Theorem opcon2b 39197

Description: Orthocomplement contraposition law. (negcon2 11482 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
opoccl.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
opoccl.o	⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opcon2b	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ↔ 𝑌 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))

Proof of Theorem opcon2b

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opoccl.b	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
2		opoccl.o	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)
3	1, 2	opoccl 39194	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ∈ 𝐵)
4	3	3adant2 1131	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ∈ 𝐵)
5	1, 2	opcon3b 39196	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ↔ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑌)) = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
6	4, 5	syld3an3 1411	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ↔ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑌)) = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
7	1, 2	opococ 39195	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑌)) = 𝑌)
8	7	3adant2 1131	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑌)) = 𝑌)
9	8	eqeq1d 2732	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑌)) = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ↔ 𝑌 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
10	6, 9	bitrd 279	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ↔ 𝑌 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ‘cfv 6514  Basecbs 17186  occoc 17235  OPcops 39172

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2702  ax-nul 5264

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-dif 3920  df-un 3922  df-ss 3934  df-nul 4300  df-if 4492  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4875  df-br 5111  df-dm 5651  df-iota 6467  df-fv 6522  df-ov 7393  df-oposet 39176

This theorem is referenced by:  opcon1b  39198  riotaocN  39209  glbconxN  39379