Theorem abnex 7756

Description: Sufficient condition for a class abstraction to be a proper class. Lemma for snnex 7757 and pwnex 7758. See the comment of abnexg 7755. (Contributed by BJ, 2-May-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abnex	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ¬ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑦,𝐹

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐹(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem abnex

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vprc 5290	. 2 ⊢ ¬ V ∈ V
2		alral 3066	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ∀𝑥 ∈ V (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹))
3		rexv 3493	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹)
4	3	bicomi 224	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹)
5	4	abbii 2803	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹}
6	5	eleq1i 2826	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V ↔ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)
7	6	biimpi 216	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)
8		abnexg 7755	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ V (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V → V ∈ V))
9	2, 7, 8	syl2im 40	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V → V ∈ V))
10	1, 9	mtoi 199	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ¬ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1538   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2109  {cab 2714  ∀wral 3052  ∃wrex 3061  Vcvv 3464

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-11 2158  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5271  ax-un 7734

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2810  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3062  df-rab 3421  df-v 3466  df-in 3938  df-ss 3948  df-sn 4607  df-uni 4889  df-iun 4974

This theorem is referenced by:  snnex  7757  pwnex  7758