Theorem rspc3ev 3599

Description: 3-variable restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspc3v.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
rspc3v.2	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
rspc3v.3	⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspc3ev	⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝜓,𝑧   𝜒,𝑥   𝜃,𝑦   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑦,𝐵,𝑧   𝑧,𝐶   𝑥,𝑅   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦   𝑥,𝑇,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑦,𝑧)   𝜃(𝑥,𝑧)   𝐵(𝑥)   𝐶(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑅(𝑦,𝑧)   𝑆(𝑧)

Proof of Theorem rspc3ev

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspc3v.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	rexbidv 3187	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜒))
3		rspc3v.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
4	3	rexbidv 3187	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜃))
5		simpl1 1206	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)
6		simpl2 1207	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)
7		rspc3v.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))
8	7	rspcev 3582	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜃)
9	8	3ad2antl3 1202	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜃)
10	2, 4, 5, 6, 9	2rspcedvdw 3596	1 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   ∧ w3a 1099   = wceq 1561   ∈ wcel 2143  ∃wrex 3087

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1816  ax-4 1830  ax-5 1931  ax-6 1988  ax-7 2029  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-ext 2735

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1564  df-ex 1801  df-sb 2092  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088

This theorem is referenced by:  3rspcedvdw  3600  f1dom3el3dif  7253  wrdl3s3  14985  pmltpclem1  25517  bdayfinbndlem1  28567  axlowdim  29169  axeuclidlem  29170  upgr3v3e3cycl  30389  br8d  32816  tgoldbachgt  34959  2goelgoanfmla1  35779  br8  36111  br6  36112  3dim1lem5  40095  lplni2  40166  3cubes  43276  jm2.27  43590  grimgrtri  48562  usgrexmpl1tri  48638