Theorem nelbrim 42914

Description: If a set is related to another set by the negated membership relation, then it is not a member of the other set. The other direction of the implication is not generally true, because if 𝐴 is a proper class, then ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 would be true, but not 𝐴 _∉ 𝐵. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nelbrim	⊢ (𝐴 _∉ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem nelbrim

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-nelbr 42911	. . . 4 ⊢ _∉ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦}
2	1	relopabi 5540	. . 3 ⊢ Rel _∉
3	2	brrelex12i 5453	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 _∉ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
4		nelbr 42913	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴 _∉ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	biimpd 221	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴 _∉ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
6	3, 5	mpcom 38	1 ⊢ (𝐴 _∉ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 387   ∈ wcel 2051  Vcvv 3408   class class class wbr 4925   _∉ cnelbr 42910

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1759  ax-4 1773  ax-5 1870  ax-6 1929  ax-7 1966  ax-8 2053  ax-9 2060  ax-10 2080  ax-11 2094  ax-12 2107  ax-13 2302  ax-ext 2743  ax-sep 5056  ax-nul 5063  ax-pr 5182

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 388  df-or 835  df-3an 1071  df-tru 1511  df-ex 1744  df-nf 1748  df-sb 2017  df-mo 2548  df-eu 2585  df-clab 2752  df-cleq 2764  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2911  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3090  df-v 3410  df-dif 3825  df-un 3827  df-in 3829  df-ss 3836  df-nul 4173  df-if 4345  df-sn 4436  df-pr 4438  df-op 4442  df-br 4926  df-opab 4988  df-xp 5409  df-rel 5410  df-nelbr 42911

This theorem is referenced by:  nelbrnelim  42916