| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 78 of 507) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31307) |
(31308-32830) |
(32831-50694) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | offun 7701 | The function operation produces a function. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | offval2f 7702* | The function operation expressed as a mapping. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵𝑅𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | ofmresval 7703 | Value of a restriction of the function operation map. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹( ∘f 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | fnfvof 7704 | Function value of a pointwise composition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | off 7705* | The function operation produces a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺):𝐶⟶𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | ofres 7706 | Restrict the operands of a function operation to the same domain as that of the operation itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐶) ∘f 𝑅(𝐺 ↾ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | offval2 7707* | The function operation expressed as a mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵𝑅𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | ofrfval2 7708* | The function relation acting on maps. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘r 𝑅𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵𝑅𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | offvalfv 7709* | The function operation expressed as a mapping with function values. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | ofmpteq 7710* | Value of a pointwise operation on two functions defined using maps-to notation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) Fn 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) Fn 𝐴) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∘f 𝑅(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵𝑅𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | coof 7711* | The composition of a homomorphism with a function operation. (Contributed by SN, 20-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑏𝑅𝑐) ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝐻‘(𝑏𝑅𝑐)) = ((𝐻‘𝑏)𝑆(𝐻‘𝑐))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 ∘ (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺)) = ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) ∘f 𝑆(𝐻 ∘ 𝐺))) | ||
| Theorem | ofco 7712 | The composition of a function operation with another function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐷⟶𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) ∘ 𝐻) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∘f 𝑅(𝐺 ∘ 𝐻))) | ||
| Theorem | offveq 7713* | Convert an identity of the operation to the analogous identity on the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵𝑅𝐶) = (𝐻‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = 𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | offveqb 7714* | Equivalent expressions for equality with a function operation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐵𝑅𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | ofc1 7715 | Left operation by a constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘f 𝑅𝐹)‘𝑋) = (𝐵𝑅𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ofc2 7716 | Right operation by a constant. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵}))‘𝑋) = (𝐶𝑅𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ofc12 7717 | Function operation on two constant functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘f 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐶})) = (𝐴 × {(𝐵𝑅𝐶)})) | ||
| Theorem | caofref 7718* | Transfer a reflexive law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥𝑅𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∘r 𝑅𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | caofinvl 7719* | Transfer a left inverse law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:𝑆⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑣)))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑁‘𝑥)𝑅𝑥) = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘f 𝑅𝐹) = (𝐴 × {𝐵})) | ||
| Theorem | caofid0l 7720* | Transfer a left identity law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐵𝑅𝑥) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘f 𝑅𝐹) = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | caofid0r 7721* | Transfer a right identity law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝑅𝐵) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵})) = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | caofid1 7722* | Transfer a right absorption law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝑅𝐵) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵})) = (𝐴 × {𝐶})) | ||
| Theorem | caofid2 7723* | Transfer a right absorption law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐵𝑅𝑥) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘f 𝑅𝐹) = (𝐴 × {𝐶})) | ||
| Theorem | caofcom 7724* | Transfer a commutative law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) = (𝑦𝑅𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝐺 ∘f 𝑅𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | caofidlcan 7725* | Transfer a cancellation/identity law to the function operation. (Contributed by SN, 16-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦) = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 0 )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = 𝐺 ↔ 𝐹 = (𝐴 × { 0 }))) | ||
| Theorem | caofrss 7726* | Transfer a relation subset law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑇𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘r 𝑅𝐺 → 𝐹 ∘r 𝑇𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | caofass 7727* | Transfer an associative law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦)𝑇𝑧) = (𝑥𝑂(𝑦𝑃𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) ∘f 𝑇𝐻) = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑂(𝐺 ∘f 𝑃𝐻))) | ||
| Theorem | caoftrn 7728* | Transfer a transitivity law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑇𝑧) → 𝑥𝑈𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘r 𝑅𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ∘r 𝑇𝐻) → 𝐹 ∘r 𝑈𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | caofdi 7729* | Transfer a distributive law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑇(𝑦𝑅𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝑇𝑦)𝑂(𝑥𝑇𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑇(𝐺 ∘f 𝑅𝐻)) = ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑇𝐺) ∘f 𝑂(𝐹 ∘f 𝑇𝐻))) | ||
| Theorem | caofdir 7730* | Transfer a reverse distributive law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐾)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦)𝑇𝑧) = ((𝑥𝑇𝑧)𝑂(𝑦𝑇𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐺 ∘f 𝑅𝐻) ∘f 𝑇𝐹) = ((𝐺 ∘f 𝑇𝐹) ∘f 𝑂(𝐻 ∘f 𝑇𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | caonncan 7731* | Transfer nncan 11505-shaped laws to vectors of numbers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝐼⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐼⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑀(𝑥𝑀𝑦)) = 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∘f 𝑀(𝐴 ∘f 𝑀𝐵)) = 𝐵) | ||
| Syntax | crpss 7732 | Extend class notation to include the reified proper subset relation. |
| class [⊊] | ||
| Definition | df-rpss 7733* | Define a relation which corresponds to proper subsethood df-pss 3928 on sets. This allows to use proper subsethood with general concepts that require relations, such as strict ordering, see sorpss 7738. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ [⊊] = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | relrpss 7734 | The proper subset relation is a relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ Rel [⊊] | ||
| Theorem | brrpssg 7735 | The proper subset relation on sets is the same as class proper subsethood. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 [⊊] 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | brrpss 7736 | The proper subset relation on sets is the same as class proper subsethood. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 [⊊] 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | porpss 7737 | Every class is partially ordered by proper subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ [⊊] Po 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | sorpss 7738* | Express strict ordering under proper subsets, i.e. the notion of a chain of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ ( [⊊] Or 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | sorpssi 7739 | Property of a chain of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ (( [⊊] Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | sorpssun 7740 | A chain of sets is closed under binary union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (( [⊊] Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sorpssin 7741 | A chain of sets is closed under binary intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (( [⊊] Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sorpssuni 7742* | In a chain of sets, a maximal element is the union of the chain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ ( [⊊] Or 𝑌 → (∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑌 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑌 ¬ 𝑢 ⊊ 𝑣 ↔ ∪ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | sorpssint 7743* | In a chain of sets, a minimal element is the intersection of the chain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ ( [⊊] Or 𝑌 → (∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑌 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑌 ¬ 𝑣 ⊊ 𝑢 ↔ ∩ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | sorpsscmpl 7744* | The componentwise complement of a chain of sets is also a chain of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ ( [⊊] Or 𝑌 → [⊊] Or {𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑢) ∈ 𝑌}) | ||
| Axiom | ax-un 7745* |
Axiom of Union. An axiom of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. It states
that a set 𝑦 exists that includes the union of a
given set 𝑥
i.e. the collection of all members of the members of 𝑥. The
variant axun2 7747 states that the union itself exists. A
version with the
standard abbreviation for union is uniex2 7748. A version using class
notation is uniex 7752.
The union of a class df-uni 4878 should not be confused with the union of two classes df-un 3913. Their relationship is shown in unipr 4894. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | zfun 7746* | Axiom of Union expressed with the fewest number of different variables. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2003.) Use ax-un 7745 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | axun2 7747* | A variant of the Axiom of Union ax-un 7745. For any set 𝑥, there exists a set 𝑦 whose members are exactly the members of the members of 𝑥 i.e. the union of 𝑥. Axiom Union of [BellMachover] p. 466. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | uniex2 7748* | The Axiom of Union using the standard abbreviation for union. Given any set 𝑥, its union 𝑦 exists. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 14-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = ∪ 𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | uniex2OLD 7749* | Obsolete version of uniex2 7748 as of 14-Jul-2026. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = ∪ 𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | vuniex 7750 | The union of a setvar is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 3-May-2021.) (Revised by BJ, 6-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | uniexg 7751 | The ZF Axiom of Union in class notation, in the form of a theorem instead of an inference. We use the antecedent 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 instead of 𝐴 ∈ V to make the theorem more general and thus shorten some proofs; obviously the universal class constant V is one possible substitution for class variable 𝑉. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | uniex 7752 | The Axiom of Union in class notation. This says that if 𝐴 is a set i.e. 𝐴 ∈ V (see isset 3472), then the union of 𝐴 is also a set. Same as Axiom 3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | uniexd 7753 | Deduction version of the ZF Axiom of Union in class notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | unexg 7754 | The union of two sets is a set. Corollary 5.8 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) Prove unexg 7754 first and then unex 7755 and unexb 7757 from it. (Revised by BJ, 21-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | unex 7755 | The union of two sets is a set. Corollary 5.8 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-1994.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | tpex 7756 | An unordered triple of classes exists. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | unexb 7757 | Existence of union is equivalent to existence of its components. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | xpexg 7758 | The Cartesian product of two sets is a set. Proposition 6.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. See also xpexgALT 7987. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | xpexd 7759 | The Cartesian product of two sets is a set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | 3xpexg 7760 | The Cartesian product of three sets is a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ((𝑉 × 𝑉) × 𝑉) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | xpex 7761 | The Cartesian product of two sets is a set. Proposition 6.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | unexd 7762 | The union of two sets is a set. (Contributed by SN, 16-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | sqxpexg 7763 | The Cartesian square of a set is a set. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | abnexg 7764* | Sufficient condition for a class abstraction to be a proper class. The class 𝐹 can be thought of as an expression in 𝑥 and the abstraction appearing in the statement as the class of values 𝐹 as 𝑥 varies through 𝐴. Assuming the antecedents, if that class is a set, then so is the "domain" 𝐴. The converse holds without antecedent, see abrexexg 7967. Note that the second antecedent ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 cannot be translated to 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐹 since 𝐹 may depend on 𝑥. In applications, one may take 𝐹 = {𝑥} or 𝐹 = 𝒫 𝑥 (see snnex 7766 and pwnex 7767 respectively, proved from abnex 7765, which is a consequence of abnexg 7764 with 𝐴 = V). (Contributed by BJ, 2-Dec-2021.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐴 ∈ V)) | ||
| Theorem | abnex 7765* | Sufficient condition for a class abstraction to be a proper class. Lemma for snnex 7766 and pwnex 7767. See the comment of abnexg 7764. (Contributed by BJ, 2-May-2021.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ¬ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | snnex 7766* | The class of all singletons is a proper class. See also pwnex 7767. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2008.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 7-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 5-Dec-2021.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥 = {𝑦}} ∉ V | ||
| Theorem | pwnex 7767* | The class of all power sets is a proper class. See also snnex 7766. (Contributed by BJ, 2-May-2021.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥 = 𝒫 𝑦} ∉ V | ||
| Theorem | difex2 7768 | If the subtrahend of a class difference exists, then the minuend exists iff the difference exists. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ V)) | ||
| Theorem | difsnexi 7769 | If the difference of a class and a singleton is a set, the class itself is a set. (Contributed by AV, 15-Jan-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∖ {𝐾}) ∈ V → 𝑁 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | uniuni 7770* | Expression for double union that moves union into a class abstraction. (Contributed by FL, 28-May-2007.) |
| ⊢ ∪ ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 = ∪ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)} | ||
| Theorem | uniexr 7771 | Converse of the Axiom of Union. Note that it does not require ax-un 7745. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.) |
| ⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | uniexb 7772 | The Axiom of Union and its converse. A class is a set iff its union is a set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | pwexr 7773 | Converse of the Axiom of Power Sets. Note that it does not require ax-pow 5341. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | pwexb 7774 | The Axiom of Power Sets and its converse. A class is a set iff its power class is a set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | elpwpwel 7775 | A class belongs to a double power class if and only if its union belongs to the power class. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | eldifpw 7776 | Membership in a power class difference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐶) ∈ (𝒫 (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ∖ 𝒫 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elpwun 7777 | Membership in the power class of a union. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pwuncl 7778 | Power classes are closed under union. (Contributed by AV, 27-Feb-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ 𝒫 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | iunpw 7779* | An indexed union of a power class in terms of the power class of the union of its index. Part of Exercise 24(b) of [Enderton] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2003.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = ∪ 𝐴 ↔ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝒫 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | fr3nr 7780 | A well-founded relation has no 3-cycle loops. Special case of Proposition 6.23 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∧ 𝐶𝑅𝐷 ∧ 𝐷𝑅𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | epne3 7781 | A well-founded class contains no 3-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (( E Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | dfwe2 7782* | Alternate definition of well-ordering. Definition 6.24(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | epweon 7783 | The membership relation well-orders the class of ordinal numbers. This proof does not require the axiom of regularity. Proposition 4.8(g) of [Mendelson] p. 244. For a shorter proof requiring ax-un 7745, see epweonALT 7784. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2003.) Avoid ax-un 7745. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 30-Nov-2024.) |
| ⊢ E We On | ||
| Theorem | epweonALT 7784 | Alternate proof of epweon 7783, shorter but requiring ax-un 7745. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2003.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ E We On | ||
| Theorem | ordon 7785 | The class of all ordinal numbers is ordinal. Proposition 7.12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38, but without using the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1994.) |
| ⊢ Ord On | ||
| Theorem | onprc 7786 | No set contains all ordinal numbers. Proposition 7.13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38, but without using the Axiom of Regularity. This is also known as the Burali-Forti paradox (remark in [Enderton] p. 194). In 1897, Cesare Burali-Forti noticed that since the "set" of all ordinal numbers is an ordinal class (ordon 7785), it must be both an element of the set of all ordinal numbers yet greater than every such element. ZF set theory resolves this paradox by not allowing the class of all ordinal numbers to be a set (so instead it is a proper class). Here we prove the denial of its existence. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1994.) |
| ⊢ ¬ On ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | ssorduni 7787 | The union of a class of ordinal numbers is ordinal. Proposition 7.19 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. Lemma 2.7 of [Schloeder] p. 4. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → Ord ∪ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ssonuni 7788 | The union of a set of ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. Theorem 9 of [Suppes] p. 132. Lemma 2.7 of [Schloeder] p. 4. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ⊆ On → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ On)) | ||
| Theorem | ssonunii 7789 | The union of a set of ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. Corollary 7N(d) of [Enderton] p. 193. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ On) | ||
| Theorem | ordeleqon 7790 | A way to express the ordinal property of a class in terms of the class of ordinal numbers. Corollary 7.14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2003.) |
| ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ On ∨ 𝐴 = On)) | ||
| Theorem | ordsson 7791 | Any ordinal class is a subclass of the class of ordinal numbers. Corollary 7.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ On) | ||
| Theorem | dford5 7792 | A class is ordinal iff it is a subclass of On and transitive. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ Tr 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | onss 7793 | An ordinal number is a subset of the class of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝐴 ⊆ On) | ||
| Theorem | predon 7794 | The predecessor of an ordinal under E and On is itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → Pred( E , On, 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ssonprc 7795 | Two ways of saying a class of ordinals is unbounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (𝐴 ∉ V ↔ ∪ 𝐴 = On)) | ||
| Theorem | onuni 7796 | The union of an ordinal number is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ On) | ||
| Theorem | orduni 7797 | The union of an ordinal class is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2003.) |
| ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → Ord ∪ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | onint 7798 | The intersection (infimum) of a nonempty class of ordinal numbers belongs to the class. Compare Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 45. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | onint0 7799 | The intersection of a class of ordinal numbers is zero iff the class contains zero. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (∩ 𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ∅ ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | onssmin 7800* | A nonempty class of ordinal numbers has the smallest member. Exercise 9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2003.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |