Theorem bnj589 35606

Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 35618. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bnj589.1	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj589	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω (suc 𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑘) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑘) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑖,𝑘   𝑅,𝑖,𝑘   𝑓,𝑖,𝑘,𝑦   𝑖,𝑛,𝑘

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑘, 𝑛)   𝐴(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑛)   𝑅(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj589

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj589.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
2	1	bnj222 35580	1 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω (suc 𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑘) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑘) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080  ∪ ciun 4954  suc csuc 6379  ‘cfv 6555  ωcom 7898   predc-bnj14 35386

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-ext 2735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-suc 6383  df-iota 6509  df-fv 6563

This theorem is used by:  bnj594  35609  bnj1128  35687  bnj1145  35690