Theorem slmdvsass 33358

Description: Associative law for scalar product. (ax-hvmulass 31156 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Apr-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
slmdvsass.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
slmdvsass.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
slmdvsass.s	⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
slmdvsass.k	⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)
slmdvsass.t	⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
slmdvsass	⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑋) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑋)))

Proof of Theorem slmdvsass

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		slmdvsass.v	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
2		eqid 2761	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (+g‘𝑊) = (+g‘𝑊)
3		slmdvsass.s	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
4		eqid 2761	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (0g‘𝑊) = (0g‘𝑊)
5		slmdvsass.f	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
6		slmdvsass.k	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)
7		eqid 2761	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (+g‘𝐹) = (+g‘𝐹)
8		slmdvsass.t	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹)
9		eqid 2761	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (1r‘𝐹) = (1r‘𝐹)
10		eqid 2761	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (0g‘𝐹) = (0g‘𝐹)
11	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10	slmdlema 33344	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝑅 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑅 · (𝑋(+g‘𝑊)𝑋)) = ((𝑅 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑅 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑄(+g‘𝐹)𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑅 · 𝑋))) ∧ (((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑋) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((1r‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = 𝑋 ∧ ((0g‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = (0g‘𝑊))))
12	11	simprd 499	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑋) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((1r‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = 𝑋 ∧ ((0g‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = (0g‘𝑊)))
13	12	simp1d 1154	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑋) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑋)))
14	13	3expa 1130	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑋) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑋)))
15	14	anabsan2 684	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑋) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑋)))
16	15	exp42 439	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ SLMod → (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 → (𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑋) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑋))))))
17	16	3imp2 1362	1 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑋) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑋)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   ∧ w3a 1097   = wceq 1559   ∈ wcel 2141  ‘cfv 6517  (class class class)co 7392  Basecbs 17228  +_gcplusg 17269  ._rcmulr 17270  Scalarcsca 17272   ·_𝑠 cvsca 17273  0_gc0g 17451  1_rcur 20210  SLModcslmd 33341

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1814  ax-4 1828  ax-5 1929  ax-6 1986  ax-7 2027  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-ext 2733  ax-nul 5255

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1099  df-tru 1562  df-fal 1572  df-ex 1799  df-sb 2090  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3076  df-rab 3414  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3745  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-sn 4582  df-pr 4584  df-op 4588  df-uni 4865  df-br 5100  df-iota 6473  df-fv 6525  df-ov 7395  df-slmd 33342

This theorem is referenced by:  slmdvs0  33366