Theorem slmdvsdir 31514

Description: Distributive law for scalar product. (ax-hvdistr1 29415 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Apr-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
slmdvsdir.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
slmdvsdir.a	⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)
slmdvsdir.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
slmdvsdir.s	⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
slmdvsdir.k	⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)
slmdvsdir.p	⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
slmdvsdir	⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)))

Proof of Theorem slmdvsdir

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		slmdvsdir.v	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
2		slmdvsdir.a	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)
3		slmdvsdir.s	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
4		eqid 2736	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (0g‘𝑊) = (0g‘𝑊)
5		slmdvsdir.f	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
6		slmdvsdir.k	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)
7		slmdvsdir.p	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹)
8		eqid 2736	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (.r‘𝐹) = (.r‘𝐹)
9		eqid 2736	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (1r‘𝐹) = (1r‘𝐹)
10		eqid 2736	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (0g‘𝐹) = (0g‘𝐹)
11	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10	slmdlema 31501	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝑅 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑅 · (𝑋 + 𝑋)) = ((𝑅 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋))) ∧ (((𝑄(.r‘𝐹)𝑅) · 𝑋) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((1r‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = 𝑋 ∧ ((0g‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = (0g‘𝑊))))
12	11	simpld 496	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑅 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑅 · (𝑋 + 𝑋)) = ((𝑅 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋))))
13	12	simp3d 1144	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)))
14	13	3expa 1118	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)))
15	14	anabsan2 672	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)))
16	15	exp42 437	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ SLMod → (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 → (𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋))))))
17	16	3imp2 1349	1 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 397   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2104  ‘cfv 6458  (class class class)co 7307  Basecbs 16957  +_gcplusg 17007  ._rcmulr 17008  Scalarcsca 17010   ·_𝑠 cvsca 17011  0_gc0g 17195  1_rcur 19782  SLModcslmd 31498

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2106  ax-9 2114  ax-ext 2707  ax-nul 5239

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 846  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2814  df-ne 2942  df-ral 3063  df-rab 3287  df-v 3439  df-sbc 3722  df-dif 3895  df-un 3897  df-in 3899  df-ss 3909  df-nul 4263  df-if 4466  df-sn 4566  df-pr 4568  df-op 4572  df-uni 4845  df-br 5082  df-iota 6410  df-fv 6466  df-ov 7310  df-slmd 31499

This theorem is referenced by:  gsumvsca2  31525