (i.e., the same number of adjacent vertices).". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥})(𝑦 ∉ (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑥) → (𝐷‘𝑥) = (𝐷‘𝑦)))
Theorem	frgrwopreglem4a 30032	In a friendship graph any two vertices with different degrees are connected. Alternate version of frgrwopreglem4 30037 without a fixed degree and without using the sets 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 4-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐷‘𝑋) ≠ (𝐷‘𝑌)) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ 𝐸)
Theorem	frgrwopreglem5a 30033	If a friendship graph has two vertices with the same degree and two other vertices with different degrees, then there is a 4-cycle in the graph. Alternate version of frgrwopreglem5 30043 without a fixed degree and without using the sets 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 4-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ ((𝐷‘𝐴) = (𝐷‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐷‘𝐴) ≠ (𝐷‘𝐵) ∧ (𝐷‘𝑋) ≠ (𝐷‘𝑌))) → (({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝑋} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ ({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑌, 𝐴} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	frgrwopreglem1 30034*	Lemma 1 for frgrwopreg 30045: the classes 𝐴 and 𝐵 are sets. The definition of 𝐴 and 𝐵 corresponds to definition 3 in [Huneke] p. 2: "Let A be the set of all vertices of degree k, let B be the set of all vertices of degree different from k, ..." (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝐷‘𝑥) = 𝐾}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑉 ∖ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)
Theorem	frgrwopreglem2 30035*	Lemma 2 for frgrwopreg 30045. If the set 𝐴 of vertices of degree 𝐾 is not empty in a friendship graph with at least two vertices, then 𝐾 must be greater than 1 . This is only an observation, which is not required for the proof the friendship theorem. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝐷‘𝑥) = 𝐾}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑉 ∖ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → 2 ≤ 𝐾)
Theorem	frgrwopreglem3 30036*	Lemma 3 for frgrwopreg 30045. The vertices in the sets 𝐴 and 𝐵 have different degrees. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝐷‘𝑥) = 𝐾}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑉 ∖ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐷‘𝑋) ≠ (𝐷‘𝑌))
Theorem	frgrwopreglem4 30037*	Lemma 4 for frgrwopreg 30045. In a friendship graph each vertex with degree 𝐾 is connected with any vertex with degree other than 𝐾. This corresponds to statement 4 in [Huneke] p. 2: "By the first claim, every vertex in A is adjacent to every vertex in B.". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 4-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝐷‘𝑥) = 𝐾}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑉 ∖ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 {𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸)
Theorem	frgrwopregasn 30038*	According to statement 5 in [Huneke] p. 2: "If A ... is a singleton, then that singleton is a universal friend". This version of frgrwopreg1 30040 is stricter (claiming that the singleton itself is a universal friend instead of claiming the existence of a universal friend only) and therefore closer to Huneke's statement. This strict variant, however, is not required for the proof of the friendship theorem. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 4-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝐷‘𝑥) = 𝐾}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑉 ∖ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = {𝑋}) → ∀𝑤 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑋}){𝑋, 𝑤} ∈ 𝐸)
Theorem	frgrwopregbsn 30039*	According to statement 5 in [Huneke] p. 2: "If ... B is a singleton, then that singleton is a universal friend". This version of frgrwopreg2 30041 is stricter (claiming that the singleton itself is a universal friend instead of claiming the existence of a universal friend only) and therefore closer to Huneke's statement. This strict variant, however, is not required for the proof of the friendship theorem. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝐷‘𝑥) = 𝐾}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑉 ∖ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 = {𝑋}) → ∀𝑤 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑋}){𝑋, 𝑤} ∈ 𝐸)
Theorem	frgrwopreg1 30040*	According to statement 5 in [Huneke] p. 2: "If A ... is a singleton, then that singleton is a universal friend". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jan-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 4-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝐷‘𝑥) = 𝐾}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑉 ∖ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐴) = 1) → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑤 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑣}){𝑣, 𝑤} ∈ 𝐸)
Theorem	frgrwopreg2 30041*	According to statement 5 in [Huneke] p. 2: "If ... B is a singleton, then that singleton is a universal friend". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jan-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 4-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝐷‘𝑥) = 𝐾}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑉 ∖ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐵) = 1) → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑤 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑣}){𝑣, 𝑤} ∈ 𝐸)
Theorem	frgrwopreglem5lem 30042*	Lemma for frgrwopreglem5 30043. (Contributed by AV, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝐷‘𝑥) = 𝐾}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑉 ∖ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝐷‘𝑎) = (𝐷‘𝑥) ∧ (𝐷‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐷‘𝑏) ∧ (𝐷‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐷‘𝑦)))
Theorem	frgrwopreglem5 30043*	Lemma 5 for frgrwopreg 30045. If 𝐴 as well as 𝐵 contain at least two vertices, there is a 4-cycle in a friendship graph. This corresponds to statement 6 in [Huneke] p. 2: "... otherwise, there are two different vertices in A, and they have two common neighbors in B, ...". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Dec-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝐷‘𝑥) = 𝐾}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑉 ∖ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝐴) ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝐵)) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑎 ≠ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑦) ∧ ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑥} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑦, 𝑎} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	frgrwopreglem5ALT 30044*	Alternate direct proof of frgrwopreglem5 30043, not using frgrwopreglem5a 30033. This proof would be even a little bit shorter than the proof of frgrwopreglem5 30043 without using frgrwopreglem5lem 30042. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jan-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-Feb-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝐷‘𝑥) = 𝐾}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑉 ∖ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝐴) ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝐵)) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑎 ≠ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑦) ∧ ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑥} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑦, 𝑎} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	frgrwopreg 30045*	In a friendship graph there are either no vertices (𝐴 = ∅) or exactly one vertex ((♯‘𝐴) = 1) having degree 𝐾, or all (𝐵 = ∅) or all except one vertices ((♯‘𝐵) = 1) have degree 𝐾. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 3-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝐷‘𝑥) = 𝐾}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑉 ∖ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph → (((♯‘𝐴) = 1 ∨ 𝐴 = ∅) ∨ ((♯‘𝐵) = 1 ∨ 𝐵 = ∅)))
Theorem	frgrregorufr0 30046*	In a friendship graph there are either no vertices having degree 𝐾, or all vertices have degree 𝐾 for any (nonnegative integer) 𝐾, unless there is a universal friend. This corresponds to claim 2 in [Huneke] p. 2: "... all vertices have degree k, unless there is a universal friend." (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 3-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph → (∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝐷‘𝑣) = 𝐾 ∨ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝐷‘𝑣) ≠ 𝐾 ∨ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑤 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑣}){𝑣, 𝑤} ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	frgrregorufr 30047*	If there is a vertex having degree 𝐾 for each (nonnegative integer) 𝐾 in a friendship graph, then either all vertices have degree 𝐾 or there is a universal friend. This corresponds to claim 2 in [Huneke] p. 2: "Suppose there is a vertex of degree k > 1. ... all vertices have degree k, unless there is a universal friend. ... It follows that G is k-regular, i.e., the degree of every vertex is k". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jan-2018.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph → (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 (𝐷‘𝑎) = 𝐾 → (∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝐷‘𝑣) = 𝐾 ∨ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑤 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑣}){𝑣, 𝑤} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	frgrregorufrg 30048*	If there is a vertex having degree 𝑘 for each nonnegative integer 𝑘 in a friendship graph, then there is a universal friend. This corresponds to claim 2 in [Huneke] p. 2: "Suppose there is a vertex of degree k > 1. ... all vertices have degree k, unless there is a universal friend. ... It follows that G is k-regular, i.e., the degree of every vertex is k". Variant of frgrregorufr 30047 with generalization. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 26-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph → ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑎) = 𝑘 → (𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝑘 ∨ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑤 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑣}){𝑣, 𝑤} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	frgr2wwlkeu 30049*	For two different vertices in a friendship graph, there is exactly one third vertex being the middle vertex of a (simple) path/walk of length 2 between the two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 4-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∃!𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 ⟨“𝐴𝑐𝐵”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐵))
Theorem	frgr2wwlkn0 30050	In a friendship graph, there is always a path/walk of length 2 between two different vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐵) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	frgr2wwlk1 30051	In a friendship graph, there is exactly one walk of length 2 between two different vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 13-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (♯‘(𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐵)) = 1)
Theorem	frgr2wsp1 30052	In a friendship graph, there is exactly one simple path of length 2 between two different vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 13-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (♯‘(𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐵)) = 1)
Theorem	frgr2wwlkeqm 30053	If there is a (simple) path of length 2 from one vertex to another vertex and a (simple) path of length 2 from the other vertex back to the first vertex in a friendship graph, then the middle vertex is the same. This is only an observation, which is not required to proof the friendship theorem. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 13-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 7-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝑌)) → ((⟨“𝐴𝑃𝐵”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐵) ∧ ⟨“𝐵𝑄𝐴”⟩ ∈ (𝐵(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐴)) → 𝑄 = 𝑃))
Theorem	frgrhash2wsp 30054	The number of simple paths of length 2 is n*(n-1) in a friendship graph with n vertices. This corresponds to the proof of claim 3 in [Huneke] p. 2: "... the paths of length two in G: by assumption there are ( n 2 ) such paths.". However, Huneke counts undirected paths, so obtains the result ((𝑛C2) = ((𝑛 · (𝑛 − 1)) / 2)), whereas we count directed paths, obtaining twice that number. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 𝑉 ∈ Fin) → (♯‘(2 WSPathsN 𝐺)) = ((♯‘𝑉) · ((♯‘𝑉) − 1)))
Theorem	fusgreg2wsplem 30055*	Lemma for fusgreg2wsp 30058 and related theorems. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (2 WSPathsN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘1) = 𝑎})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑝 ∈ (𝑀‘𝑁) ↔ (𝑝 ∈ (2 WSPathsN 𝐺) ∧ (𝑝‘1) = 𝑁)))
Theorem	fusgr2wsp2nb 30056*	The set of paths of length 2 with a given vertex in the middle for a finite simple graph is the union of all paths of length 2 from one neighbor to another neighbor of this vertex via this vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (2 WSPathsN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘1) = 𝑎})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FinUSGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑀‘𝑁) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑁)∪ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑁) ∖ {𝑥}){⟨“𝑥𝑁𝑦”⟩})
