Theorem sbcralt 3075

Description: Interchange class substitution and restricted quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 22-Feb-2010.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbcralt	|- ( ( A e. V /\ F/_ y A ) -> ( [. A / x ]. A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B [. A / x ]. ph ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y   x, B

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)   A( x, y)   B( y)   V( x, y)

Proof of Theorem sbcralt

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbcco 3020	. 2 |- ( [. A / z ]. [. z / x ]. A. y e. B ph <-> [. A / x ]. A. y e. B ph )
2		simpl 109	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. V /\ F/_ y A ) -> A e. V )
3		sbsbc 3002	. . . . 5 |- ( [ z / x ] A. y e. B ph <-> [. z / x ]. A. y e. B ph )
4		nfcv 2348	. . . . . . 7 |- F/_ x B
5		nfs1v 1967	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ x [ z / x ] ph
6	4, 5	nfralxy 2544	. . . . . 6 |- F/ x A. y e. B [ z / x ] ph
7		sbequ12 1794	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = z -> ( ph <-> [ z / x ] ph ) )
8	7	ralbidv 2506	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = z -> ( A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B [ z / x ] ph ) )
9	6, 8	sbie 1814	. . . . 5 |- ( [ z / x ] A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B [ z / x ] ph )
10	3, 9	bitr3i 186	. . . 4 |- ( [. z / x ]. A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B [ z / x ] ph )
11		nfnfc1 2351	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ y F/_ y A
12		nfcvd 2349	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( F/_ y A -> F/_ y z )
13		id 19	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( F/_ y A -> F/_ y A )
14	12, 13	nfeqd 2363	. . . . . . 7 |- ( F/_ y A -> F/ y z = A )
15	11, 14	nfan1 1587	. . . . . 6 |- F/ y ( F/_ y A /\ z = A )
16		dfsbcq2 3001	. . . . . . 7 |- ( z = A -> ( [ z / x ] ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph ) )
17	16	adantl 277	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( F/_ y A /\ z = A ) -> ( [ z / x ] ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph ) )
18	15, 17	ralbid 2504	. . . . 5 |- ( ( F/_ y A /\ z = A ) -> ( A. y e. B [ z / x ] ph <-> A. y e. B [. A / x ]. ph ) )
19	18	adantll 476	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( A e. V /\ F/_ y A ) /\ z = A ) -> ( A. y e. B [ z / x ] ph <-> A. y e. B [. A / x ]. ph ) )
20	10, 19	bitrid 192	. . 3 |- ( ( ( A e. V /\ F/_ y A ) /\ z = A ) -> ( [. z / x ]. A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B [. A / x ]. ph ) )
21	2, 20	sbcied 3035	. 2 |- ( ( A e. V /\ F/_ y A ) -> ( [. A / z ]. [. z / x ]. A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B [. A / x ]. ph ) )
22	1, 21	bitr3id 194	1 |- ( ( A e. V /\ F/_ y A ) -> ( [. A / x ]. A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B [. A / x ]. ph ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1373   [wsb 1785   e. wcel 2176   F/_wnfc 2335   A.wral 2484   [.wsbc 2998

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1470  ax-7 1471  ax-gen 1472  ax-ie1 1516  ax-ie2 1517  ax-8 1527  ax-10 1528  ax-11 1529  ax-i12 1530  ax-bndl 1532  ax-4 1533  ax-17 1549  ax-i9 1553  ax-ial 1557  ax-i5r 1558  ax-ext 2187

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1484  df-sb 1786  df-clab 2192  df-cleq 2198  df-clel 2201  df-nfc 2337  df-ral 2489  df-v 2774  df-sbc 2999

This theorem is referenced by: (None)