Theorem abnexg 7606

Description: Sufficient condition for a class abstraction to be a proper class. The class 𝐹 can be thought of as an expression in 𝑥 and the abstraction appearing in the statement as the class of values 𝐹 as 𝑥 varies through 𝐴. Assuming the antecedents, if that class is a set, then so is the "domain" 𝐴. The converse holds without antecedent, see abrexexg 7803. Note that the second antecedent ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 cannot be translated to 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐹 since 𝐹 may depend on 𝑥. In applications, one may take 𝐹 = {𝑥} or 𝐹 = 𝒫 𝑥 (see snnex 7608 and pwnex 7609 respectively, proved from abnex 7607, which is a consequence of abnexg 7606 with 𝐴 = V). (Contributed by BJ, 2-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abnexg	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐴 ∈ V))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑦,𝐹

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐹(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑊(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem abnexg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		uniexg 7593	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ 𝑊 → ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)
2		simpl 483	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
3	2	ralimi 3087	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
4		dfiun2g 4960	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐹 = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐹})
5	4	eleq1d 2823	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐹 ∈ V ↔ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V))
6	5	biimprd 247	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐹 ∈ V))
7	3, 6	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → (∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐹 ∈ V))
8		simpr 485	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹)
9	8	ralimi 3087	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹)
10		iunid 4990	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑥} = 𝐴
11		snssi 4741	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 → {𝑥} ⊆ 𝐹)
12	11	ralimi 3087	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑥} ⊆ 𝐹)
13		ss2iun 4942	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑥} ⊆ 𝐹 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑥} ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐹)
14	12, 13	syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑥} ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐹)
15	10, 14	eqsstrrid 3970	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 → 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐹)
16		ssexg 5247	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐹 ∧ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐹 ∈ V) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
17	16	ex 413	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐹 → (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐹 ∈ V → 𝐴 ∈ V))
18	9, 15, 17	3syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐹 ∈ V → 𝐴 ∈ V))
19	7, 18	syld 47	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → (∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V → 𝐴 ∈ V))
20	1, 19	syl5 34	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐴 ∈ V))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106  {cab 2715  ∀wral 3064  ∃wrex 3065  Vcvv 3432   ⊆ wss 3887  {csn 4561  ∪ cuni 4839  ∪ ciun 4924

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5223  ax-un 7588

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-sn 4562  df-uni 4840  df-iun 4926

This theorem is referenced by:  abnex  7607