MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  eloprabg Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem eloprabg 7540
Description: The law of concretion for operation class abstraction. Compare elopab 5505. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-1999.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
eloprabg.1 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
eloprabg.2 (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
eloprabg.3 (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
Assertion
Ref Expression
eloprabg ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜃))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦,𝑧   𝜃,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝜒(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝑉(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝑊(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝑋(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem eloprabg
StepHypRef Expression
1 eloprabg.1 . . 3 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2 eloprabg.2 . . 3 (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3 eloprabg.3 . . 3 (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
41, 2, 3syl3an9b 1462 . 2 ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
54eloprabga 7539 1 ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜃))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2146  ⟨cop 4838  {coprab 7431
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-pr 5395
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2101  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-oprab 7434
This theorem is used by:  ov  7574  ovg  7595  brbtwn  29492  isnvlem  31227  isphg  31434  fvtransport  36927  brcolinear2  36953  colineardim1  36956  fvray  37036  fvline  37039
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator