Theorem abnex 7607

Description: Sufficient condition for a class abstraction to be a proper class. Lemma for snnex 7608 and pwnex 7609. See the comment of abnexg 7606. (Contributed by BJ, 2-May-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abnex	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ¬ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑦,𝐹

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐹(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem abnex

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vprc 5239	. 2 ⊢ ¬ V ∈ V
2		alral 3080	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ∀𝑥 ∈ V (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹))
3		rexv 3457	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹)
4	3	bicomi 223	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹)
5	4	abbii 2808	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹}
6	5	eleq1i 2829	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V ↔ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)
7	6	biimpi 215	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)
8		abnexg 7606	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ V (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V → V ∈ V))
9	2, 7, 8	syl2im 40	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V → V ∈ V))
10	1, 9	mtoi 198	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ¬ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396  ∀wal 1537   = wceq 1539  ∃wex 1782   ∈ wcel 2106  {cab 2715  ∀wral 3064  ∃wrex 3065  Vcvv 3432

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5223  ax-un 7588

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-sn 4562  df-uni 4840  df-iun 4926

This theorem is referenced by:  snnex  7608  pwnex  7609