| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 76 of 498) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30853) |
(30854-32376) |
(32377-49784) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | eloprabg 7501* | The law of concretion for operation class abstraction. Compare elopab 5489. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-1999.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 𝐶〉 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | ssoprab2i 7502* | Inference of operation class abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} | ||
| Theorem | mpov 7503* | Operation with universal domain in maps-to notation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ 𝐶) = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝑧 = 𝐶} | ||
| Theorem | mpomptx 7504* | Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. In this version 𝐵(𝑥) is not assumed to be constant w.r.t 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | mpompt 7505* | Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | mpodifsnif 7506 | A mapping with two arguments with the first argument from a difference set with a singleton and a conditional as result. (Contributed by AV, 13-Feb-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑖 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}), 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑖 = 𝑋, 𝐶, 𝐷)) = (𝑖 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}), 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | mposnif 7507 | A mapping with two arguments with the first argument from a singleton and a conditional as result. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑖 ∈ {𝑋}, 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑖 = 𝑋, 𝐶, 𝐷)) = (𝑖 ∈ {𝑋}, 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fconstmpo 7508* | Representation of a constant operation using the mapping operation. (Contributed by SO, 11-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × {𝐶}) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | resoprab 7509* | Restriction of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-2007.) |
| ⊢ ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} | ||
| Theorem | resoprab2 7510* | Restriction of an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) → ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} ↾ (𝐶 × 𝐷)) = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝜑)}) | ||
| Theorem | resmpo 7511* | Restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐸) ↾ (𝐶 × 𝐷)) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | funoprabg 7512* | "At most one" is a sufficient condition for an operation class abstraction to be a function. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2007.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∃*𝑧𝜑 → Fun {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | funoprab 7513* | "At most one" is a sufficient condition for an operation class abstraction to be a function. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1995.) |
| ⊢ ∃*𝑧𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ Fun {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | fnoprabg 7514* | Functionality and domain of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2007.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∃!𝑧𝜓) → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} Fn {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | mpofun 7515* | The maps-to notation for an operation is always a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Mar-2012.) (Proof shortened by SN, 23-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ Fun 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | fnoprab 7516* | Functionality and domain of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑧𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} Fn {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | ffnov 7517* | An operation maps to a class to which all values belong. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶 ↔ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | fovcld 7518 | Closure law for an operation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Feb-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝑅 × 𝑆)⟶𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fovcl 7519 | Closure law for an operation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹:(𝑅 × 𝑆)⟶𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | eqfnov 7520* | Equality of two operations is determined by their values. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Fn (𝐶 × 𝐷)) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐶 × 𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐺𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | eqfnov2 7521* | Two operators with the same domain are equal iff their values at each point in the domain are equal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 7-Jun-2010.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵)) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐺𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | fnov 7522* | Representation of a function in terms of its values. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥𝐹𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | mpo2eqb 7523* | Bidirectional equality theorem for a mapping abstraction. Equivalent to eqfnov2 7521. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | rnmpo 7524* | The range of an operation given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 20-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝐹 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = 𝐶} | ||
| Theorem | reldmmpo 7525* | The domain of an operation defined by maps-to notation is a relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ Rel dom 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | elrnmpog 7526* | Membership in the range of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | elrnmpo 7527* | Membership in the range of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | elimampo 7528* | Membership in the image of an operation. (Contributed by SN, 27-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐷 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝑋 × 𝑌)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 𝐷 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | elrnmpores 7529* | Membership in the range of a restricted operation class abstraction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐷 ∈ ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐷 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | ralrnmpo 7530* | A restricted quantifier over an image set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐹𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | rexrnmpo 7531* | A restricted quantifier over an image set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐹𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | ovid 7532* | The value of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃!𝑧𝜑) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ovidig 7533* | The value of an operation class abstraction. Compare ovidi 7534. The condition (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) is been removed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ∃*𝑧𝜑 & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧) | ||
| Theorem | ovidi 7534* | The value of an operation class abstraction (weak version). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃*𝑧𝜑) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | ov 7535* | The value of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃!𝑧𝜑) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | ovigg 7536* | The value of an operation class abstraction. Compared with ovig 7537, the condition (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) is removed. (Contributed by FL, 24-Mar-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ ∃*𝑧𝜑 & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝜓 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ovig 7537* | The value of an operation class abstraction (weak version). (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-1999.) Remove unnecessary distinct variable conditions. (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃*𝑧𝜑) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝜓 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ovmpt4g 7538* | Value of a function given by the maps-to notation. (This is the operation analogue of fvmpt2 6981.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | ovmpos 7539* | Value of a function given by the maps-to notation, expressed using explicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | ov2gf 7540* | The value of an operation class abstraction. A version of ovmpog 7550 using bound-variable hypotheses. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐺 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑆 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑅 = 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → 𝐺 = 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | ovmpodxf 7541* | Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, deduction form. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → 𝑅 = 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐷 = 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑆 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑆 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | ovmpodx 7542* | Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, deduction form. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → 𝑅 = 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐷 = 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | ovmpod 7543* | Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, deduction form. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → 𝑅 = 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | ovmpox 7544* | The value of an operation class abstraction. Variant of ovmpoga 7545 which does not require 𝐷 and 𝑥 to be distinct. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝑅 = 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐷 = 𝐿) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | ovmpoga 7545* | Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝑅 = 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | ovmpoa 7546* | Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝑅 = 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | ovmpodf 7547* | Alternate deduction version of ovmpo 7551, suitable for iteration. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑅 → 𝜓)) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅) → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | ovmpodv 7548* | Alternate deduction version of ovmpo 7551, suitable for iteration. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑅 → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅) → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | ovmpodv2 7549* | Alternate deduction version of ovmpo 7551, suitable for iteration. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → 𝑅 = 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | ovmpog 7550* | Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule. Special case. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-1999.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑅 = 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → 𝐺 = 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | ovmpo 7551* | Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule. Special case. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑅 = 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → 𝐺 = 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | ovmpot 7552* | The value of an operation is equal to the value of the same operation expressed in maps-to notation. (Contributed by GG, 16-Mar-2025.) (Revised by GG, 13-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝑥𝐹𝑦))𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | fvmpopr2d 7553* | Value of an operation given by maps-to notation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | ov3 7554* | The value of an operation class abstraction. Special case. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V & ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐷)) → 𝑅 = 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = 〈𝑤, 𝑣〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑢, 𝑓〉) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))} ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐻)) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉𝐹〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | ov6g 7555* | The value of an operation class abstraction. Special case. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2006.) |
| ⊢ (〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 = 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 → 𝑅 = 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ (〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)} ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐽) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | ovg 7556* | The value of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ ((𝜏 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → ∃!𝑧𝜑) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜏 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | ovres 7557 | The value of a restricted operation. (Contributed by FL, 10-Nov-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴(𝐹 ↾ (𝐶 × 𝐷))𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ovresd 7558 | Lemma for converting metric theorems to metric space theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(𝐷 ↾ (𝑋 × 𝑋))𝐵) = (𝐴𝐷𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | oprres 7559* | The restriction of an operation is an operation. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2008.) (Revised by AV, 19-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐺𝑦)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝑌 × 𝑌)⟶𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ↾ (𝑌 × 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | oprssov 7560 | The value of a member of the domain of a subclass of an operation. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2007.) |
| ⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐺 Fn (𝐶 × 𝐷) ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | fovcdm 7561 | An operation's value belongs to its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:(𝑅 × 𝑆)⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fovcdmda 7562 | An operation's value belongs to its codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝑅 × 𝑆)⟶𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fovcdmd 7563 | An operation's value belongs to its codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝑅 × 𝑆)⟶𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fnrnov 7564* | The range of an operation expressed as a collection of the operation's values. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) → ran 𝐹 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑥𝐹𝑦)}) | ||
| Theorem | foov 7565* | An onto mapping of an operation expressed in terms of operation values. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐶 ↔ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑥𝐹𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | fnovrn 7566 | An operation's value belongs to its range. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐶𝐹𝐷) ∈ ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | ovelrn 7567* | A member of an operation's range is a value of the operation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = (𝑥𝐹𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | funimassov 7568* | Membership relation for the values of a function whose image is a subclass. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹 “ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ovelimab 7569* | Operation value in an image. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐷 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝐵 × 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝐷 = (𝑥𝐹𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | ovima0 7570 | An operation value is a member of the image plus null. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝑅𝑌) ∈ ((𝑅 “ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∪ {∅})) | ||
| Theorem | ovconst2 7571 | The value of a constant operation. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2006.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑅((𝐴 × 𝐵) × {𝐶})𝑆) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | oprssdm 7572* | Domain of closure of an operation. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.) |
| ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆 & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⊆ dom 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | nssdmovg 7573 | The value of an operation outside its domain. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((dom 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑅 × 𝑆) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ndmovg 7574 | The value of an operation outside its domain. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((dom 𝐹 = (𝑅 × 𝑆) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ndmov 7575 | The value of an operation outside its domain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.) |
| ⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ndmovcl 7576 | The closure of an operation outside its domain, when the domain includes the empty set. This technical lemma can make the operation more convenient to work in some cases. It is dependent on our particular definitions of operation value, function value, and ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ∅ ∈ 𝑆 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝑆 | ||
| Theorem | ndmovrcl 7577 | Reverse closure law, when an operation's domain doesn't contain the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) & ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | ndmovcom 7578 | Any operation is commutative outside its domain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.) |
| ⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ndmovass 7579 | Any operation is associative outside its domain, if the domain doesn't contain the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.) |
| ⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) & ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆 ⇒ ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | ndmovdistr 7580 | Any operation is distributive outside its domain, if the domain doesn't contain the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.) |
| ⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) & ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆 & ⊢ dom 𝐺 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐹(𝐴𝐺𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | ndmovord 7581 | Elimination of redundant antecedents in an ordering law. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-1996.) |
| ⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) & ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆 & ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | ndmovordi 7582 | Elimination of redundant antecedent in an ordering law. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-1998.) |
| ⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) & ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆 & ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵) → 𝐴𝑅𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | caovclg 7583* | Convert an operation closure law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | caovcld 7584* | Convert an operation closure law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | caovcl 7585* | Convert an operation closure law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | caovcomg 7586* | Convert an operation commutative law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | caovcomd 7587* | Convert an operation commutative law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | caovcom 7588* | Convert an operation commutative law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | caovassg 7589* | Convert an operation associative law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | caovassd 7590* | Convert an operation associative law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | caovass 7591* | Convert an operation associative law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | caovcang 7592* | Convert an operation cancellation law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐹𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | caovcand 7593* | Convert an operation cancellation law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐹𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | caovcanrd 7594* | Commute the arguments of an operation cancellation law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐹𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐵𝐹𝐴) = (𝐶𝐹𝐴) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | caovcan 7595* | Convert an operation cancellation law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐹𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐶) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | caovordig 7596* | Convert an operation ordering law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 → (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | caovordid 7597* | Convert an operation ordering law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 → (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | caovordg 7598* | Convert an operation ordering law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | caovordd 7599* | Convert an operation ordering law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | caovord2d 7600* | Operation ordering law with commuted arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝑅(𝐵𝐹𝐶))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |