| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 388 of 512) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31525) |
(31526-33048) |
(33049-51158) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | itggt0cn 38701* | itggt0 26169 holds for continuous functions in the absence of ax-cc 10516. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 16-Nov-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 < 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑋(,)𝑌) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐿1) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑋(,)𝑌)) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑋(,)𝑌) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ((𝑋(,)𝑌)–cn→ℂ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < ∫(𝑋(,)𝑌)𝐵 d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | ftc1cnnclem 38702* | Lemma for ftc1cnnc 38703; cf. ftc1lem4 26364. The stronger assumptions of ftc1cn 26368 are exploited to make use of weaker theorems. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 19-Nov-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ↦ ∫(𝐴(,)𝑥)(𝐹‘𝑡) d𝑡) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐴(,)𝐵)–cn→ℂ)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐿1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑐 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑧 ∈ ((𝐴[,]𝐵) ∖ {𝑐}) ↦ (((𝐺‘𝑧) − (𝐺‘𝑐)) / (𝑧 − 𝑐))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵)) → ((abs‘(𝑦 − 𝑐)) < 𝑅 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑦) − (𝐹‘𝑐))) < 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝑐)) < 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑌 − 𝑐)) < 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → (abs‘((((𝐺‘𝑌) − (𝐺‘𝑋)) / (𝑌 − 𝑋)) − (𝐹‘𝑐))) < 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | ftc1cnnc 38703* | Choice-free proof of ftc1cn 26368. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 20-Nov-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ↦ ∫(𝐴(,)𝑥)(𝐹‘𝑡) d𝑡) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐴(,)𝐵)–cn→ℂ)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐿1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℝ D 𝐺) = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | ftc1anclem1 38704 | Lemma for ftc1anc 38712- the absolute value of a real-valued measurable function is measurable. Would be trivial with cncombf 25984, but this proof avoids ax-cc 10516. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 18-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ MblFn) → (abs ∘ 𝐹) ∈ MblFn) | ||
| Theorem | ftc1anclem2 38705* | Lemma for ftc1anc 38712- restriction of an integrable function to the absolute value of its real or imaginary part. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 19-Jun-2018.) (Revised by Brendan Leahy, 8-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐿1 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ {ℜ, ℑ}) → (∫2‘(𝑡 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑡 ∈ 𝐴, (abs‘(𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑡))), 0))) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | ftc1anclem3 38706 | Lemma for ftc1anc 38712- the absolute value of the sum of a simple function and i times another simple function is itself a simple function. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 27-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1) → (abs ∘ (𝐹 ∘f + ((ℝ × {i}) ∘f · 𝐺))) ∈ dom ∫1) | ||
| Theorem | ftc1anclem4 38707* | Lemma for ftc1anc 38712. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 17-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐿1 ∧ 𝐺:ℝ⟶ℝ) → (∫2‘(𝑡 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((𝐺‘𝑡) − (𝐹‘𝑡))))) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | ftc1anclem5 38708* | Lemma for ftc1anc 38712, the existence of a simple function the integral of whose pointwise difference from the function is less than a given positive real. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 17-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ↦ ∫(𝐴(,)𝑥)(𝐹‘𝑡) d𝑡) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(,)𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐿1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐷⟶ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑓 ∈ dom ∫1(∫2‘(𝑡 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((ℜ‘if(𝑡 ∈ 𝐷, (𝐹‘𝑡), 0)) − (𝑓‘𝑡))))) < 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | ftc1anclem6 38709* | Lemma for ftc1anc 38712- construction of simple functions within an arbitrary absolute distance of the given function. Similar to Lemma 565Ib of [Fremlin5] p. 218, but without Fremlin's additional step of converting the simple function into a continuous one, which is unnecessary to this lemma's use; also, two simple functions are used to allow for complex-valued 𝐹. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 31-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ↦ ∫(𝐴(,)𝑥)(𝐹‘𝑡) d𝑡) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(,)𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐿1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐷⟶ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑓 ∈ dom ∫1∃𝑔 ∈ dom ∫1(∫2‘(𝑡 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘(if(𝑡 ∈ 𝐷, (𝐹‘𝑡), 0) − ((𝑓‘𝑡) + (i · (𝑔‘𝑡))))))) < 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | ftc1anclem7 38710* | Lemma for ftc1anc 38712. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 13-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ↦ ∫(𝐴(,)𝑥)(𝐹‘𝑡) d𝑡) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(,)𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐿1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐷⟶ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (((((((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓 ∈ dom ∫1 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ dom ∫1)) ∧ (∫2‘(𝑡 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘(if(𝑡 ∈ 𝐷, (𝐹‘𝑡), 0) − ((𝑓‘𝑡) + (i · (𝑔‘𝑡))))))) < (𝑦 / 2)) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ (ran 𝑓 ∪ ran 𝑔)𝑟 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∧ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑤)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑤 − 𝑢)) < ((𝑦 / 2) / (2 · sup((abs “ (ran 𝑓 ∪ ran 𝑔)), ℝ, < )))) → ((∫2‘(𝑡 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑡 ∈ (𝑢(,)𝑤), (abs‘((𝑓‘𝑡) + (i · (𝑔‘𝑡)))), 0))) + (∫2‘(𝑡 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑡 ∈ (𝑢(,)𝑤), (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑡) − ((𝑓‘𝑡) + (i · (𝑔‘𝑡))))), 0)))) < ((𝑦 / 2) + (𝑦 / 2))) | ||
| Theorem | ftc1anclem8 38711* | Lemma for ftc1anc 38712. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 29-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ↦ ∫(𝐴(,)𝑥)(𝐹‘𝑡) d𝑡) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(,)𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐿1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐷⟶ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (((((((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓 ∈ dom ∫1 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ dom ∫1)) ∧ (∫2‘(𝑡 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘(if(𝑡 ∈ 𝐷, (𝐹‘𝑡), 0) − ((𝑓‘𝑡) + (i · (𝑔‘𝑡))))))) < (𝑦 / 2)) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ (ran 𝑓 ∪ ran 𝑔)𝑟 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∧ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑤)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑤 − 𝑢)) < ((𝑦 / 2) / (2 · sup((abs “ (ran 𝑓 ∪ ran 𝑔)), ℝ, < )))) → (∫2‘(𝑡 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑡 ∈ (𝑢(,)𝑤), ((abs‘((𝐹‘𝑡) − ((𝑓‘𝑡) + (i · (𝑔‘𝑡))))) + (abs‘((𝑓‘𝑡) + (i · (𝑔‘𝑡))))), 0))) < 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | ftc1anc 38712* | ftc1a 26362 holds for functions that obey the triangle inequality in the absence of ax-cc 10516. Theorem 565Ma of [Fremlin5] p. 220. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 11-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ↦ ∫(𝐴(,)𝑥)(𝐹‘𝑡) d𝑡) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(,)𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐿1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐷⟶ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ ((,) “ ((𝐴[,]𝐵) × (𝐴[,]𝐵)))(abs‘∫𝑠(𝐹‘𝑡) d𝑡) ≤ (∫2‘(𝑡 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑡 ∈ 𝑠, (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑡)), 0)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((𝐴[,]𝐵)–cn→ℂ)) | ||
| Theorem | ftc2nc 38713* | Choice-free proof of ftc2 26369. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 19-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℝ D 𝐹) ∈ ((𝐴(,)𝐵)–cn→ℂ)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℝ D 𝐹) ∈ 𝐿1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐴[,]𝐵)–cn→ℂ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫(𝐴(,)𝐵)((ℝ D 𝐹)‘𝑡) d𝑡 = ((𝐹‘𝐵) − (𝐹‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | asindmre 38714 | Real part of domain of differentiability of arcsine. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 19-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐷 = (ℂ ∖ ((-∞(,] -1) ∪ (1[,)+∞))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐷 ∩ ℝ) = ( -1(,)1) | ||
| Theorem | dvasin 38715* | Derivative of arcsine. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 18-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐷 = (ℂ ∖ ((-∞(,] -1) ∪ (1[,)+∞))) ⇒ ⊢ (ℂ D (arcsin ↾ 𝐷)) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (1 / (√‘(1 − (𝑥↑2))))) | ||
| Theorem | dvacos 38716* | Derivative of arccosine. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 18-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐷 = (ℂ ∖ ((-∞(,] -1) ∪ (1[,)+∞))) ⇒ ⊢ (ℂ D (arccos ↾ 𝐷)) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ ( -1 / (√‘(1 − (𝑥↑2))))) | ||
| Theorem | dvreasin 38717 | Real derivative of arcsine. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 3-Aug-2017.) (Proof shortened by Brendan Leahy, 18-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (ℝ D (arcsin ↾ ( -1(,)1))) = (𝑥 ∈ ( -1(,)1) ↦ (1 / (√‘(1 − (𝑥↑2))))) | ||
| Theorem | dvreacos 38718 | Real derivative of arccosine. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 3-Aug-2017.) (Proof shortened by Brendan Leahy, 18-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (ℝ D (arccos ↾ ( -1(,)1))) = (𝑥 ∈ ( -1(,)1) ↦ ( -1 / (√‘(1 − (𝑥↑2))))) | ||
| Theorem | areacirclem1 38719* | Antiderivative of cross-section of circle. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 28-Aug-2017.) (Revised by Brendan Leahy, 11-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ ℝ+ → (ℝ D (𝑡 ∈ ( -𝑅(,)𝑅) ↦ ((𝑅↑2) · ((arcsin‘(𝑡 / 𝑅)) + ((𝑡 / 𝑅) · (√‘(1 − ((𝑡 / 𝑅)↑2)))))))) = (𝑡 ∈ ( -𝑅(,)𝑅) ↦ (2 · (√‘((𝑅↑2) − (𝑡↑2)))))) | ||
| Theorem | areacirclem2 38720* | Endpoint-inclusive continuity of Cartesian ordinate of circle. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 29-Aug-2017.) (Revised by Brendan Leahy, 11-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑅) → (𝑡 ∈ ( -𝑅[,]𝑅) ↦ (√‘((𝑅↑2) − (𝑡↑2)))) ∈ (( -𝑅[,]𝑅)–cn→ℂ)) | ||
