![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ssoprab2i | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Inference of operation class abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ssoprab2i.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ssoprab2i | ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ssoprab2i.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | |
2 | 1 | anim2i 607 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜓)) |
3 | 2 | 2eximi 1798 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜓)) |
4 | 3 | ssopab2i 5289 | . 2 ⊢ {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜓)} |
5 | dfoprab2 7031 | . 2 ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
6 | dfoprab2 7031 | . 2 ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜓)} | |
7 | 4, 5, 6 | 3sstr4i 3900 | 1 ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 387 = wceq 1507 ∃wex 1742 ⊆ wss 3829 〈cop 4447 {copab 4991 {coprab 6977 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1758 ax-4 1772 ax-5 1869 ax-6 1928 ax-7 1965 ax-8 2052 ax-9 2059 ax-10 2079 ax-11 2093 ax-12 2106 ax-ext 2750 ax-sep 5060 ax-nul 5067 ax-pr 5186 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 199 df-an 388 df-or 834 df-3an 1070 df-tru 1510 df-ex 1743 df-nf 1747 df-sb 2016 df-clab 2759 df-cleq 2771 df-clel 2846 df-nfc 2918 df-rab 3097 df-v 3417 df-dif 3832 df-un 3834 df-in 3836 df-ss 3843 df-nul 4179 df-if 4351 df-sn 4442 df-pr 4444 df-op 4448 df-opab 4992 df-oprab 6980 |
This theorem is referenced by: sxbrsigalem5 31197 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |