Theorem rspc3ev 3597

Description: 3-variable restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspc3v.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
rspc3v.2	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
rspc3v.3	⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspc3ev	⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝜓,𝑧   𝜒,𝑥   𝜃,𝑦   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑦,𝐵,𝑧   𝑧,𝐶   𝑥,𝑅   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦   𝑥,𝑇,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑦,𝑧)   𝜃(𝑥,𝑧)   𝐵(𝑥)   𝐶(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑅(𝑦,𝑧)   𝑆(𝑧)

Proof of Theorem rspc3ev

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspc3v.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	rexbidv 3187	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜒))
3		rspc3v.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
4	3	rexbidv 3187	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜃))
5		simpl1 1208	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)
6		simpl2 1209	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)
7		rspc3v.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))
8	7	rspcev 3580	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜃)
9	8	3ad2antl3 1204	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜃)
10	2, 4, 5, 6, 9	2rspcedvdw 3594	1 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1101   = wceq 1568   ∈ wcel 2141  ∃wrex 3087

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1823  ax-4 1837  ax-5 1938  ax-6 1995  ax-7 2036  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-ext 2733

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1571  df-ex 1808  df-sb 2095  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088

This theorem is referenced by:  3rspcedvdw  3598  f1dom3el3dif  7267  wrdl3s3  14998  pmltpclem1  25586  bdayfinbndlem1  28636  axlowdim  29277  axeuclidlem  29278  upgr3v3e3cycl  30497  br8d  32919  tgoldbachgt  35016  2goelgoanfmla1  35870  br8  36202  br6  36203  3dim1lem5  40186  lplni2  40257  3cubes  43369  jm2.27  43683  grimgrtri  48659  usgrexmpl1tri  48735