| Theorem | areacirclem3 38721* | Integrability of cross-section of circle. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 26-Aug-2017.) (Revised by Brendan Leahy, 11-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑅) → (𝑡 ∈ ( -𝑅[,]𝑅) ↦ (2 · (√‘((𝑅↑2) − (𝑡↑2))))) ∈ 𝐿1) | ||
| Theorem | areacirclem4 38722* | Endpoint-inclusive continuity of antiderivative of cross-section of circle. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 31-Aug-2017.) (Revised by Brendan Leahy, 11-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ ℝ+ → (𝑡 ∈ ( -𝑅[,]𝑅) ↦ ((𝑅↑2) · ((arcsin‘(𝑡 / 𝑅)) + ((𝑡 / 𝑅) · (√‘(1 − ((𝑡 / 𝑅)↑2))))))) ∈ (( -𝑅[,]𝑅)–cn→ℂ)) | ||
| Theorem | areacirclem5 38723* | Finding the cross-section of a circle. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 31-Aug-2017.) (Revised by Brendan Leahy, 22-Sep-2017.) (Revised by Brendan Leahy, 11-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) ≤ (𝑅↑2))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ ℝ) → (𝑆 “ {𝑡}) = if((abs‘𝑡) ≤ 𝑅, ( -(√‘((𝑅↑2) − (𝑡↑2)))[,](√‘((𝑅↑2) − (𝑡↑2)))), ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | areacirc 38724* | The area of a circle of radius 𝑅 is π · 𝑅↑2. This is Metamath 100 proof #9. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 31-Aug-2017.) (Revised by Brendan Leahy, 22-Sep-2017.) (Revised by Brendan Leahy, 11-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) ≤ (𝑅↑2))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑅) → (area‘𝑆) = (π · (𝑅↑2))) | ||
| Theorem | findcard4 38725* | Schema for strong induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive hypothesis is that the result is true on any set with less elements. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Thomas van Maaren, 14-Aug-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Fin → (∀𝑥((♯‘𝑥) < (♯‘𝑦) → 𝜑) → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏) | ||
Sentences of propositional calculus are encoded as sequences of nonnegative integers. Variables are encoded as (propvar ‘𝑛) where 𝑛 is a natural number. The negation of a sentence of propositional calculus 𝑥 is encoded as (prop¬‘𝑥). Two sentences of propositional calculus 𝑥 and 𝑦 can be combined using the implication prop→. To avoid the necessity of brackets, this is done in an RPN-format. We can thus encode the sentence "𝑥 implies 𝑦 " as (𝑥prop→𝑦). | ||
| Syntax | cpropvar 38726 | A variable in a sentence of propositional calculus. |
| class propvar | ||
| Syntax | cpropneg 38727 | The negation of a sentence of propositional calculus. |
| class prop¬ | ||
| Syntax | cpropimp 38728 | The implication between two sentences of propositional calculus. |
| class prop→ | ||
| Definition | df-propvar 38729 | Variables in sentences of propositional calculus are encoded by appending a zero after the number of the variable. (Contributed by Thomas van Maaren, 21-Aug-2026.) |
| ⊢ propvar = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (〈“𝑛”〉 ++ 〈“0”〉)) | ||
| Definition | df-propneg 38730 | The negation of a sentence of propositional calculus is encoded by appending a one after the sentence. (Contributed by Thomas van Maaren, 21-Aug-2026.) |
| ⊢ prop¬ = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ++ 〈“1”〉)) | ||
| Definition | df-propimp 38731* | The implication between two sentences of propositional calculus is encoded by concatenating the two sentences and appending a two at the end. (Contributed by Thomas van Maaren, 21-Aug-2026.) |
| ⊢ prop→ = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑥 ++ 𝑦) ++ 〈“2”〉)) | ||
| Syntax | cprop 38732 | The language of Propositional Calculus. |
| class PROP | ||
| Definition | df-prop 38733* | Define the language of propositional calculus. This definition is noncircular. For a more usable and intuitive, but circular, definition see dfprop 38740. (Contributed by Thomas van Maaren, 21-Aug-2026.) |
| ⊢ PROP = setrecs((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑥 = (prop¬‘𝑧) ∨ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 𝑥 = (𝑤prop→𝑧)) ∨ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝑥 = (propvar ‘𝑛))})) | ||
| Theorem | dfproplem 38734* | Given a set A, the set of all variables encoded as natural numbers, negations of elements in A, and implications between elements of A forms a set. This lemma is used when using fvmptd 7001 on the defining function of PROP. (Contributed by Thomas van Maaren, 21-Aug-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = (prop¬‘𝑧) ∨ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑤prop→𝑧)) ∨ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝑥 = (propvar ‘𝑛))} ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | varprop 38735 | Variables encoded as natural numbers are sentences of propositional calculus. (Contributed by Thomas van Maaren, 21-Aug-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ → (propvar ‘𝑛) ∈ PROP) | ||
| Theorem | negprop 38736 | The negation of a sentence of propositional calculus is a sentence of propositional calculus. (Contributed by Thomas van Maaren, 21-Aug-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ PROP → (prop¬‘𝑥) ∈ PROP) | ||
| Theorem | impprop 38737 | The implication between two sentences of propositional calculus is a sentence of propositional calculus. (Contributed by Thomas van Maaren, 21-Aug-2026.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ PROP ∧ 𝑦 ∈ PROP) → (𝑥prop→𝑦) ∈ PROP) | ||