Theorem	fusgreghash2wspv 30057*	According to statement 7 in [Huneke] p. 2: "For each vertex v, there are exactly ( k 2 ) paths with length two having v in the middle, ..." in a finite k-regular graph. For directed simple paths of length 2 represented by length 3 strings, we have again k*(k-1) such paths, see also comment of frgrhash2wsp 30054. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (2 WSPathsN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘1) = 𝑎})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ FinUSGraph → ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑣) = 𝐾 → (♯‘(𝑀‘𝑣)) = (𝐾 · (𝐾 − 1))))
Theorem	fusgreg2wsp 30058*	In a finite simple graph, the set of all paths of length 2 is the union of all the paths of length 2 over the vertices which are in the middle of such a path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (2 WSPathsN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘1) = 𝑎})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ FinUSGraph → (2 WSPathsN 𝐺) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑀‘𝑥))
Theorem	2wspmdisj 30059*	The sets of paths of length 2 with a given vertex in the middle are distinct for different vertices in the middle. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (2 WSPathsN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘1) = 𝑎})    ⇒   ⊢ Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑀‘𝑥)
Theorem	fusgreghash2wsp 30060*	In a finite k-regular graph with N vertices there are N times "k choose 2" paths with length 2, according to statement 8 in [Huneke] p. 2: "... giving n * ( k 2 ) total paths of length two.", if the direction of traversing the path is not respected. For simple paths of length 2 represented by length 3 strings, however, we have again n*k*(k-1) such paths. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 19-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FinUSGraph ∧ 𝑉 ≠ ∅) → (∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑣) = 𝐾 → (♯‘(2 WSPathsN 𝐺)) = ((♯‘𝑉) · (𝐾 · (𝐾 − 1)))))
Theorem	frrusgrord0lem 30061*	Lemma for frrusgrord0 30062. (Contributed by AV, 12-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑉 ≠ ∅) ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑣) = 𝐾) → (𝐾 ∈ ℂ ∧ (♯‘𝑉) ∈ ℂ ∧ (♯‘𝑉) ≠ 0))
Theorem	frrusgrord0 30062*	If a nonempty finite friendship graph is k-regular, its order is k(k-1)+1. This corresponds to claim 3 in [Huneke] p. 2: "Next we claim that the number n of vertices in G is exactly k(k-1)+1.". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 26-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑉 ≠ ∅) → (∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑣) = 𝐾 → (♯‘𝑉) = ((𝐾 · (𝐾 − 1)) + 1)))
Theorem	frrusgrord 30063	If a nonempty finite friendship graph is k-regular, its order is k(k-1)+1. This corresponds to claim 3 in [Huneke] p. 2: "Next we claim that the number n of vertices in G is exactly k(k-1)+1.". Variant of frrusgrord0 30062, using the definition RegUSGraph (df-rusgr 29284). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 26-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑉 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾) → (♯‘𝑉) = ((𝐾 · (𝐾 − 1)) + 1)))
Theorem	numclwwlk2lem1lem 30064	Lemma for numclwwlk2lem1 30098. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Oct-2018.) (Revised by AV, 27-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 15-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∧ (lastS‘𝑊) ≠ (𝑊‘0)) → (((𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩)‘0) = (𝑊‘0) ∧ ((𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩)‘𝑁) ≠ (𝑊‘0)))
Theorem	2clwwlklem 30065	Lemma for clwwnonrepclwwnon 30067 and extwwlkfab 30074. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-May-2022.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) → ((𝑊 prefix (𝑁 − 2))‘0) = (𝑊‘0))
Theorem	clwwnrepclwwn 30066	If the initial vertex of a closed walk occurs another time in the walk, the walk starts with a closed walk. Notice that 3 ≤ 𝑁 is required, because for 𝑁 = 2, (𝑤 prefix (𝑁 − 2)) = (𝑤 prefix 0) = ∅, but ∅ (and anything else) is not a representation of an empty closed walk as word, see clwwlkn0 29750. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) ∧ (𝑊‘(𝑁 − 2)) = (𝑊‘0)) → (𝑊 prefix (𝑁 − 2)) ∈ ((𝑁 − 2) ClWWalksN 𝐺))
