Theorem slmdvsdir 33844

Description: Distributive law for scalar product. (ax-hvdistr1 31637 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Apr-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
slmdvsdir.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
slmdvsdir.a	⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)
slmdvsdir.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
slmdvsdir.s	⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
slmdvsdir.k	⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)
slmdvsdir.p	⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
slmdvsdir	⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)))

Proof of Theorem slmdvsdir

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		slmdvsdir.v	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
2		slmdvsdir.a	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)
3		slmdvsdir.s	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
4		eqid 2763	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (0g‘𝑊) = (0g‘𝑊)
5		slmdvsdir.f	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
6		slmdvsdir.k	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)
7		slmdvsdir.p	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹)
8		eqid 2763	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (.r‘𝐹) = (.r‘𝐹)
9		eqid 2763	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (1r‘𝐹) = (1r‘𝐹)
10		eqid 2763	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (0g‘𝐹) = (0g‘𝐹)
11	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10	slmdlema 33831	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝑅 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑅 · (𝑋 + 𝑋)) = ((𝑅 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋))) ∧ (((𝑄(.r‘𝐹)𝑅) · 𝑋) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((1r‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = 𝑋 ∧ ((0g‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = (0g‘𝑊))))
12	11	simpld 500	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑅 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑅 · (𝑋 + 𝑋)) = ((𝑅 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋))))
13	12	simp3d 1162	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)))
14	13	3expa 1136	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)))
15	14	anabsan2 687	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)))
16	15	exp42 441	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ SLMod → (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 → (𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋))))))
17	16	3imp2 1368	1 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ‘cfv 6555  (class class class)co 7440  Basecbs 17413  +_gcplusg 17454  ._rcmulr 17455  Scalarcsca 17457   ·_𝑠 cvsca 17458  0_gc0g 17636  1_rcur 20434  SLModcslmd 33828

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-ext 2735  ax-nul 5263

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-iota 6509  df-fv 6563  df-ov 7443  df-slmd 33829

This theorem is used by:  gsumvsca2  33855