Theorem ssopab2 4197

Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction subclass and implication. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssopab2	⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})

Proof of Theorem ssopab2

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfa1 1521	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓)
2		nfa1 1521	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓)
3		sp 1488	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
4	3	anim2d 335	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
5	2, 4	eximd 1591	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
6	5	sps 1517	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
7	1, 6	eximd 1591	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
8	7	ss2abdv 3170	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)})
9		df-opab 3990	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
10		df-opab 3990	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
11	8, 9, 10	3sstr4g 3140	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103  ∀wal 1329   = wceq 1331  ∃wex 1468  {cab 2125   ⊆ wss 3071  ⟨cop 3530  {copab 3988

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2126  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-in 3077  df-ss 3084  df-opab 3990

This theorem is referenced by:  ssopab2b  4198  ssopab2i  4199  ssopab2dv  4200