Theorem	clwwnonrepclwwnon 30067	If the initial vertex of a closed walk occurs another time in the walk, the walk starts with a closed walk on this vertex. See also the remarks in clwwnrepclwwn 30066. (Contributed by AV, 24-Apr-2022.) (Revised by AV, 10-May-2022.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) ∧ (𝑊‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋) → (𝑊 prefix (𝑁 − 2)) ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)(𝑁 − 2)))
Theorem	2clwwlk2clwwlklem 30068	Lemma for 2clwwlk2clwwlk 30072. (Contributed by AV, 27-Apr-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) ∧ (𝑊‘(𝑁 − 2)) = (𝑊‘0)) → (𝑊 substr ⟨(𝑁 − 2), 𝑁⟩) ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)2))
Theorem	2clwwlk 30069*	Value of operation 𝐶, mapping a vertex v and an integer n greater than 1 to the "closed n-walks v(0) ... v(n-2) v(n-1) v(n) from v = v(0) = v(n) with v(n-2) = v" according to definition 6 in [Huneke] p. 2. Such closed walks are "double loops" consisting of a closed (n-2)-walk v = v(0) ... v(n-2) = v and a closed 2-walk v = v(n-2) v(n-1) v(n) = v, see 2clwwlk2clwwlk 30072. (𝑋𝐶𝑁) is called the "set of double loops of length 𝑁 on vertex 𝑋 " in the following. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 14-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 20-Apr-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝑋𝐶𝑁) = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋})
Theorem	2clwwlk2 30070*	The set (𝑋𝐶2) of double loops of length 2 on a vertex 𝑋 is equal to the set of closed walks with length 2 on 𝑋. Considered as "double loops", the first of the two closed walks/loops is degenerated, i.e., has length 0. (Contributed by AV, 18-Feb-2022.) (Revised by AV, 20-Apr-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋𝐶2) = (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)2))
Theorem	2clwwlkel 30071*	Characterization of an element of the value of operation 𝐶, i.e., of a word being a double loop of length 𝑁 on vertex 𝑋. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 20-Apr-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝑋𝐶𝑁) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) ∧ (𝑊‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋)))
Theorem	2clwwlk2clwwlk 30072*	An element of the value of operation 𝐶, i.e., a word being a double loop of length 𝑁 on vertex 𝑋, is composed of two closed walks. (Contributed by AV, 28-Apr-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 3-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝑋𝐶𝑁) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)(𝑁 − 2))∃𝑏 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)2)𝑊 = (𝑎 ++ 𝑏)))
Theorem	numclwwlk1lem2foalem 30073	Lemma for numclwwlk1lem2foa 30076. (Contributed by AV, 29-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 1-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ (♯‘𝑊) = (𝑁 − 2)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) → ((((𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩) ++ ⟨“𝑌”⟩) prefix (𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑊 ∧ (((𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩) ++ ⟨“𝑌”⟩)‘(𝑁 − 1)) = 𝑌 ∧ (((𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩) ++ ⟨“𝑌”⟩)‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋))
Theorem	extwwlkfab 30074*	The set (𝑋𝐶𝑁) of double loops of length 𝑁 on vertex 𝑋 can be constructed from the set 𝐹 of closed walks on 𝑋 with length smaller by 2 than the fixed length by appending a neighbor of the last vertex and afterwards the last vertex (which is the first vertex) itself ("walking forth and back" from the last vertex). 3 ≤ 𝑁 is required since for 𝑁 = 2: 𝐹 = (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)0) = ∅ (see clwwlk0on0 29814 stating that a closed walk of length 0 is not represented as word), which would result in an empty set on the right hand side, but (𝑋𝐶𝑁) needs not be empty, see 2clwwlk2 30070. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 31-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)(𝑁 − 2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) → (𝑋𝐶𝑁) = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤 prefix (𝑁 − 2)) ∈ 𝐹 ∧ (𝑤‘(𝑁 − 1)) ∈ (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋) ∧ (𝑤‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋)})
Theorem	extwwlkfabel 30075*	Characterization of an element of the set (𝑋𝐶𝑁), i.e., a double loop of length 𝑁 on vertex 𝑋 with a construction from the set 𝐹 of closed walks on 𝑋 with length smaller by 2 than the fixed length by appending a neighbor of the last vertex and afterwards the last vertex (which is the first vertex) itself ("walking forth and back" from the last vertex). (Contributed by AV, 22-Feb-2022.) (Revised by AV, 31-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)(𝑁 − 2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝑋𝐶𝑁) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) ∧ ((𝑊 prefix (𝑁 − 2)) ∈ 𝐹 ∧ (𝑊‘(𝑁 − 1)) ∈ (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋) ∧ (𝑊‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋))))
Theorem	numclwwlk1lem2foa 30076*	Going forth and back from the end of a (closed) walk: 𝑊 represents the closed walk p0, ..., p(n-2), p0 = p(n-2). With 𝑋 = p(n-2) = p0 and 𝑌 = p(n-1), ((𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩) ++ ⟨“𝑌”⟩) represents the closed walk p0, ..., p(n-2), p(n-1), pn = p0 which is a double loop of length 𝑁 on vertex 𝑋. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 5-Mar-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)(𝑁 − 2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) → ((𝑊 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)) → ((𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩) ++ ⟨“𝑌”⟩) ∈ (𝑋𝐶𝑁)))
Theorem	numclwwlk1lem2f 30077*	𝑇 is a function, mapping a double loop of length 𝑁 on vertex 𝑋 to the ordered pair of the first loop and the successor of 𝑋 in the second loop, which must be a neighbor of 𝑋. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 23-Feb-2022.) (Revised by AV, 31-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)(𝑁 − 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝑋𝐶𝑁) ↦ ⟨(𝑢 prefix (𝑁 − 2)), (𝑢‘(𝑁 − 1))⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) → 𝑇:(𝑋𝐶𝑁)⟶(𝐹 × (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)))
Theorem	numclwwlk1lem2fv 30078*	Value of the function 𝑇. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 31-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)(𝑁 − 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝑋𝐶𝑁) ↦ ⟨(𝑢 prefix (𝑁 − 2)), (𝑢‘(𝑁 − 1))⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑋𝐶𝑁) → (𝑇‘𝑊) = ⟨(𝑊 prefix (𝑁 − 2)), (𝑊‘(𝑁 − 1))⟩)
Theorem	numclwwlk1lem2f1 30079*	𝑇 is a 1-1 function. (Contributed by AV, 26-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 23-Feb-2022.) (Revised by AV, 31-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)(𝑁 − 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝑋𝐶𝑁) ↦ ⟨(𝑢 prefix (𝑁 − 2)), (𝑢‘(𝑁 − 1))⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) → 𝑇:(𝑋𝐶𝑁)–1-1→(𝐹 × (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)))
Theorem	numclwwlk1lem2fo 30080*	𝑇 is an onto function. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 13-Feb-2022.) (Revised by AV, 31-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)(𝑁 − 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝑋𝐶𝑁) ↦ ⟨(𝑢 prefix (𝑁 − 2)), (𝑢‘(𝑁 − 1))⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) → 𝑇:(𝑋𝐶𝑁)–onto→(𝐹 × (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)))
Theorem	numclwwlk1lem2f1o 30081*	𝑇 is a 1-1 onto function. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 6-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)(𝑁 − 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝑋𝐶𝑁) ↦ ⟨(𝑢 prefix (𝑁 − 2)), (𝑢‘(𝑁 − 1))⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) → 𝑇:(𝑋𝐶𝑁)–1-1-onto→(𝐹 × (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)))
Theorem	numclwwlk1lem2 30082*	The set of double loops of length 𝑁 on vertex 𝑋 and the set of closed walks of length less by 2 on 𝑋 combined with the neighbors of 𝑋 are equinumerous. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jul-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 3-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)(𝑁 − 2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) → (𝑋𝐶𝑁) ≈ (𝐹 × (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)))
Theorem	numclwwlk1 30083*	Statement 9 in [Huneke] p. 2: "If n > 1, then the number of closed n-walks v(0) ... v(n-2) v(n-1) v(n) from v = v(0) = v(n) with v(n-2) = v is kf(n-2)". Since 𝐺 is k-regular, the vertex v(n-2) = v has k neighbors v(n-1), so there are k walks from v(n-2) = v to v(n) = v (via each of v's neighbors) completing each of the f(n-2) walks from v=v(0) to v(n-2)=v. This theorem holds even for k=0, but not for n=2, since 𝐹 = ∅, but (𝑋𝐶2), the set of closed walks with length 2 on 𝑋, see 2clwwlk2 30070, needs not be ∅ in this case. This is because of the special definition of 𝐹 and the usage of words to represent (closed) walks, and does not contradict Huneke's statement, which would read "the number of closed 2-walks v(0) v(1) v(2) from v = v(0) = v(2) ... is kf(0)", where f(0)=1 is the number of empty closed walks on v, see numclwlk1lem1 30091. If the general representation of (closed) walk is used, Huneke's statement can be proven even for n = 2, see numclwlk1 30093. This case, however, is not required to prove the friendship theorem. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 6-Mar-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Jul-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)(𝑁 − 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))) → (♯‘(𝑋𝐶𝑁)) = (𝐾 · (♯‘𝐹)))
Theorem	clwwlknonclwlknonf1o 30084*	𝐹 is a bijection between the two representations of closed walks of a fixed positive length on a fixed vertex. (Contributed by AV, 26-May-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 7-Aug-2022.) (Revised by AV, 1-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑋)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑐) prefix (♯‘(1st ‘𝑐))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → 𝐹:𝑊–1-1-onto→(𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁))
Theorem	clwwlknonclwlknonen 30085*	The sets of the two representations of closed walks of a fixed positive length on a fixed vertex are equinumerous. (Contributed by AV, 27-May-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 3-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑋)} ≈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁))
Theorem	dlwwlknondlwlknonf1olem1 30086	Lemma 1 for dlwwlknondlwlknonf1o 30087. (Contributed by AV, 29-May-2022.) (Revised by AV, 1-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (((♯‘(1st ‘𝑐)) = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (((2nd ‘𝑐) prefix (♯‘(1st ‘𝑐)))‘(𝑁 − 2)) = ((2nd ‘𝑐)‘(𝑁 − 2)))
Theorem	dlwwlknondlwlknonf1o 30087*	𝐹 is a bijection between the two representations of double loops of a fixed positive length on a fixed vertex. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2022.) (Revised by AV, 1-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋)}    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑐) prefix (♯‘(1st ‘𝑐))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → 𝐹:𝑊–1-1-onto→𝐷)
Theorem	dlwwlknondlwlknonen 30088*	The sets of the two representations of double loops of a fixed length on a fixed vertex are equinumerous. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 3-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋)}    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → 𝑊 ≈ 𝐷)
Theorem	wlkl0 30089*	There is exactly one walk of length 0 on each vertex 𝑋. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 0 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑋)} = {⟨∅, {⟨0, 𝑋⟩}⟩})
Theorem	clwlknon2num 30090*	There are k walks of length 2 on each vertex 𝑋 in a k-regular simple graph. Variant of clwwlknon2num 29827, using the general definition of walks instead of walks as words. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 2 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑋)}) = 𝐾)
Theorem	numclwlk1lem1 30091*	Lemma 1 for numclwlk1 30093 (Statement 9 in [Huneke] p. 2 for n=2): "the number of closed 2-walks v(0) v(1) v(2) from v = v(0) = v(2) ... is kf(0)". (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = (𝑁 − 2) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑋)}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 = 2)) → (♯‘𝐶) = (𝐾 · (♯‘𝐹)))
Theorem	numclwlk1lem2 30092*	Lemma 2 for numclwlk1 30093 (Statement 9 in [Huneke] p. 2 for n>2). This theorem corresponds to numclwwlk1 30083, using the general definition of walks instead of walks as words. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = (𝑁 − 2) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑋)}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))) → (♯‘𝐶) = (𝐾 · (♯‘𝐹)))
Theorem	numclwlk1 30093*	Statement 9 in [Huneke] p. 2: "If n > 1, then the number of closed n-walks v(0) ... v(n-2) v(n-1) v(n) from v = v(0) = v(n) with v(n-2) = v is kf(n-2)". Since 𝐺 is k-regular, the vertex v(n-2) = v has k neighbors v(n-1), so there are k walks from v(n-2) = v to v(n) = v (via each of v's neighbors) completing each of the f(n-2) walks from v=v(0) to v(n-2)=v. This theorem holds even for k=0. (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = (𝑁 − 2) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑋)}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))) → (♯‘𝐶) = (𝐾 · (♯‘𝐹)))
Theorem	numclwwlkovh0 30094*	Value of operation 𝐻, mapping a vertex 𝑣 and an integer 𝑛 greater than 1 to the "closed n-walks v(0) ... v(n-2) v(n-1) v(n) from v = v(0) = v(n) ... with v(n-2) =/= v" according to definition 7 in [Huneke] p. 2. (Contributed by AV, 1-May-2022.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) ≠ 𝑣})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝑋𝐻𝑁) = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑁 − 2)) ≠ 𝑋})
Theorem	numclwwlkovh 30095*	Value of operation 𝐻, mapping a vertex 𝑣 and an integer 𝑛 greater than 1 to the "closed n-walks v(0) ... v(n-2) v(n-1) v(n) from v = v(0) = v(n) ... with v(n-2) =/= v" according to definition 7 in [Huneke] p. 2. Definition of ClWWalksNOn resolved. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 1-May-2022.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) ≠ 𝑣})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝑋𝐻𝑁) = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑤‘(𝑁 − 2)) ≠ (𝑤‘0))})
Theorem	numclwwlkovq 30096*	Value of operation 𝑄, mapping a vertex 𝑣 and a positive integer 𝑛 to the not closed walks v(0) ... v(n) of length 𝑛 from a fixed vertex 𝑣 = v(0). "Not closed" means v(n) =/= v(0). Remark: 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 would not be useful: numclwwlkqhash 30097 would not hold, because (𝐾↑0) = 1! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑣 ∧ (lastS‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑣)})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑋𝑄𝑁) = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ (lastS‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑋)})
Theorem	numclwwlkqhash 30097*	In a 𝐾-regular graph, the size of the set of walks of length 𝑁 starting with a fixed vertex 𝑋 and ending not at this vertex is the difference between 𝐾 to the power of 𝑁 and the size of the set of closed walks of length 𝑁 on vertex 𝑋. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 5-Mar-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 7-Jul-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑣 ∧ (lastS‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑣)})    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ Fin) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)) → (♯‘(𝑋𝑄𝑁)) = ((𝐾↑𝑁) − (♯‘(𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁))))
Theorem	numclwwlk2lem1 30098*	In a friendship graph, for each walk of length 𝑛 starting at a fixed vertex 𝑣 and ending not at this vertex, there is a unique vertex so that the walk extended by an edge to this vertex and an edge from this vertex to the first vertex of the walk is a value of operation 𝐻. If the walk is represented as a word, it is sufficient to add one vertex to the word to obtain the closed walk contained in the value of operation 𝐻, since in a word representing a closed walk the starting vertex is not repeated at the end. This theorem generally holds only for friendship graphs, because these guarantee that for the first and last vertex there is a (unique) third vertex "in between". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Oct-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 1-May-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑣 ∧ (lastS‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑣)})    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) ≠ 𝑣})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝑋𝑄𝑁) → ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑣”⟩) ∈ (𝑋𝐻(𝑁 + 2))))
Theorem	numclwlk2lem2f 30099*	𝑅 is a function mapping the "closed (n+2)-walks v(0) ... v(n-2) v(n-1) v(n) v(n+1) v(n+2) starting at 𝑋 = v(0) = v(n+2) with v(n) =/= X" to the words representing the prefix v(0) ... v(n-2) v(n-1) v(n) of the walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Oct-2018.) (Revised by AV, 31-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 23-Mar-2022.) (Revised by AV, 1-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑣 ∧ (lastS‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑣)})    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) ≠ 𝑣})    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝑋𝐻(𝑁 + 2)) ↦ (𝑥 prefix (𝑁 + 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → 𝑅:(𝑋𝐻(𝑁 + 2))⟶(𝑋𝑄𝑁))
Theorem	numclwlk2lem2fv 30100*	Value of the function 𝑅. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Oct-2018.) (Revised by AV, 31-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 1-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑣 ∧ (lastS‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑣)})    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) ≠ 𝑣})    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝑋𝐻(𝑁 + 2)) ↦ (𝑥 prefix (𝑁 + 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝑋𝐻(𝑁 + 2)) → (𝑅‘𝑊) = (𝑊 prefix (𝑁 + 1))))