| Theorem | dfprop1 38738* | The set of variables encoded as a natural number, negations of sentences of propositional calculus, and implications between sentences of propositional calculus is a subset of PROP. (Contributed by Thomas van Maaren, 21-Aug-2026.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑧 ∈ PROP (𝑥 = (prop¬‘𝑧) ∨ ∃𝑤 ∈ PROP 𝑥 = (𝑤prop→𝑧)) ∨ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝑥 = (propvar ‘𝑛))} ⊆ PROP | ||
| Theorem | dfprop2 38739* | Every sentence of propositional calculus is either a variable encoded as a natural number, a negation of a sentence of propositional calculus, or an implication between two sentences of propositional calculus. (Contributed by Thomas van Maaren, 21-Aug-2026.) |
| ⊢ PROP ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑧 ∈ PROP (𝑥 = (prop¬‘𝑧) ∨ ∃𝑤 ∈ PROP 𝑥 = (𝑤prop→𝑧)) ∨ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝑥 = (propvar ‘𝑛))} | ||
| Theorem | dfprop 38740* | The set of sentences of propositional calculus is equal to the set of sentences that are either a variable encoded as a natural number, a negation of a sentence propositional calculus, or an implication between two sentences of propositional calculus. (Contributed by Thomas van Maaren, 21-Aug-2026.) |
| ⊢ PROP = {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑧 ∈ PROP (𝑥 = (prop¬‘𝑧) ∨ ∃𝑤 ∈ PROP 𝑥 = (𝑤prop→𝑧)) ∨ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝑥 = (propvar ‘𝑛))} | ||
| Theorem | unirep 38741* | Define a quantity whose definition involves a choice of representative, but which is uniquely determined regardless of the choice. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐷 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐷 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝐵 = 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝐵 = 𝐹) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) → (℩𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵)) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cover2 38742* | Two ways of expressing the statement "there is a cover of 𝐴 by elements of 𝐵 such that for each set in the cover, 𝜑". Note that 𝜑 and 𝑥 must be distinct. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2010.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵(∪ 𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | cover2g 38743* | Two ways of expressing the statement "there is a cover of 𝐴 by elements of 𝐵 such that for each set in the cover, 𝜑". Note that 𝜑 and 𝑥 must be distinct. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 21-Jun-2010.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵(∪ 𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | brabg2 38744* | Relation by a binary relation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | opelopab3 38745* | Ordered pair membership in an ordered pair class abstraction, with a reduced hypothesis. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 29-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cocanfo 38746 | Cancellation of a surjective function from the right side of a composition. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵) ∧ (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)) → 𝐺 = 𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | brresi2 38747 | Restriction of a binary relation. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | fnopabeqd 38748* | Equality deduction for function abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)} = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶)}) | ||
| Theorem | fvopabf4g 38749* | Function value of an operator abstraction whose domain is a set of functions with given domain and range. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Dec-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝐷) ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐴:𝐷⟶𝑅) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fnopabco 38750* | Composition of a function with a function abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)} & ⊢ 𝐺 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘𝐵))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 Fn 𝐶 → 𝐺 = (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | opropabco 38751* | Composition of an operator with a function abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉)} & ⊢ 𝐺 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐵𝑀𝐶))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 Fn (𝑅 × 𝑆) → 𝐺 = (𝑀 ∘ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | cocnv 38752 | Composition with a function and then with the converse. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∘ ◡𝐺) = (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | f1ocan1fv 38753 | Cancel a composition by a bijection by preapplying the converse. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘(◡𝐺‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | f1ocan2fv 38754 | Cancel a composition by the converse of a bijection by preapplying the bijection. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘ ◡𝐺)‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | inixp 38755* | Intersection of Cartesian products over the same base set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∩ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | upixp 38756* | Universal property of the indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = X𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶‘𝑏) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑥‘𝑤))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑎):𝐵⟶(𝐶‘𝑎)) → ∃!ℎ(ℎ:𝐵⟶𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑎) = ((𝑃‘𝑎) ∘ ℎ))) | ||
