Theorem rspc3ev 3579

Description: 3-variable restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspc3v.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
rspc3v.2	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
rspc3v.3	⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspc3ev	⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝜓,𝑧   𝜒,𝑥   𝜃,𝑦   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑦,𝐵,𝑧   𝑧,𝐶   𝑥,𝑅   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦   𝑥,𝑇,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑦,𝑧)   𝜃(𝑥,𝑧)   𝐵(𝑥)   𝐶(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑅(𝑦,𝑧)   𝑆(𝑧)

Proof of Theorem rspc3ev

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspc3v.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	rexbidv 3159	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜒))
3		rspc3v.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
4	3	rexbidv 3159	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜃))
5		simpl1 1193	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)
6		simpl2 1194	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)
7		rspc3v.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))
8	7	rspcev 3562	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜃)
9	8	3ad2antl3 1189	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜃)
10	2, 4, 5, 6, 9	2rspcedvdw 3576	1 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  ∃wrex 3059

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2707

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2810  df-ral 3050  df-rex 3060

This theorem is referenced by:  3rspcedvdw  3580  f1dom3el3dif  7213  wrdl3s3  14913  pmltpclem1  25403  bdayfinbndlem1  28447  axlowdim  29018  axeuclidlem  29019  upgr3v3e3cycl  30238  br8d  32669  tgoldbachgt  34795  2goelgoanfmla1  35594  br8  35926  br6  35927  3dim1lem5  39900  lplni2  39971  3cubes  43110  jm2.27  43424  grimgrtri  48413  usgrexmpl1tri  48489