Theorem opcon2b 39369

Description: Orthocomplement contraposition law. (negcon2 11425 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
opoccl.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
opoccl.o	⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opcon2b	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ↔ 𝑌 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))

Proof of Theorem opcon2b

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opoccl.b	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
2		opoccl.o	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)
3	1, 2	opoccl 39366	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ∈ 𝐵)
4	3	3adant2 1131	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ∈ 𝐵)
5	1, 2	opcon3b 39368	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ↔ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑌)) = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
6	4, 5	syld3an3 1411	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ↔ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑌)) = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
7	1, 2	opococ 39367	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑌)) = 𝑌)
8	7	3adant2 1131	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑌)) = 𝑌)
9	8	eqeq1d 2735	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑌)) = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ↔ 𝑌 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
10	6, 9	bitrd 279	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ↔ 𝑌 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113  ‘cfv 6489  Basecbs 17127  occoc 17176  OPcops 39344

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-ext 2705  ax-nul 5248

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2712  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2808  df-ne 2930  df-ral 3049  df-rab 3397  df-v 3439  df-dif 3901  df-un 3903  df-ss 3915  df-nul 4283  df-if 4477  df-sn 4578  df-pr 4580  df-op 4584  df-uni 4861  df-br 5096  df-dm 5631  df-iota 6445  df-fv 6497  df-ov 7358  df-oposet 39348

This theorem is referenced by:  opcon1b  39370  riotaocN  39381  glbconxN  39550