| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 388 of 507) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31307) |
(31308-32830) |
(32831-50694) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Syntax | cmaxidl 38701 | Extend class notation with the class of maximal ideals. |
| class MaxIdl | ||
| Definition | df-idl 38702* | Obsolete defintion, use df-2idl 21426 (or df-lidl 21369) instead. Define the class of (two-sided) ideals of a ring 𝑅. A subset of 𝑅 is an ideal if it contains 0, is closed under addition, and is closed under multiplication on either side by any element of 𝑅. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Idl = (𝑟 ∈ RingOps ↦ {𝑖 ∈ 𝒫 ran (1st ‘𝑟) ∣ ((GId‘(1st ‘𝑟)) ∈ 𝑖 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑖 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑖 (𝑥(1st ‘𝑟)𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1st ‘𝑟)((𝑧(2nd ‘𝑟)𝑥) ∈ 𝑖 ∧ (𝑥(2nd ‘𝑟)𝑧) ∈ 𝑖)))}) | ||
| Definition | df-pridl 38703* | Obsolete defintion, use df-prmidl 21498 instead. Define the class of prime ideals of a ring 𝑅. A proper ideal 𝐼 of 𝑅 is prime if whenever 𝐴𝐵 ⊆ 𝐼 for ideals 𝐴 and 𝐵, either 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐼 or 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐼. The more familiar definition using elements rather than ideals is equivalent provided 𝑅 is commutative; see ispridl2 38730 and ispridlc 38762. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ PrIdl = (𝑟 ∈ RingOps ↦ {𝑖 ∈ (Idl‘𝑟) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ ran (1st ‘𝑟) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (Idl‘𝑟)∀𝑏 ∈ (Idl‘𝑟)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥(2nd ‘𝑟)𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖)))}) | ||
| Definition | df-maxidl 38704* | Obsolete defintion, use df-mxidl 33774 instead. Define the class of maximal ideals of a ring 𝑅. A proper ideal is called maximal if it is maximal with respect to inclusion among proper ideals. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ MaxIdl = (𝑟 ∈ RingOps ↦ {𝑖 ∈ (Idl‘𝑟) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ ran (1st ‘𝑟) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑟)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = ran (1st ‘𝑟))))}) | ||
| Theorem | idlval 38705* | Obsolete theorem, use 2idlval 21427 instead. The class of ideals of a ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (Idl‘𝑅) = {𝑖 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑖 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑖 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑖 (𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑧𝐻𝑥) ∈ 𝑖 ∧ (𝑥𝐻𝑧) ∈ 𝑖)))}) | ||
| Theorem | isidl 38706* | Obsolete theorem, use df2idl2 21433 instead. The predicate "is an ideal of the ring 𝑅". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ↔ (𝐼 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑧𝐻𝑥) ∈ 𝐼 ∧ (𝑥𝐻𝑧) ∈ 𝐼))))) | ||
| Theorem | isidlc 38707* | Obsolete theorem, use df2idl2crng 21458 instead. The predicate "is an ideal of the commutative ring 𝑅". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ CRingOps → (𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ↔ (𝐼 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑧𝐻𝑥) ∈ 𝐼)))) | ||
| Theorem | idlss 38708 | Obsolete theorem, use 2idlss 21438 instead. An ideal of 𝑅 is a subset of 𝑅. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) → 𝐼 ⊆ 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | idlcl 38709 | Obsolete theorem, use 2idllidld 21430 and lidlbasel 21374 instead. An element of an ideal is an element of the ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | idl0cl 38710 | Obsolete theorem, use ringrng 20400 and rng2idl0 21443 instead. An ideal contains 0. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | idladdcl 38711 | Obsolete theorem, use 2idllidld 21430 and lidlacl 21383 instead. An ideal is closed under addition. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | idllmulcl 38712 | Obsolete theorem, use 2idllidld 21430 and lidlmcl 21387 instead. An ideal is closed under multiplication on the left. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐵𝐻𝐴) ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | idlrmulcl 38713 | Obsolete theorem, use 2idlridld 21431 and lidlmcl 21387 instead. An ideal is closed under multiplication on the right. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐻𝐵) ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | idlnegcl 38714 | Obsolete theorem, use 2idllidld 21430 and lidlnegcl 21384 instead. An ideal is closed under negation. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (inv‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑁‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | idlsubcl 38715 | Obsolete theorem, use 2idllidld 21430 and lidlsubcl 21386 instead. An ideal is closed under subtraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | rngoidl 38716 | Obsolete theorem, use 2idl1 21437 instead. A ring 𝑅 is an 𝑅 ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → 𝑋 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | 0idl 38717 | Obsolete theorem, use 2idl0 21436 instead. The set containing only 0 is an ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → {𝑍} ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | 1idl 38718 | Obsolete theorem, use 2idllidld 21430 and lidl1el 21388 instead. Two ways of expressing the unit ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ 𝐼 = 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | 0rngo 38719 | Obsolete theorem, use 0ring01eqbi2 20667 instead. In a ring, 0 = 1 iff the ring contains only 0. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝑍 = 𝑈 ↔ 𝑋 = {𝑍})) | ||
| Theorem | divrngidl 38720 | Obsolete theorem, use drngnidl 21414 instead. The only ideals in a division ring are the zero ideal and the unit ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ DivRingOps → (Idl‘𝑅) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) | ||
| Theorem | intidl 38721 | Obsolete theorem, use intlidl 33759 instead. The intersection of a nonempty collection of ideals is an ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ (Idl‘𝑅)) → ∩ 𝐶 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | inidl 38722 | Obsolete theorem, use inlidl 33760 instead. The intersection of two ideals is an ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 16-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝐽 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) → (𝐼 ∩ 𝐽) ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | unichnidl 38723* | Obsolete theorem, use unichnlidl 21399 instead. The union of a nonempty chain of ideals is an ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 ∨ 𝑗 ⊆ 𝑖))) → ∪ 𝐶 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | keridl 38724 | Obsolete theorem, use kerlidl 21454 instead. The kernel of a ring homomorphism is an ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 3-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑆 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 RingOpsHom 𝑆)) → (◡𝐹 “ {𝑍}) ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | pridlval 38725* | Obsolete theorem, use prmidlval 21499 instead. The class of prime ideals of a ring 𝑅. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (PrIdl‘𝑅) = {𝑖 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖)))}) | ||
| Theorem | ispridl 38726* | Obsolete theorem, use isprmidl 21500 instead. The predicate "is a prime ideal". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝑃 ∈ (PrIdl‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃))))) | ||
| Theorem | pridlidl 38727 | Obsolete theorem, use prmidlidl 21506 instead. A prime ideal is an ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (PrIdl‘𝑅)) → 𝑃 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | pridlnr 38728 | Obsolete theorem, use prmidlnr 21501 instead. A prime ideal is a proper ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (PrIdl‘𝑅)) → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | pridl 38729* | Obsolete theorem, use isprmidlc 21509 instead. The main property of a prime ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (PrIdl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∈ 𝑃)) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | ispridl2 38730* | Obsolete theorem, use prmidl2 21503 instead. A condition that shows an ideal is prime. For commutative rings, this is often taken to be the definition. See ispridlc 38762 for the equivalence in the commutative case. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑎𝐻𝑏) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)))) → 𝑃 ∈ (PrIdl‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | maxidlval 38731* | Obsolete theorem, use mxidlval 33775 instead. The set of maximal ideals of a ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (MaxIdl‘𝑅) = {𝑖 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))}) | ||
| Theorem | ismaxidl 38732* | Obsolete theorem, use ismxidl 33776 instead. The predicate "is a maximal ideal". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdl‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋))))) | ||
| Theorem | maxidlidl 38733 | Obsolete theorem, use mxidlidl 33777 instead. A maximal ideal is an ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdl‘𝑅)) → 𝑀 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | maxidlnr 38734 | Obsolete theorem, use mxidlnr 33778 instead. A maximal ideal is proper. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 16-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdl‘𝑅)) → 𝑀 ≠ 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | maxidlmax 38735 | Obsolete theorem, use mxidlmax 33779 instead. A maximal ideal is a maximal proper ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 16-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ⊆ 𝐼)) → (𝐼 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝐼 = 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | maxidln1 38736 | Obsolete theorem, use mxidln1 33780 instead. One is not contained in any maximal ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdl‘𝑅)) → ¬ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | maxidln0 38737 | Obsolete theorem, use mxidlnzr 33781 instead. A ring with a maximal ideal is not the zero ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdl‘𝑅)) → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑍) | ||
| Syntax | cprrng 38738 | Extend class notation with the class of prime rings. |
| class PrRing | ||
| Syntax | cdmn 38739 | Extend class notation with the class of domains. |
| class Dmn | ||
| Definition | df-prrngo 38740 | Obsolete definition, use df-prmring 49141 instead. Define the class of prime rings. A ring is prime if the zero ideal is a prime ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ PrRing = {𝑟 ∈ RingOps ∣ {(GId‘(1st ‘𝑟))} ∈ (PrIdl‘𝑟)} | ||
| Definition | df-dmn 38741 | Obsolete definition, use df-idom 20832 resp. dfidom2 49149 instead. Define the class of (integral) domains. A domain is a commutative prime ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Dmn = (PrRing ∩ Com2) | ||
| Theorem | isprrngo 38742 | Obsolete theorem, use isprmrng 49142 instead. The predicate "is a prime ring". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PrRing ↔ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ {𝑍} ∈ (PrIdl‘𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | prrngorngo 38743 | Obsolete theorem, use prmrngring 49144 instead. A prime ring is a ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PrRing → 𝑅 ∈ RingOps) | ||
| Theorem | smprngopr 38744 | Obsolete theorem, use smprngprmrng 49145 instead. A simple ring (one whose only ideals are 0 and 𝑅) is a prime ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝑅) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) → 𝑅 ∈ PrRing) | ||
| Theorem | divrngpr 38745 | Obsolete theorem, use drngprmrng 49146 instead. A division ring is a prime ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ DivRingOps → 𝑅 ∈ PrRing) | ||
| Theorem | isdmn 38746 | Obsolete theorem, use isidom2 49150 instead. The predicate "is a domain". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Dmn ↔ (𝑅 ∈ PrRing ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Com2)) | ||
| Theorem | isdmn2 38747 | Obsolete theorem, use isidom2 49150 instead. The predicate "is a domain". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Dmn ↔ (𝑅 ∈ PrRing ∧ 𝑅 ∈ CRingOps)) | ||
| Theorem | dmncrng 38748 | Obsolete theorem, use idomcringd 20862 instead. A domain is a commutative ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Dmn → 𝑅 ∈ CRingOps) | ||
| Theorem | dmnrngo 38749 | Obsolete theorem, use idomringd 20863 instead. A domain is a ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Dmn → 𝑅 ∈ RingOps) | ||
| Theorem | flddmn 38750 | Obsolete theorem, use fldidom 20912 instead. A field is a domain. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld → 𝐾 ∈ Dmn) | ||
| Syntax | cigen 38751 | Extend class notation with the ideal generation function. |
| class IdlGen | ||
| Definition | df-igen 38752* | Obsolete definition, use df-rsp 21370 instead. Define the ideal generated by a subset of a ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ IdlGen = (𝑟 ∈ RingOps, 𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 ran (1st ‘𝑟) ↦ ∩ {𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑟) ∣ 𝑠 ⊆ 𝑗}) | ||
| Theorem | igenval 38753* | Obsolete theorem, use rspvalint 21406 instead. The ideal generated by a subset of a ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑅 IdlGen 𝑆) = ∩ {𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∣ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑗}) | ||
| Theorem | igenss 38754 | Obsolete theorem, use rspssid 21402 instead. A set is a subset of the ideal it generates. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑅 IdlGen 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | igenidl 38755 | Obsolete theorem, use rspcl 21401 instead. The ideal generated by a set is an ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑅 IdlGen 𝑆) ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | igenmin 38756 | Obsolete theorem, use rspssp 21405 instead. The ideal generated by a set is the minimal ideal containing that set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐼) → (𝑅 IdlGen 𝑆) ⊆ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | igenidl2 38757 | Obsolete theorem, use rspidlid 33720 instead. The ideal generated by an ideal is that ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) → (𝑅 IdlGen 𝐼) = 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | igenval2 38758* | Obsolete theorem, use rspprop 21407 instead. The ideal generated by a subset of a ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → ((𝑅 IdlGen 𝑆) = 𝐼 ↔ (𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑆 ⊆ 𝑗 → 𝐼 ⊆ 𝑗)))) | ||
| Theorem | prnc 38759* | Obsolete theorem, use rspsn0 21409 instead (holds for arbitrary rings). A principal ideal (an ideal generated by one element) in a commutative ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑅 IdlGen {𝐴}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 𝑥 = (𝑦𝐻𝐴)}) | ||
| Theorem | isfldidl 38760 | Obsolete theorem, use isfieldidl 21423 instead. Determine if a ring is a field based on its ideals. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})) | ||
| Theorem | isfldidl2 38761 | Obsolete theorem, use isfieldidl2 21424 instead. Determine if a ring is a field based on its ideals. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})) | ||
| Theorem | ispridlc 38762* | Obsolete theorem, use isprmidlc 21509 instead. The predicate "is a prime ideal". Alternate definition for commutative rings. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ CRingOps → (𝑃 ∈ (PrIdl‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑎𝐻𝑏) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃))))) | ||
| Theorem | pridlc 38763 | Obsolete theorem, use prmidlc 21510 instead. Property of a prime ideal in a commutative ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (PrIdl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴𝐻𝐵) ∈ 𝑃)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑃 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | pridlc2 38764 | Obsolete theorem, use prmidlc2 21511 instead. Property of a prime ideal in a commutative ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (PrIdl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑋 ∖ 𝑃) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴𝐻𝐵) ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | pridlc3 38765 | Obsolete theorem, use cmprmidlmcl 21512 instead. Property of a prime ideal in a commutative ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (PrIdl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑋 ∖ 𝑃) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑋 ∖ 𝑃))) → (𝐴𝐻𝐵) ∈ (𝑋 ∖ 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | isdmn3 38766* | Obsolete theorem, use isidom3 49151 instead. The predicate "is a domain", alternate expression. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Dmn ↔ (𝑅 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑍 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑎𝐻𝑏) = 𝑍 → (𝑎 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑍)))) | ||
| Theorem | dmnnzd 38767 | Obsolete theorem, use idomnzd 49152 instead. A domain has no zero-divisors (besides zero). (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Dmn ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴𝐻𝐵) = 𝑍)) → (𝐴 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | dmncan1 38768 | Obsolete theorem, use idomcanl 49153 instead. Cancellation law for domains. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ Dmn ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝑍) → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵) = (𝐴𝐻𝐶) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | dmncan2 38769 | Obsolete theorem, use idomcanr 49154 instead. Cancellation law for domains. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ Dmn ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑍) → ((𝐴𝐻𝐶) = (𝐵𝐻𝐶) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
The results in this section are mostly meant for being used by automatic proof building programs. As a result, they might appear less useful or meaningful than others to human beings. | ||
| Theorem | efald2 38770 | A proof by contradiction. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ⊥) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | notbinot1 38771 | Simplification rule of negation across a biconditional. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (¬ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | bicontr 38772 | Biconditional of its own negation is a contradiction. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) ↔ ⊥) | ||
| Theorem | impor 38773 | An equivalent formula for implying a disjunction. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) ↔ ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | orfa 38774 | The falsum ⊥ can be removed from a disjunction. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ ⊥) ↔ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | notbinot2 38775 | Commutation rule between negation and biconditional. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | biimpor 38776 | A rewriting rule for biconditional. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ((¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | orfa1 38777 | Add a contradicting disjunct to an antecedent. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ ⊥) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | orfa2 38778 | Remove a contradicting disjunct from an antecedent. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊥) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | bifald 38779 | Infer the equivalence to a contradiction from a negation, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ ⊥)) | ||
| Theorem | cnf1dd 38780 | A lemma for Conjunctive Normal Form unit propagation, in double deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | cnf2dd 38781 | A lemma for Conjunctive Normal Form unit propagation, in double deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cnfn1dd 38782 | A lemma for Conjunctive Normal Form unit propagation, in double deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (¬ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | cnfn2dd 38783 | A lemma for Conjunctive Normal Form unit propagation, in double deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ∨ ¬ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | or32dd 38784 | A rearrangement of disjuncts, in double deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜃) ∨ 𝜏))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ∨ 𝜃))) | ||
| Theorem | notornotel1 38785 | A lemma for not-or-not elimination, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (¬ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | notornotel2 38786 | A lemma for not-or-not elimination, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜓 ∨ ¬ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | contrd 38787 | A proof by contradiction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | an12i 38788 | An inference from commuting operands in a chain of conjunctions. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 22-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | exmid2 38789 | An excluded middle law. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 23-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((¬ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | selconj 38790 | An inference for selecting one of a list of conjuncts. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 23-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜂 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | truconj 38791 | Add true as a conjunct. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 23-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (⊤ ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | orel 38792 | An inference for disjunction elimination. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜌) → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜂 ∧ 𝜌)) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | negel 38793 | An inference for negation elimination. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ⊥) | ||
| Theorem | botel 38794 | An inference for bottom elimination. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | tradd 38795 | Add top ad a conjunct. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (⊤ ∧ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | gm-sbtru 38796 | Substitution does not change truth. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]⊤ ↔ ⊤) | ||
| Theorem | sbfal 38797 | Substitution does not change falsity. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]⊥ ↔ ⊥) | ||
| Theorem | sbcani 38798 | Distribution of class substitution over conjunction, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 27-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) & ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcori 38799 | Distribution of class substitution over disjunction, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 27-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) & ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜂)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcimi 38800 | Distribution of class substitution over implication, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 27-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) & ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 → 𝜂)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |