Theorem opcon1b 38068

Description: Orthocomplement contraposition law. (negcon1 11512 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
opoccl.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
opoccl.o	⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opcon1b	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) = 𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) = 𝑋))

Proof of Theorem opcon1b

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opoccl.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
2		opoccl.o	. . . 4 ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)
3	1, 2	opcon2b 38067	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ↔ 𝑌 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
4		eqcom 2740	. . 3 ⊢ (( ⊥ ‘𝑌) = 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑌))
5		eqcom 2740	. . 3 ⊢ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) = 𝑌 ↔ 𝑌 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))
6	3, 4, 5	3bitr4g 314	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (( ⊥ ‘𝑌) = 𝑋 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) = 𝑌))
7	6	bicomd 222	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) = 𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) = 𝑋))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ w3a 1088   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2107  ‘cfv 6544  Basecbs 17144  occoc 17205  OPcops 38042

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-ext 2704  ax-nul 5307

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1783  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-ne 2942  df-ral 3063  df-rab 3434  df-v 3477  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-uni 4910  df-br 5150  df-dm 5687  df-iota 6496  df-fv 6552  df-ov 7412  df-oposet 38046

This theorem is referenced by:  opoc0  38073