Theorem rspc3ev 3589

Description: 3-variable restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspc3v.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
rspc3v.2	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
rspc3v.3	⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspc3ev	⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝜓,𝑧   𝜒,𝑥   𝜃,𝑦   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑦,𝐵,𝑧   𝑧,𝐶   𝑥,𝑅   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦   𝑥,𝑇,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑦,𝑧)   𝜃(𝑥,𝑧)   𝐵(𝑥)   𝐶(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑅(𝑦,𝑧)   𝑆(𝑧)

Proof of Theorem rspc3ev

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspc3v.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	rexbidv 3176	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜒))
3		rspc3v.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
4	3	rexbidv 3176	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜃))
5		simpl1 1201	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)
6		simpl2 1202	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)
7		rspc3v.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))
8	7	rspcev 3572	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜃)
9	8	3ad2antl3 1197	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜃)
10	2, 4, 5, 6, 9	2rspcedvdw 3586	1 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   ∧ w3a 1095   = wceq 1550   ∈ wcel 2132  ∃wrex 3076

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1805  ax-4 1819  ax-5 1920  ax-6 1977  ax-7 2018  ax-8 2134  ax-9 2142  ax-ext 2724

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-3an 1097  df-tru 1553  df-ex 1790  df-sb 2081  df-clab 2731  df-cleq 2744  df-clel 2827  df-ral 3067  df-rex 3077

This theorem is referenced by:  3rspcedvdw  3590  f1dom3el3dif  7238  wrdl3s3  14961  pmltpclem1  25479  bdayfinbndlem1  28526  axlowdim  29097  axeuclidlem  29098  upgr3v3e3cycl  30317  br8d  32749  tgoldbachgt  34904  2goelgoanfmla1  35712  br8  36044  br6  36045  3dim1lem5  40028  lplni2  40099  3cubes  43209  jm2.27  43523  grimgrtri  48509  usgrexmpl1tri  48585