| Theorem | abrexdom 38757* | An indexed set is dominated by the indexing set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃*𝑥𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ≼ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | abrexdom2 38758* | An indexed set is dominated by the indexing set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵} ≼ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ac6gf 38759* | Axiom of Choice. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | indexa 38760* | If for every element of an indexing set 𝐴 there exists a corresponding element of another set 𝐵, then there exists a subset of 𝐵 consisting only of those elements which are indexed by 𝐴. Used to avoid the Axiom of Choice in situations where only the range of the choice function is needed. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → ∃𝑐(𝑐 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑐 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑐 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | indexdom 38761* | If for every element of an indexing set 𝐴 there exists a corresponding element of another set 𝐵, then there exists a subset of 𝐵 consisting only of those elements which are indexed by 𝐴, and which is dominated by the set 𝐴. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → ∃𝑐((𝑐 ≼ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑐 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑐 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑐 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | frinfm 38762* | A subset of a well-founded set has an infimum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥◡𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦◡𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝑅𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | welb 38763* | A nonempty subset of a well-ordered set has a lower bound. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → (◡𝑅 Or 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥◡𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦◡𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝑅𝑧)))) | ||
| Theorem | supex2g 38764 | Existence of supremum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | supclt 38765* | Closure of supremum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | supubt 38766* | Upper bound property of supremum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | filbcmb 38767* | Combine a finite set of lower bounds. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝜑) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | fzmul 38768 | Membership of a product in a finite interval of integers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2010.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐽 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁) → (𝐾 · 𝐽) ∈ ((𝐾 · 𝑀)...(𝐾 · 𝑁)))) | ||
| Theorem | sdclem2 38769* | Lemma for sdc 38771. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝑔 = (𝑓 ↾ (𝑀...𝑛)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑀 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑘 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ ((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑛 = (𝑘 + 1)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜎)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔(𝑔:{𝑀}⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝜏)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → ((𝑔:(𝑀...𝑘)⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝜃) → ∃ℎ(ℎ:(𝑀...(𝑘 + 1))⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 = (ℎ ↾ (𝑀...𝑘)) ∧ 𝜎))) & ⊢ 𝐽 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 (𝑔:(𝑀...𝑛)⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑤 ∈ 𝑍, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 (ℎ:(𝑀...(𝑘 + 1))⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (ℎ ↾ (𝑀...𝑘)) ∧ 𝜎)}) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑍⟶𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑀):(𝑀...𝑀)⟶𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘(𝑤 + 1)) ∈ (𝑤𝐹(𝐺‘𝑤))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑍⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | sdclem1 38770* | Lemma for sdc 38771. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝑔 = (𝑓 ↾ (𝑀...𝑛)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑀 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑘 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ ((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑛 = (𝑘 + 1)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜎)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔(𝑔:{𝑀}⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝜏)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → ((𝑔:(𝑀...𝑘)⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝜃) → ∃ℎ(ℎ:(𝑀...(𝑘 + 1))⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 = (ℎ ↾ (𝑀...𝑘)) ∧ 𝜎))) & ⊢ 𝐽 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 (𝑔:(𝑀...𝑛)⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑤 ∈ 𝑍, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 (ℎ:(𝑀...(𝑘 + 1))⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (ℎ ↾ (𝑀...𝑘)) ∧ 𝜎)}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑍⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | sdc 38771* | Strong dependent choice. Suppose we may choose an element of 𝐴 such that property 𝜓 holds, and suppose that if we have already chosen the first 𝑘 elements (represented here by a function from 1...𝑘 to 𝐴), we may choose another element so that all 𝑘 + 1 elements taken together have property 𝜓. Then there exists an infinite sequence of elements of 𝐴 such that the first 𝑛 terms of this sequence satisfy 𝜓 for all 𝑛. This theorem allows to construct infinite sequences where each term depends on all the previous terms in the sequence. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝑔 = (𝑓 ↾ (𝑀...𝑛)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑀 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑘 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ ((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑛 = (𝑘 + 1)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜎)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔(𝑔:{𝑀}⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝜏)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → ((𝑔:(𝑀...𝑘)⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝜃) → ∃ℎ(ℎ:(𝑀...(𝑘 + 1))⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 = (ℎ ↾ (𝑀...𝑘)) ∧ 𝜎))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑍⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | fdc 38772* | Finite version of dependent choice. Construct a function whose value depends on the previous function value, except at a final point at which no new value can be chosen. The final hypothesis ensures that the process will terminate. The proof does not use the Axiom of Choice. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 18-Jun-2010.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑀 + 1) & ⊢ (𝑎 = (𝑓‘(𝑘 − 1)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = (𝑓‘𝑘) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = (𝑓‘𝑛) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜃 ∨ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) & ⊢ (((𝜂 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑏𝑅𝑎) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜂 → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(𝑀...𝑛)⟶𝐴 ∧ ((𝑓‘𝑀) = 𝐶 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (𝑁...𝑛)𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | fdc1 38773* | Variant of fdc 38772 with no specified base value. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 18-Jun-2010.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑀 + 1) & ⊢ (𝑎 = (𝑓‘𝑀) → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜎)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = (𝑓‘(𝑘 − 1)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = (𝑓‘𝑘) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = (𝑓‘𝑛) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜂 → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝜁) & ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜃 ∨ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) & ⊢ (((𝜂 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑏𝑅𝑎) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜂 → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(𝑀...𝑛)⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝜎 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (𝑁...𝑛)𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | seqpo 38774* | Two ways to say that a sequence respects a partial order. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹:ℕ⟶𝐴) → (∀𝑠 ∈ ℕ (𝐹‘𝑠)𝑅(𝐹‘(𝑠 + 1)) ↔ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑚 + 1))(𝐹‘𝑚)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑛))) | ||
| Theorem | incsequz 38775* | An increasing sequence of positive integers takes on indefinitely large values. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:ℕ⟶ℕ ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝐹‘𝑚) < (𝐹‘(𝑚 + 1)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ (𝐹‘𝑛) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | incsequz2 38776* | An increasing sequence of positive integers takes on indefinitely large values. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:ℕ⟶ℕ ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝐹‘𝑚) < (𝐹‘(𝑚 + 1)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)(𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | nnubfi 38777* | A bounded above set of positive integers is finite. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 < 𝐵} ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | nninfnub 38778* | An infinite set of positive integers is unbounded above. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐵 < 𝑥} ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | subspopn 38779 | An open set is open in the subspace topology. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐽 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)) → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | neificl 38780 | Neighborhoods are closed under finite intersection. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑁 ⊆ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑁 ≠ ∅)) → ∩ 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | lpss2 38781 | Limit points of a subset are limit points of the larger set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → ((limPt‘𝐽)‘𝐵) ⊆ ((limPt‘𝐽)‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | metf1o 38782* | Use a bijection with a metric space to construct a metric on a set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑀(𝐹‘𝑦))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹:𝑌–1-1-onto→𝑋) → 𝑁 ∈ (Met‘𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | blssp 38783 | A ball in the subspace metric. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑀 ↾ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)) → (𝑌(ball‘𝑁)𝑅) = ((𝑌(ball‘𝑀)𝑅) ∩ 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | mettrifi 38784* | Generalized triangle inequality for arbitrary finite sums. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝑀)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑁)) ≤ Σ𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...(𝑁 − 1))((𝐹‘𝑘)𝐷(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)))) | ||
| Theorem | lmclim2 38785* | A sequence in a metric space converges to a point iff the distance between the point and the elements of the sequence converges to 0. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶𝑋) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐷𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(⇝𝑡‘𝐽)𝑌 ↔ 𝐺 ⇝ 0)) | ||
| Theorem | geomcau 38786* | If the distance between consecutive points in a sequence is bounded by a geometric sequence, then the sequence is Cauchy. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 1) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐹‘𝑘)𝐷(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (𝐵↑𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Cau‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | caures 38787 | The restriction of a Cauchy sequence to an upper set of integers is Cauchy. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋 ↑pm ℂ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (Cau‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐹 ↾ 𝑍) ∈ (Cau‘𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | caushft 38788* | A shifted Cauchy sequence is Cauchy. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 𝑁))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Cau‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑊⟶𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (Cau‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | constcncf 38789* | A constant function is a continuous function on ℂ. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Moved into main set.mm as cncfmptc 25238 and may be deleted by mathbox owner, JM. --MC 12-Sep-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → 𝐹 ∈ (ℂ–cn→ℂ)) | ||
| Theorem | cnres2 38790* | The restriction of a continuous function to a subset is continuous. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽 & ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾 ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐾 ∈ Top) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑌) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ ((𝐽 ↾t 𝐴) Cn (𝐾 ↾t 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | cnresima 38791 | A continuous function is continuous onto its image. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐾 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐽 Cn (𝐾 ↾t ran 𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | cncfres 38792* | A continuous function on complex numbers restricted to a subset. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ (ℂ–cn→ℂ) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (MetOpen‘((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (𝐵 × 𝐵))) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾) | ||
| Syntax | ctotbnd 38793 | Extend class notation with the class of totally bounded metric spaces. |
| class TotBnd | ||
| Syntax | cbnd 38794 | Extend class notation with the class of bounded metric spaces. |
| class Bnd | ||
| Definition | df-totbnd 38795* | Define the class of totally bounded metrics. A metric space is totally bounded iff it can be covered by a finite number of balls of any given radius. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ TotBnd = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑚 ∈ (Met‘𝑥) ∣ ∀𝑑 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑣 ∈ Fin (∪ 𝑣 = 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑣 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝑏 = (𝑦(ball‘𝑚)𝑑))}) | ||
| Theorem | istotbnd 38796* | The predicate "is a totally bounded metric space". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑋) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑣 ∈ Fin (∪ 𝑣 = 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑣 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑏 = (𝑥(ball‘𝑀)𝑑)))) | ||
| Theorem | istotbnd2 38797* | The predicate "is a totally bounded metric space." (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) → (𝑀 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑋) ↔ ∀𝑑 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑣 ∈ Fin (∪ 𝑣 = 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑣 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑏 = (𝑥(ball‘𝑀)𝑑)))) | ||
| Theorem | istotbnd3 38798* | A metric space is totally bounded iff there is a finite ε-net for every positive ε. This differs from the definition in providing a finite set of ball centers rather than a finite set of balls. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑋) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑣 (𝑥(ball‘𝑀)𝑑) = 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | totbndmet 38799 | The predicate "totally bounded" implies 𝑀 is a metric space. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑋) → 𝑀 ∈ (Met‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | 0totbnd 38800 | The metric (there is only one) on the empty set is totally bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → (𝑀 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑋) ↔ 𝑀 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |