![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ssoprab2i | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Inference of operation class abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ssoprab2i.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ssoprab2i | ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ssoprab2i.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | |
2 | 1 | anim2i 618 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜓)) |
3 | 2 | 2eximi 1839 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜓)) |
4 | 3 | ssopab2i 5546 | . 2 ⊢ {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜓)} |
5 | dfoprab2 7454 | . 2 ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
6 | dfoprab2 7454 | . 2 ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜓)} | |
7 | 4, 5, 6 | 3sstr4i 4023 | 1 ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 397 = wceq 1542 ∃wex 1782 ⊆ wss 3946 〈cop 4630 {copab 5206 {coprab 7397 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2109 ax-9 2117 ax-11 2155 ax-ext 2704 ax-sep 5295 ax-nul 5302 ax-pr 5423 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 398 df-or 847 df-3an 1090 df-tru 1545 df-fal 1555 df-ex 1783 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2711 df-cleq 2725 df-clel 2811 df-rab 3434 df-v 3477 df-dif 3949 df-un 3951 df-in 3953 df-ss 3963 df-nul 4321 df-if 4525 df-sn 4625 df-pr 4627 df-op 4631 df-opab 5207 df-oprab 7400 |
This theorem is referenced by: sxbrsigalem5 33218 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |