Theorem opelopabaf 5527

Description: The law of concretion. Theorem 9.5 of [Quine] p. 61. This version of opelopab 5525 uses bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
opelopabaf.x	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
opelopabaf.y	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓
opelopabaf.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
opelopabaf.2	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
opelopabaf.3	⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opelopabaf	⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem opelopabaf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opelopabsb 5512	. 2 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑)
2		opelopabaf.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
3		opelopabaf.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
4		opelopabaf.x	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
5		opelopabaf.y	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓
6		nfv 1947	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐵 ∈ V
7		opelopabaf.3	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
8	4, 5, 6, 7	sbc2iegf 3816	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
9	2, 3, 8	mp2an 705	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
10	1, 9	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  Ⅎwnf 1816   ∈ wcel 2145  Vcvv 3453  [wsbc 3742  ⟨cop 4593  {copab 5171

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-pr 5402

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-opab 5172

This theorem is used by: (None)