Theorem ssopab2 4093

Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction subclass and implication. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssopab2	⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})

Proof of Theorem ssopab2

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfa1 1479	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓)
2		nfa1 1479	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓)
3		sp 1446	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
4	3	anim2d 330	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
5	2, 4	eximd 1548	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
6	5	sps 1475	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
7	1, 6	eximd 1548	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
8	7	ss2abdv 3092	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)})
9		df-opab 3892	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
10		df-opab 3892	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
11	8, 9, 10	3sstr4g 3065	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102  ∀wal 1287   = wceq 1289  ∃wex 1426  {cab 2074   ⊆ wss 2997  ⟨cop 3444  {copab 3890

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 665  ax-5 1381  ax-7 1382  ax-gen 1383  ax-ie1 1427  ax-ie2 1428  ax-8 1440  ax-10 1441  ax-11 1442  ax-i12 1443  ax-bndl 1444  ax-4 1445  ax-17 1464  ax-i9 1468  ax-ial 1472  ax-i5r 1473  ax-ext 2070

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1395  df-sb 1693  df-clab 2075  df-cleq 2081  df-clel 2084  df-nfc 2217  df-in 3003  df-ss 3010  df-opab 3892

This theorem is referenced by:  ssopab2b  4094  ssopab2i  4095  ssopab2dv  4096