Theorem abnex 7459

Description: Sufficient condition for a class abstraction to be a proper class. Lemma for snnex 7460 and pwnex 7461. See the comment of abnexg 7458. (Contributed by BJ, 2-May-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abnex	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ¬ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑦,𝐹

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐹(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem abnex

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vprc 5183	. 2 ⊢ ¬ V ∈ V
2		alral 3122	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ∀𝑥 ∈ V (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹))
3		rexv 3467	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹)
4	3	bicomi 227	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹)
5	4	abbii 2863	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹}
6	5	eleq1i 2880	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V ↔ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)
7	6	biimpi 219	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)
8		abnexg 7458	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ V (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V → V ∈ V))
9	2, 7, 8	syl2im 40	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V → V ∈ V))
10	1, 9	mtoi 202	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ¬ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399  ∀wal 1536   = wceq 1538  ∃wex 1781   ∈ wcel 2111  {cab 2776  ∀wral 3106  ∃wrex 3107  Vcvv 3441

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770  ax-sep 5167  ax-un 7441

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-rab 3115  df-v 3443  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898  df-sn 4526  df-uni 4801  df-iun 4883

This theorem is referenced by:  snnex  7460  pwnex  7461