Theorem opcon1b 37212

Description: Orthocomplement contraposition law. (negcon1 11273 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
opoccl.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
opoccl.o	⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opcon1b	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) = 𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) = 𝑋))

Proof of Theorem opcon1b

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opoccl.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
2		opoccl.o	. . . 4 ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)
3	1, 2	opcon2b 37211	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ↔ 𝑌 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
4		eqcom 2745	. . 3 ⊢ (( ⊥ ‘𝑌) = 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑌))
5		eqcom 2745	. . 3 ⊢ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) = 𝑌 ↔ 𝑌 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))
6	3, 4, 5	3bitr4g 314	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (( ⊥ ‘𝑌) = 𝑋 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) = 𝑌))
7	6	bicomd 222	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) = 𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) = 𝑋))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106  ‘cfv 6433  Basecbs 16912  occoc 16970  OPcops 37186

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-nul 5230

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-br 5075  df-dm 5599  df-iota 6391  df-fv 6441  df-ov 7278  df-oposet 37190

This theorem is referenced by:  opoc0  37217